Literature DB >> 23515988

Repair integrity and functional outcomes for arthroscopic margin convergence of rotator cuff tears.

Kyung Cheon Kim1, Hyun Dae Shin, Soo Min Cha, Joung Hun Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic margin convergence for rotator cuff tears.
METHODS: Twenty-four consecutive patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears, in which the free tendon edge could not be reduced to the footprint after the release and mobilization of the rotator cuff tendon, were included. Rotator cuff repair integrity was determined by magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasonography after the operation. The mean age and follow-up period for the patients were 59.6 years (range, forty-eight to seventy-three years) and 30.6 months (range, twenty-four to sixty months), respectively. Five outcome measures were used before surgery and at the time of the final follow-up: a visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the Shoulder Rating Scale of the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), the Constant-Murley score, and the range of shoulder motion.
RESULTS: The follow-up rate for imaging was 95.8%, and the follow-up rate for clinical evaluation was 91.7%. The mean UCLA score (and standard deviation) improved from 17.4 ± 5.5 preoperatively to 31.6 ± 4.0 at the time of the final follow-up (p < 0.001). The mean ASES score improved from 54.9 ± 23.3 to 91.3 ± 11.8, respectively (p < 0.001). The mean Constant-Murley score improved from 45.9 ± 17.6 to 79.1 ± 12.6 (p < 0.001). The mean VAS score improved from 6.5 ± 1.7 to 1.3 ± 1.5 (p < 0.001). The mean range of motion (forward flexion) improved from 117.9° ± 37.7° to 166.8° ± 16.7° (p < 0.001). The postoperative imaging examinations showed cuff integrity without a retear in 52.2% of the shoulders. However, the UCLA, ASES, and Constant-Murley scores were not significantly different between healed and unhealed groups (p = 0.800, p = 0.322, and p = 0.597, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Reducing tension by margin convergence followed by a repair of the resulting free edge to bone has reasonable short-term clinical results but a substantial retear rate (47.8%). However, the retears tended to be smaller than the original tear size. No significant difference was observed in the short-term clinical results between the groups with or without a retear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23515988     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  18 in total

1.  Should massive rotator cuff tears be reconstructed even when only partially repairable?

Authors:  Arnaud Godenèche; Benjamin Freychet; Riccardo Maria Lanzetti; Julien Clechet; Yannick Carrillon; Mo Saffarini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging criteria for the assessment of the rotator cuff after repair: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Gianpiero Cazzato; Mario Fodale; Giuseppe Sircana; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-01-04       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Decision-making in massive rotator cuff tear.

Authors:  André Thès; Philippe Hardy; Klaus Bak
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Stimulation of Rotator Cuff Repair by Sustained Release of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-7 Using a Gelatin Hydrogel Sheet.

Authors:  Yukichi Kabuto; Toru Morihara; Tsuyoshi Sukenari; Yoshikazu Kida; Ryo Oda; Yuji Arai; Koshiro Sawada; Ken-Ichi Matsuda; Mitsuhiro Kawata; Yasuhiko Tabata; Hiroyoshi Fujiwara; Toshikazu Kubo
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 3.845

5.  Rotator cuff repair with a tendon-fibrocartilage-bone composite bridging patch.

Authors:  Xiaoxi Ji; Qingshan Chen; Andrew R Thoreson; Jin Qu; Kai-Nan An; Peter C Amadio; Scott P Steinmann; Chunfeng Zhao
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 2.063

6.  Critical period and risk factors for retear following arthroscopic repair of the rotator cuff.

Authors:  Johannes Barth; Kevin Andrieu; Elias Fotiadis; Gerjon Hannink; Renaud Barthelemy; Mo Saffarini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  CORR Insights®: Does Margin Convergence Reverse Pseudoparalysis in Patients with Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears?

Authors:  Jason L Koh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.755

8.  Does Margin Convergence Reverse Pseudoparalysis in Patients with Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears?

Authors:  Hiroaki Inui; Jumpei Yamada; Katsuya Nobuhara
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.755

9.  A Canine Non-Weight-Bearing Model with Radial Neurectomy for Rotator Cuff Repair.

Authors:  Xiaoxi Ji; Nirong Bao; Kai-Nan An; Peter C Amadio; Scott P Steinmann; Chunfeng Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Relationship between clinical and surgical findings and reparability of large and massive rotator cuff tears: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Richard Holtby; Helen Razmjou
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-05-26       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.