Literature DB >> 23515177

The promotion of bone regeneration by nanofibrous hydroxyapatite/chitosan scaffolds by effects on integrin-BMP/Smad signaling pathway in BMSCs.

Huanhuan Liu1, Hongju Peng, Yan Wu, Can Zhang, Youzhi Cai, Guowei Xu, Qin Li, Xiao Chen, Junfeng Ji, Yanzhong Zhang, Hong Wei OuYang.   

Abstract

In bone tissue engineering, a combination of biomimetic nanofibrous scaffolds with renewable stem cells has recently emerged as a new strategy for promoting bone regeneration. We have previously developed a biomimetic nanocomposite nanofibrous scaffold of hydroxyapatite/chitosan (nHAp/CTS) [1]. However, the mechanism behind the supportive function of the scaffolds has not yet been adequately explored. Here, we evaluated the effect of nHAp/CTS seeded with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) on bone regeneration and examined the underlying mechanism in vitro and in vivo. The scaffolds of nHAp/CTS induced higher proliferation of BMSCs than membranous hydroxyapatite/chitosan (mHAp/CTS) and electrospun nanofibrous chitosan (nCTS) did. Interestingly, regardless the nanfibrous effect, nHAp/CTS and mHAp/CTS supported the spindle-shaped morphology, in contrast to the spherical shape of BMSCs on nCTS, indicating that HAp supports cell adhesion. Furthermore, the levels of the mRNA for Smad1, BMP-2/4, Runx2, ALP, collagen I, integrin subunits together with myosins were significantly up-regulated on nHAp/CTS whereas these genes were expressed at markedly low levels on mHAp/CTS and nCTS even in osteogenic medium. In addition, the critical proteins pSmad1/5/8 in BMP pathway showed clear nuclear localization and osteocalcin were significantly elevated on nHAp/CTS than mHAp/CTS (P < 0.01) and nCTS (P < 0.01). Similarly, the cells exhibited higher ALP activity on nHAp/CTS than mHAp/CTS (P < 0.01) and nCTS (P < 0.05). Therefore, the findings indicated the activating of intergrin-BMP/Smad signaling pathway of BMSCs on nHAp/CTS. Finally, in vivo, nHAp/CTS/BMSCs had a superior ability of bone reconstruction than other groups for cranial bone defects. In conclusion, our results demonstrated that nHAp/CTS scaffold promotes bone regeneration by supporting the adhesion, proliferation and activating integrin-BMP/Smad signaling pathway of BMSCs both in vitro and in vivo. Crown
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23515177     DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.02.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  60 in total

1.  In vivo bone regeneration using tubular perfusion system bioreactor cultured nanofibrous scaffolds.

Authors:  Andrew B Yeatts; Sanne K Both; Wanxun Yang; Hamdan S Alghamdi; Fang Yang; John P Fisher; John A Jansen
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 2.  Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells as a new Strategy for Osteogenesis and Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Xiangxin Lou
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.739

3.  Osseointegrative properties of electrospun hydroxyapatite-containing nanofibrous chitosan scaffolds.

Authors:  Michael E Frohbergh; Anya Katsman; Mark J Mondrinos; Collin T Stabler; Kurt D Hankenson; Jeffrey T Oristaglio; Peter I Lelkes
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 3.845

4.  Fabrication, characterization, and biocompatibility of ethyl cellulose/carbonated hydroxyapatite composite coatings on Ti6Al4V.

Authors:  Bo Tian; Sha Tang; Yang Li; Teng Long; Xin-Hua Qu; De-Gang Yu; Ya-Jun Guo; Ya-Ping Guo; Zhen-An Zhu
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Light-triggered RNA release and induction of hMSC osteogenesis via photodegradable, dual-crosslinked hydrogels.

Authors:  Cong Truc Huynh; Minh Khanh Nguyen; Mantas Naris; Gulen Yesilbag Tonga; Vincent M Rotello; Eben Alsberg
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 5.307

6.  MicroRNA profiles of BMSCs induced into osteoblasts with osteoinductive medium.

Authors:  Zhixiong Yan; Yong Guo; Yang Wang; Yanan Li; Jiahui Wang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 2.447

7.  Smart scaffolds in bone tissue engineering: A systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Saeed Reza Motamedian; Sepanta Hosseinpour; Mitra Ghazizadeh Ahsaie; Arash Khojasteh
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 5.326

8.  PNIPAAM modified mesoporous hydroxyapatite for sustained osteogenic drug release and promoting cell attachment.

Authors:  Tao Wu; Lei Tan; Ning Cheng; Qi Yan; Yu-Feng Zhang; Chuan-Jun Liu; Bin Shi
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 7.328

9.  The effect of mesoporous bioglass on osteogenesis and adipogenesis of osteoporotic BMSCs.

Authors:  Tao Wu; Ning Cheng; Chun Xu; Wei Sun; Chengzhong Yu; Bin Shi
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.396

10.  Chitosan-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Sheeny Lan Levengood; Miqin Zhang
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 6.331

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.