| Literature DB >> 23514743 |
Lars Enochson1, Mats Brittberg, Anders Lindahl.
Abstract
The standard culture system for in vitro cartilage research is based on cells in a three-dimensional micromass culture and a defined medium containing the chondrogenic key growth factor, transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1. The aim of this study was to optimize the medium for chondrocyte micromass culture. Human chondrocytes were cultured in different media formulations, designed with a factorial design of experiments (DoE) approach and based on the standard medium for redifferentiation. The significant factors for the redifferentiation of the chondrocytes were determined and optimized in a two-step process through the use of response surface methodology. TGF-β1, dexamethasone, and glucose were significant factors for differentiating the chondrocytes. Compared to the standard medium, TGF-β1 was increased 30%, dexamethasone reduced 50%, and glucose increased 22%. The potency of the optimized medium was validated in a comparative study against the standard medium. The optimized medium resulted in micromass cultures with increased expression of genes important for the articular chondrocyte phenotype and in cultures with increased glycosaminoglycan/DNA content. Optimizing the standard medium with the efficient DoE method, a new medium that gave better redifferentiation for articular chondrocytes was determined.Entities:
Keywords: TGF-β1; articular cartilage; autonomous chondrocyte implantation; design of experiments; differentiation; media development; tissue engineering
Year: 2012 PMID: 23514743 PMCID: PMC3559199 DOI: 10.1089/biores.2012.0277
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biores Open Access ISSN: 2164-7844
Factor Concentrations in Screen Design
| 1 | − | − | − | = | + |
| 2 | + | − | − | = | − |
| 3 | − | + | − | = | − |
| 4 | + | + | − | = | + |
| 5 | − | − | + | = | − |
| 6 | + | − | + | = | + |
| 7 | − | + | + | = | + |
| 8 | + | + | + | = | − |
| 9 | − | − | − | + | − |
| 10 | + | − | − | + | + |
| 11 | − | + | − | + | + |
| 12 | + | + | − | + | − |
| 13 | − | − | + | + | + |
| 14 | + | − | + | + | − |
| 15 | − | + | + | + | − |
| 16 | + | + | + | + | + |
| 17 | ◯ | ◯ | ◯ | ◯ | ◯ |
| 18 | ◯ | ◯ | ◯ | ◯ | ◯ |
| 19 | ◯ | ◯ | ◯ | ◯ | ◯ |
TGF-β1: (−), 4 ng/mL; (◯), 10 ng/mL; (+) 16 ng/mL.
Ascorbic acid (ASC): (−), 2.8 μg/mL; (◯), 14 μg/mL; (+) 25.2 μg/mL.
Insulin–transferrin–selenium solution (ITS): (−), 0.2×; (◯), 1×; (+), 1.8×.
Dexamethasone (DEX): (=), 10 nM; (◯), 100 nM; (+), 1000 nM.
HSA:LIN: (−), 0.2 mg/mL:0.4 μg/mL; (◯), 1.0 mg/mL:5.0 μg/mL; (+), 1.8 mg/mL:9 μg/mL.
No., number; TGF, transforming growth factor; HSA:LIN, human serum albumin supplemented with 5.0 μg/mL linoleic acid.
Factor Concentrations in Optimization
| | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ◯ | ≡ | − | = | ◯ |
| 2 | + | ≡ | − | ◯ | ◯ |
| 3 | ◯ | ◯ | − | = | + |
| 4 | + | ◯ | − | ◯ | + |
| 5 | ◯ | ≡ | ⊕ | = | ⊕ |
| 6 | + | ≡ | ⊕ | ◯ | ⊕ |
| 7 | ◯ | ◯ | ⊕ | − | ◯ |
| 8 | + | ◯ | ⊕ | − | + |
| 9 | ◯ | = | ◯ | − | ⊕ |
| 10 | + | = | ◯ | − | ⊕ |
| 11 | ⊕ | ≡ | ◯ | − | ⊕ |
| 12 | ⊕ | ◯ | ◯ | ||
| 13 | ⊕ | = | − | ||
| 14 | ⊕ | = | ⊕ | ||
| 15 | ⊕ | = | ◯ | ||
| 16 | ⊕ | = | ◯ | ||
| 17 | ⊕ | = | ◯ | ||
TGF-β1: (◯), 10 ng/mL; (⊕), 13 ng/mL; (+), 16 ng/mL.
DEX: (≡), 1 nM; (=), 10 nM; (−), 50 nM; (◯), 100 nM.
Glucose (GLU): (−), 1 g/L; (◯), 2.75 g/L; (⊕), 4.5 g/L; (+), 6.25 g/L.
FIG. 1.Comparison between human chondrocyte micromasses cultured in the optimized formulation and in the standard formulation, depicted as mean±standard deviation. (A) There was no significant difference in the amount of DNA in the micromass cultures from the two media formulations. (B) There was a significantly higher production of glycosaminoglycan (GAG) per cell for micromasses cultured in the optimized medium (*p<0.05).
FIG. 2.Comparison between human chondrocyte micromasses cultured in the optimized formulation and in the standard formulation, depicted as mean±standard deviation. There were significant increases in the gene expressions of (A) the ACAN:VCAN ratio, (B) SOX9, and (C) COMP (**p<0.01). There were no differences in gene expression for (D) the COLII:COLI ratio or (E) COLX.
FIG. 3.Response surfaces for optimization step 1. (A) ACAN:VCAN expression ratio as a response to the factors TGF-β1 and glucose. (B) COLII:COLI expression ratio as a response to the factors TGF-β1 and glucose. (C) SOX9 gene expression as a response to the factors TGF-β1 and dexamethasone. ACAN, aggrecan; VCAN, versican; COL, collagen; SOX9, sex determining region Y-box 9 protein.
FIG. 4.Response surface for optimization step 2. (A) ACAN:VCAN expression ratio as a response to the factors dexamethasone and glucose. (B) COLII:COLI expression ratio as a response to the factors dexamethasone and glucose. (C) SOX9 gene expression as a response to the factors dexamethasone and glucose.
FIG. 5.Representative histological cross sections of micromasses cultured in optimized medium above and standard medium below, stained with Alcian blue van Gieson staining. Scale bars=500 μm.