Literature DB >> 23514703

Arthroscopic versus posterior endoscopic excision of a symptomatic os trigonum: a retrospective cohort study.

Jae Hoon Ahn1, Yoon-Chung Kim, Ha-Yong Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Both subtalar arthroscopic and posterior endoscopic techniques are used to treat posterior ankle impingement syndrome (PAIS). However, there have been no studies comparing the 2 procedures. HYPOTHESIS: Both arthroscopic and endoscopic excisions of the os trigonum are safe and effective in treating PAIS. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS: Twenty-eight patients were treated with excision of the os trigonum either by an arthroscopic (16 patients) or endoscopic (12 patients) technique. The mean patient age was 29.8 years (range, 17-55 years), and the mean follow-up period was 30 months (range, 18-58 months). Preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and Maryland Foot Score (MFS) were used to analyze the functional results. Duration of surgery, time to return to sports (RTS), and patient satisfaction were evaluated as well. The size of the os trigonum was measured using T1-weighted sagittal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The clinical and MRI results were compared between the 2 groups.
RESULTS: The VAS score, AOFAS score, and MFS for both the arthroscopic group (preoperative: 6.3, 63.8, and 61.5, respectively; postoperative: 1.2, 89.9, and 89.6, respectively) and endoscopic group (preoperative: 6.7, 64.8, and 62.5, respectively; postoperative: 1.2, 89.9, and 88.4, respectively) improved significantly (P < .01). The mean surgery and RTS times were 39.4 minutes and 7.5 weeks in the arthroscopic group and 34.8 minutes and 8.0 weeks in the endoscopic group, respectively (P > .05). All patients were satisfied with the results. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the preoperative and postoperative VAS score, AOFAS score, or MFS (P > .05). The mean size of the os trigonum was 11.1 × 8.8 mm(2) in the arthroscopic group and 12.6 × 10.4 mm(2) in the endoscopic group, and the difference was significant (P < .05). Two patients underwent both arthroscopic and endoscopic procedures because of technical difficulty in removing the large os trigonum arthroscopically.
CONCLUSION: Both arthroscopic and posterior endoscopic excisions of the os trigonum were safe and effective in treating PAIS. The arthroscopic procedure was more demanding, especially in cases of a large os trigonum. The posterior endoscopic approach had the advantage of addressing problems in the posterior ankle joint and allowed a more extensive release of the flexor hallucis longus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arthroscopic excision; os trigonum; posterior ankle impingement syndrome; posterior endoscopic excision

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23514703     DOI: 10.1177/0363546513480614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  8 in total

1.  Endoscopic treatment of the posterior ankle impingement syndrome on amateur and professional athletes.

Authors:  Mauro Cesar Mattos E Dinato; Isabela Ugo Luques; Marcio de Faria Freitas; Miguel Viana Pereira Filho; André Felipe Ninomiya; Rodrigo Gonçalves Pagnano; Maurício Etchebehere
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Evidence-based indications for hindfoot endoscopy.

Authors:  Pietro Spennacchio; Davide Cucchi; Pietro S Randelli; Niek C van Dijk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Painful stress reaction in the posterior subtalar joint after resection of os trigonum or posterior talar process.

Authors:  Arno Frigg; Gerardo Maquieira; Monika Horisberger
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Decompression of Posterior Ankle Impingement With Concomitant Anterior Ankle Pathology by Posterior Ankle Arthroscopy in the Supine Position.

Authors:  Tun Hing Lui
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2016-10-17

5.  Delayed diagnosis of posterior ankle impingement in pediatric and adolescent patients: does radiology play a role?

Authors:  Indranil Kushare; Matthew G Ditzler; Siddharth P Jadhav
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-11-09

6.  The double posteromedial portals endoscopy for posterior ankle impingement syndrome in athletes.

Authors:  Nicola Maffulli; Rocco Aicale; Filippo Migliorini; Emilio Wagner; Amol Saxena; Francesco Oliva
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2022-07-06

7.  Endoscopic Treatment of Posterior Ankle Impingement Secondary to Os Trigonum in Recreational Athletes.

Authors:  Dimitrios Nikolopoulos; George Safos; Konstantinos Moustakas; Neoptolemos Sergides; Petros Safos; Athanasios Siderakis; Dimitrios Kalpaxis; Andreas Moutsios-Rentzos
Journal:  Foot Ankle Orthop       Date:  2020-09-23

8.  Isolated Posterior Medial Ankle Dislocation with Associated Os Trigonum Dislocation after Low-Energy Mechanism.

Authors:  Devan Irving; Brent Geers; Bruce Lawrence
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2020-01-27
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.