Literature DB >> 23514656

Intravitreal bevacizumab monotherapy for treatment-naïve polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy.

Jay Kumar Chhablani, Ritesh Narula, Raja Narayanan.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23514656      PMCID: PMC3665049          DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.109390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0301-4738            Impact factor:   1.848


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) is primarily a choroidal vascular disease, which can lead to acute severe visual loss secondary to massive submacular or vitreous hemorrhage. Various treatment modalities, such as direct thermal laser photocoagulation, tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) injection with gas displacement, submacular surgery and macular translocation surgery have been proposed. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin has shown good results for PCV, but extensive subretinal hemorrhages and exudation limits its application.[1] Favorable results have been reported with combined therapy, including PDT and intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB), to treat PCV.[2] We evaluated nine eyes of eight patients with PCV who were treated with IVB monotherapy. We excluded patients that had any previous treatment for PCV or wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in the study or contralateral eye. All participants received a comprehensive ocular examination including digital fluorescein angiography (FA), indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) at baseline, and at 3-monthly interval visits till last follow-up. IVB injection was performed as per standard protocol. Repeat treatment was performed every 4 weeks if the OCT showed persistent pigment epithelial detachment (PED)/subretinal fluid (SRF) or active polypoidal lesion on fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA)/ICGA. The mean age was 60.6 years and 37.5% of the patients were female. At baseline, the median Snellen best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 20/2000 (range 20/30–20/10,000). The mean follow-up duration was 8.4 months (range 4–12 months). All eyes showed resolution of subretinal hemorrhage, PED [Fig. 1] and angiographic activity [Fig. 2], but persistence of polypoidal lesion was noted in three eyes. At the last follow-up, the median Snellen BCVA was 20/100 (range 20/25–20/400). The mean log MAR BCVA showed a statistically significant improvement from 1.41 to 0.63 (P = 0.04). Seven (77.7%) eyes showed significant improvement in visual acuity, with mean number of line improvement of 6.5. The remaining two eyes maintained the baseline visual acuity till last follow-up. The mean number of injections was 2.3. The mean longest treatment-free period was 5.88 months. No significant systemic or ocular side-effects were observed in any of the eyes receiving IVB injections.
Figure 1

Fundus photo at baseline (a) shows hemorrhagic pigment epithelial detachment (PED) involving the fovea with subretinal hemorrhage. (b) (at 1-month follow-up) Reduction in the PED with decrease in subretinal hemorrhage. (c) (at 3-month follow-up) Disappearance of subretinal hemorrhage and PED. (d) OCT at baseline shows a PED with intraretinal cystic fluid at the edge of the PED. (e) (At 1-month follow-up) and (f) (at 3-month follow-up) Significant reduction in the height of the PED on OCT

Figure 2

Indocyanine green angiographic images (a) before treatment and (b) 1 year after treatment, showing regression of polyps (arrows) after treatment

Fundus photo at baseline (a) shows hemorrhagic pigment epithelial detachment (PED) involving the fovea with subretinal hemorrhage. (b) (at 1-month follow-up) Reduction in the PED with decrease in subretinal hemorrhage. (c) (at 3-month follow-up) Disappearance of subretinal hemorrhage and PED. (d) OCT at baseline shows a PED with intraretinal cystic fluid at the edge of the PED. (e) (At 1-month follow-up) and (f) (at 3-month follow-up) Significant reduction in the height of the PED on OCT Indocyanine green angiographic images (a) before treatment and (b) 1 year after treatment, showing regression of polyps (arrows) after treatment In our study, mean BCVA improvement of 2 or more lines was seen in 72% of the patients, and the remaining 28% showed a stabilization of visual acuity at mean follow-up of 8.4 months. Kokame et al.,[3] reported stabilization of vision at 6 months, with monthly intravitreal injection of ranibizumab in PCV. Lai et al., reported stabilization of vision and reduction in exudative detachment with intravitreal bevacizumab, but a limited role in regression of polypoidal lesions in ICGA. Persistent lesions were treated with PDT.[4] In our study, persistent lesions were closely followed-up, which did not bleed again during the follow-up. Complete regression of polypoidal lesion in ICGA may not be the therapeutic target, but close follow-up is mandatory. In conclusion, our study demonstrated that IVB injection helps to improve or maintain the vision in patients with symptomatic treatment-naïve PCV.
  4 in total

1.  Combined photodynamic therapy with verteporfin and intravitreal bevacizumab for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy.

Authors:  Taku Sato; Shoji Kishi; Hidetaka Matsumoto; Ryo Mukai
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) with or without photodynamic therapy for the treatment of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy.

Authors:  T Y Y Lai; W-M Chan; D T L Liu; F O J Luk; D S C Lam
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin for symptomatic polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: one-year results of a prospective case series.

Authors:  Wai-Man Chan; Dennis S C Lam; Timothy Y Y Lai; David T L Liu; Kenneth K W Li; Yi Yao; Tak-Hung Wong
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Continuous anti-VEGF treatment with ranibizumab for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: 6-month results.

Authors:  Gregg T Kokame; Ling Yeung; James C Lai
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 4.638

  4 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Idiopathic polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: a review of literature with clinical update on current management practices.

Authors:  Yamini Sahu; Niharika Chaudhary; Mukesh Joshi; Aastha Gandhi
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Comparison of the 1-year Outcomes of Conbercept Therapy between Two Different Angiographic Subtypes of Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy.

Authors:  Yong Cheng; Xuan Shi; Jin-Feng Qu; Ming-Wei Zhao; Xiao-Xin Li
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 3.  Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: An update on current management and review of literature.

Authors:  Amit Harishchandra Palkar; Vikas Khetan
Journal:  Taiwan J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun

4.  Comparison of intravitreal ziv-aflibercept and bevacizumab monotherapy in treatment-naive polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy.

Authors:  Sumit Randhir Singh; Niroj Kumar Sahoo; Nallamasa Rohit Goud; Jay Chhablani
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 5.  Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: an update on therapeutic approaches.

Authors:  Raymond L M Wong; Timothy Y Y Lai
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2013-10

6.  Treatment of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy with intravitreal bevacizumab monotherapy.

Authors:  Colin S H Tan; Louis W Lim; Wei Kiong Ngo; Kai Xiong Cheong
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.848

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.