Literature DB >> 23514547

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus ureteroscopic lithotomy for large (>15 mm) impacted upper ureteral stones in different locations: is the upper border of the fourth lumbar vertebra a good indication for choice of management method?

Hai Li1, Wanli Na, Hongyan Li, Yang Jiang, Xinquan Gu, Muchun Zhang, Wei Huo, Xiangbo Kong.   

Abstract

Abstract To determine whether treatment of patients with large (>15 mm) impacted upper ureteral stones depended on stone location, we prospectively evaluated the therapeutic outcomes, complications, safety, and effectiveness of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and ureteroscopic lithotomy (URSL) in patients with stones higher and lower than the upper border of the fourth lumbar vertebra. Of the 174 patients analyzed, 83 (47.7%) underwent PCNL and 91 (52.3%) underwent URSL; all patients were followed up 1 month later and every 6 months for 18 months. Mean operation time (108.76±19.36 vs. 63.56±16.38 minutes, p<0.05) and postoperative hospital stay (2.49±1.23 vs. 5.36±1.98 days, p<0.05) were significantly longer in the PCNL than in the URSL group. The overall stone-free rates after 1 month were 96.4% and 75.8%, respectively, differing significantly for stones higher (97.8% vs. 57.5%, p<0.05) but not lower (94.7% vs. 90.2%) than the upper border of the fourth lumbar vertebra. The stone-retropulsion rate of URSL differed significantly for stones higher and lower than the upper border of the 4th lumbar vertebra (47.5% vs. 9.8%, p<0.05). Postprocedural complication rates were comparable in the URSL and PCNL groups, although the rate of auxiliary or salvage procedures was higher in the URSL group. The efficiency quotients (EQ) for PCNL and URSL were 0.93 and 0.59, respectively, with EQs in the URSL group differing significantly for stones higher and lower than the upper border of the fourth lumbar vertebra (0.40 vs. 0.82, p<0.05). Our findings indicate that treatment of impacted upper ureteral stones is dependent on stone location relative to the upper border of the fourth lumbar vertebra. URSL is unsuitable for stones at a higher location, whereas URSL and PCNL were equally effective for stones at a lower location.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23514547     DOI: 10.1089/end.2012.0535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  7 in total

Review 1.  Evidence for Ureterorenoscopy and Laser Fragmentation (URSL) for Large Renal Stones in the Modern Era.

Authors:  Robert Geraghty; Omar Abourmarzouk; Bhavan Rai; Chandra Shakhar Biyani; Nicholas J Rukin; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Characteristics and outcomes of ureteroscopic treatment in 2650 patients with impacted ureteral stones.

Authors:  Jaap D Legemate; Nienke J Wijnstok; Tadashi Matsuda; Willem Strijbos; Tibet Erdogru; Beat Roth; Hidefumi Kinoshita; Judith Palacios-Ramos; Roberto M Scarpa; Jean J de la Rosette
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large proximal ureteral stones: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qing Wang; Jiachao Guo; Henglong Hu; Yuchao Lu; Jiaqiao Zhang; Baolong Qin; Yufeng Wang; Zongbiao Zhang; Shaogang Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Suctioning semirigid ureteroscopic lithotomy versus minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large upper ureteral stones: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Hequn Chen; Zewu Zhu; Yu Cui; Yang Li; Zhiyong Chen; Zhongqing Yang; Feng Zeng
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-03

Review 5.  Semi-rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for large upper ureteral stones: a meta - analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Fabio C M Torricelli; Manoj Monga; Giovanni S Marchini; Miguel Srougi; William C Nahas; Eduardo Mazzucchi
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

6.  Antegrade mini-percutaneous flexible ureteroscopy versus retrograde ureteroscopy for treating impacted proximal ureteric stones of 1-2 cm: A prospective randomised study.

Authors:  Omar Elgebaly; Hussein Abdeldayem; Faisal Idris; Alaa Elrifai; Ahmed Fahmy
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2020-08-23

7.  Diagnosis accuracy of PCA3 level in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shu Gan; Zhenlang Guo; Qianming Zou; Chiming Gu; Songtao Xiang; Siyi Li; Zhangqun Ye; Shusheng Wang
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2020 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.050

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.