Literature DB >> 23513199

Early implant loading in the atrophic posterior maxilla: 1-stage lateral versus crestal sinus lift and 8 mm hydroxyapatite-coated implants. A 5-year randomised controlled trial.

Gioacchino Cannizzaro1, Pietro Felice, Armando Francesco Minciarelli, Michele Leone, Paolo Viola, Marco Esposito.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of long implants (10-16 mm) inserted in maxillary sinuses augmented according to a lateral approach versus short (8 mm) implants placed in crestally augmented sinuses, early loaded after 45 days.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty partially or fully edentulous patients having 3 to 6 mm of residual crestal height and at least 4 mm in thickness below the maxillary sinuses were randomised according to a parallel group design to receive either one to three 10 to 16 mm-long hydroxyapatite-coated implants (20 patients) after lateral sinus lifting with 50% an organic bovine (Bio-Oss) and 50% autogenous bone, or 8 mm implants (20 patients) after crestal sinus lifting with autogenous bone. Implants were submerged and left healing for 45 days before loading the implants. Within 1 week after abutment connection, implants were loaded with screw-retained full acrylic provisional prostheses. Definitive metal-ceramic prostheses were provisionally cemented 45 days after abutment connection. Outcome measures were prosthesis and implant failures, any complications, and radiographic periimplant marginal bone level changes. In addition, the stability of individual implants was assessed with Osstell and Periotest at abutment connection (baseline), and at 1 and 5 years after loading by blinded outcome assessors. All patients were followed up to 5 years after loading.
RESULTS: One patient dropped out (death) from the longer implant group. One implant failed in the short implant group versus 5 implants in 3 patients of the longer implant group. The difference was not statistically significant. Four complications occurred in 4 patients of the short implant group versus 8 complications in 7 patients of the long implant group, the difference being not statistically significantly different. However, the 2 major postoperative complications occurred in the longer implant group: 1 abscess, and 1 sinusitis that led to the complete failure of the treatment in 2 patients (4 implants lost). A total of 0.72 mm of peri-implant marginal bone was lost after 5 years at long implants and 0.41 mm at short implants, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P = 0.028). Osstell values increased and Periotest decreased over time and there were no differences between groups at any time points.
CONCLUSIONS: In atrophic maxillary sinuses with a residual bone height of 3 to 6 mm, 8 mm short implants placed in a simultaneously crestally lifted sinus might be a preferable choice than a 1-stage lateral sinus lift for placing longer implants since they appear to be associated with less morbidity. If these implants are placed with an insertion torque >35 Ncm and are joined together under the same prosthesis, they can be early loaded at 6 weeks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23513199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 1756-2406            Impact factor:   3.123


  9 in total

Review 1.  Short Implants versus Longer Implants with Sinus Floor Elevation: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with a Post-Loading Follow-Up Duration of 5 Years.

Authors:  Miaozhen Wang; Feng Liu; Christian Ulm; Huidan Shen; Xiaohui Rausch-Fan
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.748

2.  A Radiographic and Clinical Comparison of Immediate vs. Early Loading (4 Weeks) of Implants with a New Thermo-Chemically Treated Surface: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Matteo Albertini; Federico Herrero-Climent; Carmen María Díaz-Castro; Jose Nart; Ana Fernández-Palacín; José Vicente Ríos-Santos; Mariano Herrero-Climent
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Association between implant apex and sinus floor in posterior maxilla dental implantation: A three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  Xu Yan; Xinwen Zhang; Weichao Chi; Hongjun Ai; Lin Wu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Management of acute maxillary sinusitis after sinus bone grafting procedures with simultaneous dental implants placement - a retrospective study.

Authors:  Lucian Chirilă; Cristian Rotaru; Iulian Filipov; Mihai Săndulescu
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.090

Review 5.  Quality assessment of systematic reviews regarding the effectiveness of zygomatic implants: an overview of systematic reviews.

Authors:  P-H Sales; M-V Gomes; O-B Oliveira-Neto; F-J de Lima; J-C Leão
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2020-07-01

6.  The use of hydroxyapatite bone substitute grafting for alveolar ridge preservation, sinus augmentation, and periodontal bone defect: A systematic review.

Authors:  Anne Handrini Dewi; Ika Dewi Ana
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2018-11-02

7.  Sinus Floor Elevation via an Osteotome Technique without Biomaterials.

Authors:  Rodrigo Andrés-García; José Vicente Ríos-Santos; Mariano Herrero-Climent; Pedro Bullón; Javier Fernández-Farhall; Alberto Gómez-Menchero; Ana Fernández-Palacín; Blanca Ríos-Carrasco
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Peri-implant tissue conditions following transcrestal and lateral sinus floor elevation: 3-year results of a bi-center, randomized trial.

Authors:  Roberto Farina; Anna Simonelli; Giovanni Franceschetti; Luigi Minenna; Gian Pietro Schincaglia; Orio Riccardi; Leonardo Trombelli
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 3.606

Review 9.  Simultaneous placement of short implants (≤ 8 mm) versus standard length implants (≥ 10 mm) after sinus floor elevation in atrophic posterior maxillae: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chenxi Tang; Qianhui Du; Jiaying Luo; Lin Peng
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-10-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.