Literature DB >> 23513000

A comparative needle study: EUS-FNA procedures using the HD ProCore(™) and EchoTip(®) 22-gauge needle types.

Benjamin L Witt1, Douglas G Adler, Kristen Hilden, Lester J Layfield.   

Abstract

The specific needle sizes/types used in performing endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspirations (EUS-FNA) vary. The HD ProCore(™) is a 22-gauge beveled needle allowing for core biopsy along with aspiration material. In this study we compare this needle with a standard 22-gauge needle. Between April 1, 2011 and November 15, 2011, 18 patients undergoing EUS-FNA using the HD ProCore(™) needle were compared to a control group of 18 cases using the standard 22-gauge needle. Smears were assessed for: three-dimensional clusters, thick obscuring clusters, monolayer sheets, cellularity, crowded obscuring single cells, blood, and nuclear staining. Cell blocks were assessed for cellularity and presence of diagnostic material. Records were reviewed for the overall adequacy, number of FNA passes, and patient follow-up. Overall, the two needle groups demonstrated similar results for the cytology parameters, amount of diagnostic cell block material, adequacy, and accuracy. The mean number of passes to achieve adequacy varied between the groups [2.94 for the standard 22-gauge needle group versus 2.11 for the beveled needle group (P=0.03)] with no meaningful difference in case duration between needle groups. No complications were reported. The beveled EUS needle affords similar cytologic interpretability, adequacy, diagnostic accuracy, and amount of cell block material as a standard needle. There was a statistically significant trend toward fewer passes to achieve adequacy with the beveled EUS-FNA needle. Therefore, the EUS-FNA needle with a lateral bevel is a diagnostically similar alternative to standard endoscopy needles, the possibility that this beveled needle may improve per pass adequacy requires further verification.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FNA; adequacy; needle; pancreas

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23513000     DOI: 10.1002/dc.22971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Cytopathol        ISSN: 1097-0339            Impact factor:   1.582


  30 in total

1.  Endosonographer's macroscopic evaluation of EUS-FNAB specimens after interactive cytopathologic training: a single-center prospective validation cohort study.

Authors:  Hong Joo Kim; Yoon Suk Jung; Jung Ho Park; Dong Il Park; Yong Kyun Cho; Chong Il Sohn; Woo Kyu Jeon; Byung Ik Kim; Kyu Yong Choi; Seungho Ryu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Endoscopic ultrasonography guided-fine needle aspiration for the diagnosis of solid pancreaticobiliary lesions: Clinical aspects to improve the diagnosis.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Matsubayashi; Toru Matsui; Yohei Yabuuchi; Kenichiro Imai; Masaki Tanaka; Naomi Kakushima; Keiko Sasaki; Hiroyuki Ono
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  The clinical usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and biopsy for rectal and perirectal lesions.

Authors:  Jae Seung Soh; Ho-Su Lee; Seohyun Lee; Jungho Bae; Hyo Jeong Lee; Sang Hyoung Park; Dong-Hoon Yang; Kyung-Jo Kim; Byong Duk Ye; Seung-Jae Myung; Suk-Kyun Yang; Jin-Ho Kim; Jeong-Sik Byeon
Journal:  Intest Res       Date:  2015-04-27

4.  25-gauge histology needle versus 22-gauge cytology needle in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions and lymphadenopathy.

Authors:  Georgios Mavrogenis; Birgit Weynand; Alain Sibille; Hocine Hassaini; Pierre Deprez; Cédric Gillain; Philippe Warzée
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2014-12-12

5.  From cytology to histology: diagnosis of a relapsed mediastinal lymphoma by endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial histological needle.

Authors:  Miguel Angel Ariza-Prota; Antonio Bango Álvarez; Liliana Pérez; Ana Pando-Sandoval; Nelson Fuentes; Pere Casan
Journal:  Respirol Case Rep       Date:  2015-05-07

Review 6.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration: How to obtain a core biopsy?

Authors:  Lorenzo Fuccio; Alberto Larghi
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.628

7.  Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound guided 22-gauge core needle with standard 25-gauge fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing solid pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Manuel Berzosa; Nicolas Villa; Hasheme B El-Serag; Divyesh V Sejpal; Kalpesh K Patel
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 5.628

8.  A randomized controlled cross-over trial and cost analysis comparing endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration and fine needle biopsy.

Authors:  A Aziz Aadam; Sachin Wani; Ashley Amick; Janak N Shah; Yasser M Bhat; Christopher M Hamerski; Jason B Klapman; V Raman Muthusamy; Rabindra R Watson; Alfred W Rademaker; Rajesh N Keswani; Laurie Keefer; Ananya Das; Srinadh Komanduri
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-05

9.  Comparing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine needle biopsy (FNB) in the diagnosis of solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jinlin Wang; Xiaoli Wu; Ping Yin; Qiaozhen Guo; Wei Hou; Yawen Li; Yun Wang; Bin Cheng
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 10.  A new needle on the block: EchoTip ProCore endobronchial ultrasound needle.

Authors:  H Erhan Dincer; Rafael Andrade; Felix Zamora; Eitan Podgaetz
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2016-03-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.