Literature DB >> 23512870

Drug safety data mining with a tree-based scan statistic.

Martin Kulldorff1, Inna Dashevsky, Taliser R Avery, Arnold K Chan, Robert L Davis, David Graham, Richard Platt, Susan E Andrade, Denise Boudreau, Margaret J Gunter, Lisa J Herrinton, Pamala A Pawloski, Marsha A Raebel, Douglas Roblin, Jeffrey S Brown.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In post-marketing drug safety surveillance, data mining can potentially detect rare but serious adverse events. Assessing an entire collection of drug-event pairs is traditionally performed on a predefined level of granularity. It is unknown a priori whether a drug causes a very specific or a set of related adverse events, such as mitral valve disorders, all valve disorders, or different types of heart disease. This methodological paper evaluates the tree-based scan statistic data mining method to enhance drug safety surveillance.
METHODS: We use a three-million-member electronic health records database from the HMO Research Network. Using the tree-based scan statistic, we assess the safety of selected antifungal and diabetes drugs, simultaneously evaluating overlapping diagnosis groups at different granularity levels, adjusting for multiple testing. Expected and observed adverse event counts were adjusted for age, sex, and health plan, producing a log likelihood ratio test statistic.
RESULTS: Out of 732 evaluated disease groupings, 24 were statistically significant, divided among 10 non-overlapping disease categories. Five of the 10 signals are known adverse effects, four are likely due to confounding by indication, while one may warrant further investigation.
CONCLUSION: The tree-based scan statistic can be successfully applied as a data mining tool in drug safety surveillance using observational data. The total number of statistical signals was modest and does not imply a causal relationship. Rather, data mining results should be used to generate candidate drug-event pairs for rigorous epidemiological studies to evaluate the individual and comparative safety profiles of drugs.
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23512870     DOI: 10.1002/pds.3423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf        ISSN: 1053-8569            Impact factor:   2.890


  26 in total

Review 1.  Research Techniques Made Simple: An Introduction to Use and Analysis of Big Data in Dermatology.

Authors:  Mackenzie R Wehner; Katherine A Levandoski; Martin Kulldorff; Maryam M Asgari
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 8.551

2.  The 9th Biennial Conference on Signal Detection and Interpretation in Pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  Vicki Osborne; Saad A W Shakir
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Identifying signals of interest when screening for drug-outcome associations in health care data.

Authors:  Anton Pottegård; Jesper Hallas; Shirley V Wang; Joshua J Gagne
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-06-03       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Data Mining for Adverse Drug Events With a Propensity Score-matched Tree-based Scan Statistic.

Authors:  Shirley V Wang; Judith C Maro; Elande Baro; Rima Izem; Inna Dashevsky; James R Rogers; Michael Nguyen; Joshua J Gagne; Elisabetta Patorno; Krista F Huybrechts; Jacqueline M Major; Esther Zhou; Megan Reidy; Austin Cosgrove; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Martin Kulldorff
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 5.  Leveraging the Capabilities of the FDA's Sentinel System To Improve Kidney Care.

Authors:  Sruthi Adimadhyam; Erin F Barreto; Noelle M Cocoros; Sengwee Toh; Jeffrey S Brown; Judith C Maro; Jacqueline Corrigan-Curay; Gerald J Dal Pan; Robert Ball; David Martin; Michael Nguyen; Richard Platt; Xiaojuan Li
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 10.121

6.  An Automated System Combining Safety Signal Detection and Prioritization from Healthcare Databases: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Mickael Arnaud; Bernard Bégaud; Frantz Thiessard; Quentin Jarrion; Julien Bezin; Antoine Pariente; Francesco Salvo
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Have Current Systems of Pharmacovigilance Had Their Day?

Authors: 
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2020-04-01

Review 8.  Improving postapproval drug safety surveillance: getting better information sooner.

Authors:  Sean Hennessy; Brian L Strom
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 13.820

9.  An Implementation and Visualization of the Tree-Based Scan Statistic for Safety Event Monitoring in Longitudinal Electronic Health Data.

Authors:  Stephen E Schachterle; Sharon Hurley; Qing Liu; Kenneth R Petronis; Andrew Bate
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 10.  Sources of Safety Data and Statistical Strategies for Design and Analysis: Postmarket Surveillance.

Authors:  Rima Izem; Matilde Sanchez-Kam; Haijun Ma; Richard Zink; Yueqin Zhao
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 1.778

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.