Literature DB >> 23512612

The impact of maternal weight discrepancies on prenatal screening results for Down syndrome.

Tianhua Huang1, Wendy S Meschino, Nan Okun, Alan Dennis, Barry Hoffman, Nathalie Lepage, Shamim Rashid, Ritu Aul, Sandra A Farrell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the quantitative impact of maternal weight discrepancy on the screen result for Down syndrome when using Integrated Prenatal Screening and First Trimester Combined Screening.
METHODS: The study population consisted of 78,165 women undergoing prenatal screening in Ontario, Canada, and 158 pregnancies affected with Down syndrome at one Ontario center. The study assessed quantitative alterations of the multiple of the median values of first and second-trimester serum markers and the risks of Down syndrome at a set of theoretical weight discrepancies.
RESULTS: Weight discrepancies have the greatest impact on screening results when the initial risk is close to the risk cut-off. When the weight discrepancy is 5 lb or greater and the denominator of the initial risk is within 50 of the risk cut-off, the chance that a screen result will change from positive to negative or from negative to positive is 47-55% for women undertaking Integrated Prenatal Screening. This chance is 33-43% for women undertaking First Trimester Combined Screening.
CONCLUSION: A weight discrepancy of five or more pounds has a significant impact on the risk of Down syndrome; correction of maternal weight would improve the accuracy of the screening test.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23512612     DOI: 10.1002/pd.4090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  2 in total

1.  Normative weight-adjusted models for the median levels of first trimester serum biomarkers for trisomy 21 screening in a specific ethnicity.

Authors:  Ounjai Kor-Anantakul; Thitima Suntharasaj; Chitkasaem Suwanrath; Tharangrut Hanprasertpong; Savitree Pranpanus; Ninlapa Pruksanusak; Suthiraporn Janwadee; Alan Geater
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Limitations of Aneuploidy and Anomaly Detection in the Obese Patient.

Authors:  Paula Zozzaro-Smith; Lisa M Gray; Stephen J Bacak; Loralei L Thornburg
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 4.241

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.