Literature DB >> 23512078

S-100B: a stronger prognostic biomarker than LDH in stage IIIB-C melanoma.

K P Wevers1, S Kruijff, M J Speijers, E Bastiaannet, A C Muller Kobold, H J Hoekstra.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In melanoma patients with nodal macrometastases, the distinction between good and poor prognosis is based on the presence of primary melanoma ulceration or metastatic involvement of 4 or more lymph nodes in the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) classification. We hypothesized that biomarkers would increase the accurateness of staging in these patients. The aim was to assess and compare the prognostic impact of biomarkers S-100B and LDH and to determine the best timing of their measurement in stage IIIB-C melanoma.
METHODS: A total of 119 patients underwent therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND) for nodal macrometastases with serum S-100B and LDH level measurements preoperatively. In 75 of them, S-100B and LDH were also measured on postoperative days 1 and 2. S-100B and LDH levels on days 0, 1, and 2 were compared for their association with disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS).
RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 17 (range 1-89) months, S-100B levels at all time points were associated with DFS. In multivariable analysis, preoperative S-100B and S-100B measured on day 2 showed the strongest association with DFS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.55, P = 0.007 and HR 3.80, P = 0.01). For DSS, the preoperative S-100B level was the strongest independent predictor (HR 2.81, P = 0.01). LDH measurements showed a significant association with DSS in univariate analysis only when measured preoperatively (HR 2.46, P = 0.01). In multivariable analysis, LDH measurement was not associated with melanoma prognosis.
CONCLUSIONS: The S-100B level measured preoperatively is, in contrast to LDH, one of the most important independent predictors of melanoma prognosis in patients undergoing TLND for nodal macrometastases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23512078     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-013-2949-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  10 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers in melanoma: where are we now?

Authors:  Douglas B Johnson; Ryan J Sullivan
Journal:  Melanoma Manag       Date:  2014-12-04

Review 2.  Impact of Circulating and Tissue Biomarkers in Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Therapy for High-Risk Melanoma: Ready for Prime Time?

Authors:  Alice Indini; Fausto Roila; Francesco Grossi; Daniela Massi; Mario Mandalà
Journal:  Am J Clin Dermatol       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 7.403

Review 3.  Clinically Meaningful Use of Blood Tumor Markers in Oncology.

Authors:  Stefan Holdenrieder; Lance Pagliaro; David Morgenstern; Farshid Dayyani
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  Identification of risk in cutaneous melanoma patients: Prognostic and predictive markers.

Authors:  David M Hyams; Robert W Cook; Antonio C Buzaid
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 3.454

5.  Tumor microenvironment-derived S100A8/A9 is a novel prognostic biomarker for advanced melanoma patients and during immunotherapy with anti-PD-1 antibodies.

Authors:  Nikolaus B Wagner; Benjamin Weide; Mirko Gries; Maike Reith; Kathrin Tarnanidis; Valerie Schuermans; Charlotte Kemper; Coretta Kehrel; Anne Funder; Ramtin Lichtenberger; Antje Sucker; Esther Herpel; Tim Holland-Letz; Dirk Schadendorf; Claus Garbe; Viktor Umansky; Jochen Utikal; Christoffer Gebhardt
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 13.751

6.  S-100B as an extra selection tool for FDG PET/CT scanning in follow-up of AJCC stage III melanoma patients.

Authors:  Eric A Deckers; Kevin P Wevers; Anneke C Muller Kobold; Samantha Damude; Otis M Vrielink; Robert J van Ginkel; Lukas B Been; Barbara L van Leeuwen; Harald J Hoekstra; Schelto Kruijff
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 7.  Role of Biomarkers in the Integrated Management of Melanoma.

Authors:  Piyu Parth Naik
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 3.434

Review 8.  Inflammation markers in cutaneous melanoma - edgy biomarkers for prognosis.

Authors:  Monica Neagu; Carolina Constantin; Georgiana Roxana Dumitrascu; Andreea Roxana Lupu; Constantin Caruntu; Daniel Boda; Sabina Zurac
Journal:  Discoveries (Craiova)       Date:  2015-03-27

9.  Aberrant RNA Splicing Events Driven by Mutations of RNA-Binding Proteins as Indicators for Skin Cutaneous Melanoma Prognosis.

Authors:  Chao Mei; Pei-Yuan Song; Wei Zhang; Hong-Hao Zhou; Xi Li; Zhao-Qian Liu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Predictive Performance of Serum S100B Versus LDH in Melanoma Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Eszter Anna Janka; Tünde Várvölgyi; Zoltán Sipos; Alexandra Soós; Péter Hegyi; Szabolcs Kiss; Fanni Dembrovszky; Dezső Csupor; Patrik Kéringer; Dániel Pécsi; Margit Solymár; Gabriella Emri
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 6.244

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.