BACKGROUND: Telementoring is a video-conferencing tool which can deliver expert opinion to physicians and their patients in remote locations. We report our experience with the use of telementoring as a technique to instruct in the performance of posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (PRA). Issues regarding utility, regulation, and future directions of telementoring are addressed. METHODS: Two consecutive PRAs conducted at Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, with telementored guidance from MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, are presented. Practical points in implementing cross-institutional telementoring are presented. A review of the current literature was done to discuss medicolegal issues, regulations and a proposal for future implementation of this technique. RESULTS: The PRAs were performed after careful preparation of appropriate issues regarding cross-institutional telementoring. The procedures were performed quickly and safely. Loss of transmission occurred once, but was reestablished within seconds and was not disruptive to the surgical procedure. Patients were discharged within 48 hours and without complications. In our experience, telementoring was convenient and effective in helping with the execution of a new surgical technique. CONCLUSIONS: Telementoring is a technical application with utility in remotely helping and guiding another surgeon through the execution of a novel surgical approach. The cyberspace consultation is safe and enhances patient care through a real-time collaborative approach which extends beyond the confines of one institution and one surgeon. Aspects concerning improvement in both implementation and regulation of telementoring mandate further research and creation of nationwide guidelines.
BACKGROUND: Telementoring is a video-conferencing tool which can deliver expert opinion to physicians and their patients in remote locations. We report our experience with the use of telementoring as a technique to instruct in the performance of posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (PRA). Issues regarding utility, regulation, and future directions of telementoring are addressed. METHODS: Two consecutive PRAs conducted at Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, with telementored guidance from MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, are presented. Practical points in implementing cross-institutional telementoring are presented. A review of the current literature was done to discuss medicolegal issues, regulations and a proposal for future implementation of this technique. RESULTS: The PRAs were performed after careful preparation of appropriate issues regarding cross-institutional telementoring. The procedures were performed quickly and safely. Loss of transmission occurred once, but was reestablished within seconds and was not disruptive to the surgical procedure. Patients were discharged within 48 hours and without complications. In our experience, telementoring was convenient and effective in helping with the execution of a new surgical technique. CONCLUSIONS: Telementoring is a technical application with utility in remotely helping and guiding another surgeon through the execution of a novel surgical approach. The cyberspace consultation is safe and enhances patient care through a real-time collaborative approach which extends beyond the confines of one institution and one surgeon. Aspects concerning improvement in both implementation and regulation of telementoring mandate further research and creation of nationwide guidelines.
Authors: Rebecca L Gunter; Skyler Chouinard; Sara Fernandes-Taylor; Jason T Wiseman; Sam Clarkson; Kyla Bennett; Caprice C Greenberg; K Craig Kent Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2016-02-13 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Young Jun Chai; Hyungju Kwon; Hyeong Won Yu; Su-Jin Kim; June Young Choi; Kyu Eun Lee; Yeo-Kyu Youn Journal: Int J Endocrinol Date: 2014-12-17 Impact factor: 3.257
Authors: Edgar Rojas-Muñoz; Chengyuan Lin; Natalia Sanchez-Tamayo; Maria Eugenia Cabrera; Daniel Andersen; Voicu Popescu; Juan Antonio Barragan; Ben Zarzaur; Patrick Murphy; Kathryn Anderson; Thomas Douglas; Clare Griffis; Jessica McKee; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Juan P Wachs Journal: NPJ Digit Med Date: 2020-05-21
Authors: Jadwiga Dworak; Michał Wysocki; Anna Rzepa; Michał Natkaniec; Michał Pędziwiatr; Andrzej Budzyński; Piotr Major Journal: BMC Urol Date: 2019-10-28 Impact factor: 2.264
Authors: Fan Zhang; Xiang Zhu; Jian Gao; Bingxuan Wu; Peng Liu; Pengfei Shao; Min Xu; Timothy M Pawlik; Edward W Martin; Ronald X Xu Journal: J Biomed Opt Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 3.170