Literature DB >> 23511650

Comparison of surgical outcomes after cervical laminoplasty: open-door technique versus French-door technique.

Dong-Geun Lee1, Sun-Ho Lee, Se-Jun Park, Eun-Sang Kim, Sung-Soo Chung, Chong-Suh Lee, Whan Eoh.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective case series.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the surgical outcomes of open-door and French-door cervical laminoplasty for decompressing multilevel cervical spinal cord compressions. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cervical laminoplasty is an effective method for decompressing multilevel cervical spinal cord compressions. Laminoplasty is usually classified as an open-door or French-door technique, but it is still unclear whether laminoplasty affects cervical alignment and clinical outcomes.
METHODS: Fifty-one patients underwent cervical laminoplasty over a 2-year period for cervical spondylotic myelopathy, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, or for a mixed-type condition. The following criteria were evaluated and compared retrospectively for open-door laminoplasty (group A) and French-door laminoplasty (group B): Nurick grades, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores, neck disability index, and visual analog scale scores for axial neck pain and radiating pain. During radiologic evaluations, changes in cervical lordotic angles and range of motion were measured at C2-C7.
RESULTS: Postoperatively, radiating pain improved significantly in both groups (P<0.05), but axial neck pain was more severe in both groups at last follow-up than preoperatively (P>0.05). Mean neurological improvement was 12.5% according to Nurick grades and 28% according to JOA scores in all study subjects. In particular, the mean Nurick grades showed significant improvement in group A (P<0.05), and the recovery rate was higher in group A than in group B according to Nurick grades (23.5% vs. 6.3%; P<0.05) and JOA scores (44.4% vs. 13%; P<0.05). In contrast, radiologically, cervical lordotic angle and range of motion were more significantly decreased in group B (P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Although open-door and French-door laminoplasty techniques were found to be effective for treating cervical compressive myelopathy, the open-door technique seems to be superior with respect to clinical and radiologic outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23511650     DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31828bb296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  8 in total

Review 1.  Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Open-Door Laminoplasty, French-Door Laminoplasty, Laminectomy and Fusion, and Laminectomy Alone for Multilevel Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Bayesian Network Analysis.

Authors:  Xian Li; Hui Yu; Kristian Welle; Martin Gathen; Li Zhang; Jin Xiao; Koroush Kabir
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 3.845

2.  Preliminary Experiences of the Combined Midline-Splitting French Door Laminoplasty with Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) Plate for Cervical Spondylosis and OPLL.

Authors:  Chang Hyun Oh; Gyu Yeul Ji; Junseok W Hur; Won-Seok Choi; Dong Ah Shin; Jang-Bo Lee
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2015-06-30

3.  Extensor muscle-preserving laminectomy in treating multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy compared with laminoplasty.

Authors:  Zhiming Yu; Da He; Jiachao Xiong; Zhimin Pan; Lingxuan Feng; Jiang Xu; Zhimin Han; Cristian Gragnaniello; Hisashi Koga; Kevin Phan; Parisa Azimi; Jong-Joo Lee; Yoon Ha; Kai Cao
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

4.  Expansive open-door laminoplasty secured with titanium miniplates is a good surgical method for multiple-level cervical stenosis.

Authors:  Kuang-Ting Yeh; Tzai-Chiu Yu; Ing-Ho Chen; Cheng-Huan Peng; Kuan-Lin Liu; Ru-Ping Lee; Wen-Tien Wu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Prevalence of complications after surgery in treatment for cervical compressive myelopathy: A meta-analysis for last decade.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Xiao-Ming Tian; Si-Kai Liu; Hui Wang; Ying-Ze Zhang; Wen-Yuan Ding
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Short-Term Clinical Evaluation of Enhanced Unilateral Open-Door Laminoplasty Using Titanium Mesh.

Authors:  Adiguno Suryo Wicaksono; Wiryawan Manusubroto
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-09-10

7.  Does Posterior Cervical Decompression Conducted by Junior Surgeons Affect Clinical Outcomes in the Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy? Results From a Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Narihito Nagoshi; Akio Iwanami; Norihiro Isogai; Masayuki Ishikawa; Kenya Nojiri; Takashi Tsuji; Kenshi Daimon; Ayano Takeuchi; Osahiko Tsuji; Eijiro Okada; Nobuyuki Fujita; Mitsuru Yagi; Kota Watanabe; Masaya Nakamura; Morio Matsumoto; Ken Ishii; Junichi Yamane
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-10-15

Review 8.  Comparative Effectiveness and Functional Outcome of Open-Door versus French-Door Laminoplasty for Multilevel Cervical Myelopathy: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  I Gusti Lanang Ngurah Agung Artha Wiguna; Rahadyan Magetsari; Zairin Noor; Suyitno Suyitno; Ricvan Dana Nindrea
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2019-10-13
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.