Literature DB >> 23511468

Adaptive sex allocation in anticipation of changes in offspring mating opportunities.

Andrew T Kahn1, Hanna Kokko, Michael D Jennions.   

Abstract

Sex allocation theory explains why most species produce equal numbers of sons and daughters, and highlights situations that select for deviation from this norm. Past research has, however, heavily focused on situations with discrete generations. When temporally varying generational overlap affects future mate availability, models predict cyclical shifts in sex allocation, but these predictions have not yet been appropriately tested. Here we provide evidence that mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki) populations possess a suitable life history: some autumn-born females bred alongside their own offspring, while such overlap was rare or absent for spring-born females and for all males. Our analytic model of sex allocation for these populations produced a perfect rank-order correlation between observed birth sex ratio biases and theoretical predictions, with stronger biases observed as the extent of female generational overlap increased. This is the first robust evidence that sex allocation theory accounts for cases when mating opportunities vary predictably over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23511468     DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2634

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Commun        ISSN: 2041-1723            Impact factor:   14.919


  7 in total

1.  Constraints in the evolution of sex ratio adjustment.

Authors:  Stuart A West; Ben C Sheldon
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Reproductive biology of the mosquitofish in a permanent natural lagoon in south-west Spain: two tactics for one species

Authors: 
Journal:  J Fish Biol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.051

3.  Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring.

Authors:  R L Trivers; D E Willard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-01-05       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Sex ratio variation in mammals.

Authors:  T H Clutton-Brock; G R Iason
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.875

5.  Facultative sex ratios and population dynamics.

Authors:  J H Werren; E L Charnov
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1978-03-23       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Cryptic sex-ratio bias provides indirect genetic benefits despite sexual conflict.

Authors:  Robert M Cox; Ryan Calsbeek
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Michael D Jennions
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 2.411

  7 in total
  8 in total

1.  Sex ratio variation shapes the ecological effects of a globally introduced freshwater fish.

Authors:  David C Fryxell; Heather A Arnett; Travis M Apgar; Michael T Kinnison; Eric P Palkovacs
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Can an introduced predator select for adaptive sex allocation?

Authors:  R Heinsohn; J Au; H Kokko; M H Webb; R M Deans; R Crates; D Stojanovic
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  A demographic model for sex ratio evolution and the effects of sex-biased offspring costs.

Authors:  Esther Shyu; Hal Caswell
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Are sexually selected traits affected by a poor environment early in life?

Authors:  Regina Vega-Trejo; Michael D Jennions; Megan L Head
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  The male handicap: male-biased mortality explains skewed sex ratios in brown trout embryos.

Authors:  P Morán; L Labbé; C Garcia de Leaniz
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Separating the effects of paternal age and mating history: Evidence for sex-specific paternal effect in eastern mosquitofish.

Authors:  Upama Aich; Shawan Chowdhury; Michael D Jennions
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.171

7.  Sex-specific maternal effects in a viviparous fish.

Authors:  Loeske E B Kruuk; Julianne Livingston; Andrew Kahn; Michael D Jennions
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  The effect of size and sex ratio experiences on reproductive competition in Nicrophorus vespilloides burying beetles in the wild.

Authors:  P E Hopwood; A J Moore; T Tregenza; N J Royle
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.