Literature DB >> 23511155

A simple clinical risk nomogram to predict mortality-associated geriatric complications in severely injured geriatric patients.

Lillian Min1, Sigrid Burruss, Eric Morley, Lona Mody, Jonathan R Hiatt, Henry Cryer, Jin-Kyung Ha, Areti Tillou.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to (1) identify inpatient complications associated with the greatest differential mortality risk between young and old patients with traumatic injury and (2) identify older patients at elevated risk for mortality-associated complications.
METHODS: Secondary analysis of more than 280,000 patients hospitalized for traumatic injury in 2001 to 2005 collected by the National Trauma Data Bank was performed. Predictor variables include 21 hospital complications. We used each complication to predict odds of hospital mortality, stratified by old (65+ years) versus young (18-64 years) age, controlling for age, sex, and preexisting condition count. We defined mortality-associated geriatric complications (MGCs) as complications associated with more than two times risk of mortality in older patients compared with younger patients. We then used age, comorbidity, and sex to predict development of MGCs or death.
RESULTS: We defined seven infectious and six noninfectious complications as MGCs (adjusted relative risk reduction for death associated with old age [aRRR] with 95% confidence interval [CI]): abscess (aRRR, 4.1; 95% CI, 3.6-4.5), wound infection (aRRR, 3.5; 95% CI, 3.2-3.9), empyema (aRRR, 3.4; 95% CI, 3.1, 3.8), urinary tract infection (aRRR, 3.3; 95% 3.0-3.6), pneumonia (aRRR, 3.1; 95% CI, 2.8-3.5), bacteremia (aRRR, 2.8; 95% CI, 2.6-3.0), aspiration pneumonia (aRRR, 2.6; 95% CI, 2.2-3.0), reduction/fixation failure (aRRR, 3.6; 95% CI, 3.3-3.9), pressure ulcer (aRRR, 3.3; 95% CI, 3.1-3.6), deep venous thrombosis (aRRR, 3.2; 95% CI, 2.9-3.6), pneumothorax (aRRR, 3.1; 95% CI, 2.5-3.7), and compartment syndrome (aRRR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.5-2.9). We developed a graphical nomogram based on sex, age, and number of preexisting conditions to predict risk of MGCs (c statistic, 0.74).
CONCLUSION: Older patients at risk for MGC development should be considered for targeted interventions to improve quality of care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic/epidemiologic study, level III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23511155      PMCID: PMC3693577          DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31828273a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg        ISSN: 2163-0755            Impact factor:   3.313


  33 in total

1.  Young versus old: factors affecting mortality after blunt traumatic injury.

Authors:  Andrew M Schulman; Jeffrey A Claridge; Jeffrey S Young
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 0.688

Review 2.  Practice management guidelines for geriatric trauma: the EAST Practice Management Guidelines Work Group.

Authors:  David G Jacobs; Brian Ray Plaisier; Philip S Barie; Jeffrey S Hammond; Michele R Holevar; Karlene E Sinclair; Thomas M Scalea; Wendy Wahl
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2003-02

3.  Outcomes of admitted geriatric trauma victims.

Authors:  P C Ferrera; J M Bartfield; C C D'Andrea
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.469

4.  The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care.

Authors:  S P Baker; B O'Neill; W Haddon; W B Long
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1974-03

5.  Comorbidity-polypharmacy scoring facilitates outcome prediction in older trauma patients.

Authors:  David C Evans; Charles H Cook; Jonathan M Christy; Claire V Murphy; Anthony T Gerlach; Daniel Eiferman; David E Lindsey; Melissa L Whitmill; Thomas J Papadimos; Paul R Beery; Steven M Steinberg; Stanislaw P A Stawicki
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Characteristics and outcomes of serious traumatic injury in older adults.

Authors:  Therese S Richmond; Donald Kauder; Neville Strumpf; Tammy Meredith
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Low-impact falls: demands on a system of trauma management, prediction of outcome, and influence of comorbidities.

Authors:  R L Kennedy; P T Grant; D Blackwell
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2001-10

8.  Evaluating trauma care: the TRISS method. Trauma Score and the Injury Severity Score.

Authors:  C R Boyd; M A Tolson; W S Copes
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1987-04

9.  Hospital costs associated with surgical complications: a report from the private-sector National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  Justin B Dimick; Steven L Chen; Paul A Taheri; William G Henderson; Shukri F Khuri; Darrell A Campbell
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  Trauma in the elderly: intensive care unit resource use and outcome.

Authors:  Michelle D Taylor; J Kathleen Tracy; Walter Meyer; Michael Pasquale; Lena M Napolitano
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2002-09
View more
  2 in total

1.  Scoring severity in trauma: comparison of prehospital scoring systems in trauma ICU patients.

Authors:  J A Llompart-Pou; M Chico-Fernández; M Sánchez-Casado; R Salaberria-Udabe; C Carbayo-Górriz; F Guerrero-López; J González-Robledo; M Á Ballesteros-Sanz; R Herrán-Monge; L Servià-Goixart; R León-López; E Val-Jordán
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 2.  Severe trauma in the geriatric population.

Authors:  Juan Antonio Llompart-Pou; Jon Pérez-Bárcena; Mario Chico-Fernández; Marcelino Sánchez-Casado; Joan Maria Raurich
Journal:  World J Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-05-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.