Literature DB >> 23511132

Timing of tracheostomy after anterior cervical spine fixation.

Ranjith Babu1, Timothy R Owens, Steven Thomas, Isaac O Karikari, Betsy H Grunch, Jessica R Moreno, Shivanand P Lad, Carlos A Bagley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with cervical spinal cord injury frequently undergo early anterior cervical spine fixation (ACSF) and tracheostomy procedures to reduce further deterioration, to reduce risk of pulmonary complications, and to improve patient mobilization. However, tracheostomy is often delayed because of the risk of cross contamination as a result of the proximity to the ACSF incision site. Currently, there is a paucity of studies evaluating this outcome to determine the safety of early tracheostomy after ACSF. In this study, we have evaluated the outcomes and complications associated with early tracheostomy placement.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent tracheostomy placement and ACSF during the same hospitalization between 2005 and 2010. A variety of patient and procedural data were collected, including demographics, timing of ACSF and tracheostomy, length of hospitalization, indication for surgery, American Spinal Injuries Association and Glasgow Coma Scale scores on admission, reason for tracheostomy, method of tracheostomy, and complications.
RESULTS: Of the 1,184 patients who underwent an ACSF, 20 (1.7%) required a postfixation tracheostomy. Tracheostomy was performed at mean (SD) of 6.9 (4.2) days after ACSF, ranging from 0 to 17 days. Although nearly half of all patients underwent postfixation tracheostomy within 6 days, no wound or implant infection was seen to occur in any patient. Ten patients (50%) developed ventilator-associated pneumonia, with most cases occurring before tracheostomy (90% vs. 10%, p < 0.0001). Univariate analysis only revealed late tracheostomy to significantly increase the risk of complications (odds ratio, 9.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-73.0; p = 0.033). Analysis of all studies in the literature revealed a 1% cross-infection rate, with no cases involving implant contamination.
CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that early tracheostomy can be performed safely after cervical spine fixation surgery, with no patients developing incisional or implant infections. As the risk of cross contamination is only 1%, early tracheostomy should be strongly considered because of its potential benefits. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management, level IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23511132     DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182826ea4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg        ISSN: 2163-0755            Impact factor:   3.313


  5 in total

1.  Tracheostomy following anterior cervical spine fusion in trauma patients.

Authors:  Harald Binder; Nikolaus Lang; Thomas M Tiefenboeck; Adam Bukaty; Stefan Hajdu; Kambiz Sarahrudi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  A review article on the benefits of early mobilization following spinal surgery and other medical/surgical procedures.

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2014-04-16

3.  Surgical Site Infection in Spine Surgery: Who Is at Risk?

Authors:  Reina Yao; Hanbing Zhou; Theodore J Choma; Brian K Kwon; John Street
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-12-13

Review 4.  Respiratory management in the patient with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Rita Galeiras Vázquez; Pedro Rascado Sedes; Mónica Mourelo Fariña; Antonio Montoto Marqués; M Elena Ferreiro Velasco
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Risk factors and the surgery affection of respiratory complication and its mortality after acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Xiao-Xiong Yang; Zong-Qiang Huang; Zhong-Hai Li; Dong-Feng Ren; Jia-Guang Tang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.889

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.