Literature DB >> 23510493

Efficacy of initiating therapy with amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide or their combination in hypertensive Nigerians.

Godfrey B S Iyalomhe1, Eric K I Omogbai, Ambrose O Isah, Osigbemhe O B Iyalomhe, Folorunso L Dada, Sarah I Iyalomhe.   

Abstract

In order to evaluate whether amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide would be preferable to initiate therapy, 90 untreated hypertensive Nigerians of both genders aged 31-86 years with blood pressure >160/90 and ≤180/120 mm Hg were recruited into a randomized 48-week study. Patients, 30 each in amlodipine, hydrochlorothiazide, and amlodipine-hydrochlorothiazide groups, were treated, respectively, with amlodipine 5 mg for 6 weeks and the dose increased to 10 mg till week 12, after which hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg was added; hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg till week 6, after which amlodipine 5-10 mg was added; and amlodipine 5-10 mg + hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg. Body mass index, blood pressure, heart rate, and 24-hour urine volume were evaluated at baseline and at the end of weeks 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48. The primary efficacy variables were decreased in mean trough sitting diastolic and systolic blood pressure such that blood pressure < 140/90 mm Hg was regarded as normalized. At week 48 in the amlodipine group, 27 patients versus 25 patients in the hydrochlorothiazide group had diastolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg (90% vs. 83.3%; P <.03). In the amlodipine group, 23 patients versus 20 patients in the hydrochlorothiazide group had blood pressure < 140/90 mm Hg (76.7% vs. 66.7%; P <.01). In the amlodipine-hydrochlorothiazide group, 27 patients (90%) and 15 patients (50%) had diastolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg and blood pressure < 140/90 mm Hg, respectively. This study has demonstrated that a regimen of amlodipine to which hydrochlorothiazide is subsequently added provides superior efficacy on blood pressure control when compared with a regimen of hydrochlorothiazide to which amlodipine is subsequently added or with ab initio amlodipine-hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23510493     DOI: 10.3109/10641963.2013.776570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Hypertens        ISSN: 1064-1963            Impact factor:   1.749


  4 in total

1.  Monotherapy with amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide in patients with mild to moderate hypertension: Comparison of their efficacy and effects on electrolytes.

Authors:  Daniel C Nwachukwu; Anthonius A Eze; Nkiru Z Nwachukwu; Eddy I Aneke; Polycarp U Agu; Nkiru C Azubike; Leonard Fo Obika; Onochie I Okoye
Journal:  Malawi Med J       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 0.875

2.  The coArtHA trial-identifying the most effective treatment strategies to control arterial hypertension in sub-Saharan Africa: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Thilo Burkard; Maja Weisser; Herry Mapesi; Ravi Gupta; Herieth Ismael Wilson; Blaise Lukau; Alain Amstutz; Aza Lyimo; Josephine Muhairwe; Elizabeth Senkoro; Theonestina Byakuzana; Madavida Mphunyane; Moniek Bresser; Tracy Renée Glass; Mark Lambiris; Günther Fink; Winfrid Gingo; Manuel Battegay; Daniel Henry Paris; Martin Rohacek; Fiona Vanobberghen; Niklaus Daniel Labhardt
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 3.  Pathophysiologically based antihypertensive pharmacotherapeutics rationality, efficacy and safety in Sub Saharan African Nations - A review.

Authors:  A A L Ajayi; O E Ajayi
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev       Date:  2021-10-28

4.  Pharmacotherapy for hypertension in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anna Seeley; Josephine Prynn; Rachel Perera; Rebecca Street; Daniel Davis; Anthony O Etyang
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 8.775

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.