Literature DB >> 23510464

Validation of a chronotype questionnaire including an amplitude dimension.

Fabrice Dosseville1, Sylvain Laborde, Romain Lericollais.   

Abstract

The aim of this paper was to validate a French version of the Chronotype Questionnaire (Ogińska, 2011, Pers. Individ. Dif. 50:1039-1043), which represents an interesting novelty in the psychometric assessment of chronotype, because it comprises not only an assessment of the morningness-eveningness (ME) dimension, but also a distinctness (DI) dimension (i.e., amplitude), which represents the range of diurnal variation. In study 1, we aimed to confirm the structure of the Chronotype Questionnaire, with two different samples, young adults (n = 338, mean ± SD = 18.70 ± 1.12 yrs, 244 men and 94 women) and old adults (n = 477, mean ± SD = 55.92 ± 11.9 yrs, 168 men and 310 women). The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated a poor fit in both samples as well as in the whole sample, which could be due to some inconsistencies in the original instrument, above all in the distinctness dimension. We therefore decided to revise the Chronotype Questionnaire, keeping the ME dimension, but refining the DI dimension. In study 2, with a new sample of 197 participants (mean ± SD = 22.71 ± 2.23 yrs, 105 men and 92 women), we examined the factor structure of the revised scale containing 18 items. The resulting questionnaire contained 16 items (i.e., 8 items on each scale), with item factor loadings higher than .45. In study 3, we aimed to confirm the factor structure of the instrument developed in study 2 as well as to examine its convergent validity, with a new sample of 158 participants (mean ± SD = 55.92 ± 11.9 yrs, 97 men and 61 women). Results of the CFA showed that a good fit of the model could be obtained with 16 items in the questionnaire. The new questionnaire derived from the original Chronotype Questionnaire was from now on called the Caen Chronotype Questionnaire (CCQ). Convergence validity was obtained with the Horne and Östberg questionnaire and the ME scale of the CCQ, showing a negative significant relationship (r = -.82). The CCQ showed promising psychometric qualities, and further research should aim to combine it with physiological variables.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23510464     DOI: 10.3109/07420528.2012.763042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chronobiol Int        ISSN: 0742-0528            Impact factor:   2.877


  5 in total

1.  Higher evening metabolic responses contribute to diurnal variation of self-paced cycling performance.

Authors:  Wajdi Souissi; Omar Hammouda; Achraf Ammar; Mohamed Ayachi; Yasmine Bardiaa; Omayma Daoud; Imen Ben Hassen; Mohamed Souissi; Tarak Driss
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 2.806

2.  Neuroimaging of chronotype, sleep quality and daytime sleepiness: Structural T1-weighted magnetic resonance brain imaging data from 136 young adults.

Authors:  Michal Rafal Zareba; Magdalena Fafrowicz; Tadeusz Marek; Ewa Beldzik; Halszka Oginska; Anna Beres; Piotr Faba; Justyna Janik; Koryna Lewandowska; Monika Ostrogorska; Barbara Sikora-Wachowicz; Aleksandra Zyrkowska; Aleksandra Domagalik
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2022-02-15

Review 3.  Association between Chronotype, Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Nuria Sempere-Rubio; Mariam Aguas; Raquel Faubel
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Factorial Structure of the Morningness-Eveningness-Stability-Scale (MESSi) and Sex and Age Invariance.

Authors:  Paula Vagos; Pedro F S Rodrigues; Josefa N S Pandeirada; Ali Kasaeian; Corina Weidenauer; Carlos F Silva; Christoph Randler
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-01-17

5.  Time Perspective and Bedtime Procrastination: The Role of the Chronotype-Time Perspective Relationship.

Authors:  Dexin Meng; Ying Zhao; Jing Guo; Huiying Xu; Yiming Fu; Xiaohan Ma; Liwei Zhu; Li Mu
Journal:  Nat Sci Sleep       Date:  2021-07-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.