| Literature DB >> 23510104 |
Kirsten Stoebenau1, Rama C Nair, Valérie Rambeloson, Paul Ghislain Rakotoarison, Violette Razafintsalama, Ronald Labonté.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ethnographic evidence suggests that transactional sex is sometimes motivated by youth's interest in the consumption of modern goods as much as it is in basic survival. There are very few quantitative studies that examine the association between young people's interests in the consumption of modern goods and their sexual behaviour. We examined this association in two regions and four residence zones of Madagascar: urban, peri-urban and rural Antananarivo, and urban Antsiranana. We expected risky sexual behaviour would be associated with interests in consuming modern goods or lifestyles; urban residence; and socio-cultural characteristics.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23510104 PMCID: PMC3651287 DOI: 10.1186/1744-8603-9-13
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Global Health ISSN: 1744-8603 Impact factor: 4.185
Population-based survey sample size by study site, Madagascar, 2009-10
| Type of residence | | | |
| Urban | 625 | 380 | 1005 |
| Peri-Urban | 625 | - | 625 |
| Rural | 625 | - | 625 |
| Total | 1875 | 380 | 2255 |
Selected characteristics for young men (ages 15–24) by region and type of residence, Madagascar (2009)
| | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean Age [SD] | 18.7 [2.68] | 18.5 [2.72] | 18.9 [2.69] | 18.5 [2.70] |
| In union (legally married or common law) (%) | 9.9 | 7.4 | 8.9 | 6.5 |
| Household composition (%) | | | | |
| Lives with at least one parent | 78.4 | 80.3 | 70.3 | 57.5 |
| Lives with spouse/partner | 8.3 | 7.4 | 11.0 | 9.0 |
| Lives with other family/non-family | 13.3 | 12.3 | 18.7 | 33.5 |
| Region of origin- | 97.2 | 86.2 | 84.1 | 10.5 |
| Mean highest level of Education [SD] | 6.8 [2.70] | 7.8 [2.95] | 9.0 [3.06] | 9.0 [2.57] |
| Median Expenditures last mth (in 1000 MGA) [IQR] | 24 [4, 60] | 15 [4, 45] | 20 [6.8, 60] | 10 [4, 30] |
| Receives money from parents (%) | 16.1 | 49.3 | 64.9 | 75.5 |
| Household in 2 poorest quintiles (%) | 86.1 | 26.5 | 21.8 | 10.0 |
| Have ever had sex (%) | 43.8 | 46.5 | 58.3 | 61.5 |
| Had two or more sex partners in last 12 months (%) | 32.2 | 23.1 | 32.5 | 34.8 |
| Used their cell phone yesterday (%) | 9.6 | 13.9 | 21.5 | 32.0 |
| Fashionable items obtained in last six months (%) | | | | |
| 0 items | 39.5 | 24.3 | 9.5 | 39.0 |
| 1-3 items | 51.9 | 45.2 | 43.6 | 37.0 |
| 4 + items | 8.6 | 30.5 | 46.9 | 24.0 |
| Used internet in last six months (%) | 2.8 | 6.8 | 30.4 | 19.0 |
| Went to nightclub in last six months (%) | 4.9 | 7.7 | 12.0 | 18.5 |
| Drank alcohol in last 4 weeks (%) | 39.5 | 21.2 | 23.0 | 28.0 |
| | | | | |
| I am fashionable (%) | | | | |
| Rarely/Never | 87.7 | 80.6 | 97.9 | 80.0 |
| Sometimes | 6.2 | 13.5 | 1.5 | 7.5 |
| For Parties/Often/Always | 6.2 | 5.9 | 0.6 | 12.5 |
| Fashion is important (%): | | | | |
| Not at all | 64.5 | 44.9 | 38.7 | 55.0 |
| Somewhat | 31.2 | 47.1 | 54.9 | 36.0 |
| Important/Very Important | 4.3 | 8.0 | 6.4 | 9.0 |
Selected characteristics for young women (ages 15–24) by region and type of residence, Madagascar (2009)
| | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean Age [SD] | 18.2 [2.66] | 18.5 [2.69] | 18.8 [2.75] | 18.6 [2.67] |
| In union (legally married or common law) (%) | 28.2 | 24.0 | 18.1 | 15.6 |
| Household composition (%) | | | | |
| Lives with at least one parent | 63.8 | 61.7 | 58.9 | 41.7 |
| Lives with spouse/partner | 25.9 | 23.7 | 17.7 | 18.3 |
| Lives with other family/non-family | 10.3 | 14.7 | 23.4 | 40.0 |
| Region of origin- | 93.4 | 88.0 | 78.6 | 6.7 |
| Mean highest level of Education [SD] | 6.7 [2.71] | 7.6 [3.25] | 8.6 [3.30] | 8.3 [2.96] |
| Median Expenditures last mth (in 1000 MGA) [IQR] | 18 [2, 60] | 20 [4, 78] | 20 [5.6, 48] | 21.5 [9.3, 81] |
| Receives money from parents (%) | 30.7 | 43.8 | 42.9 | 41.7 |
| Household in 2 poorest quintiles (%) | 81.4 | 34.7 | 24.8 | 12.8 |
| Have ever had sex (%) | 42.9 | 47.3 | 41.8 | 61.7 |
| Had two or more sex partners in last 12 months (%) | 1.8 | 3.9 | 5.5 | 19.4 |
| Have ever had sex in order to receive goods/money (%) | 0.0 | 4.9 | 0.80 | 19.8 |
| Used their cell phone yesterday (%) | 12.6 | 15.3 | 25.1 | 33.9 |
| Fashionable items obtained in last six months (%) | | | | |
| 0 items | 21.6 | 24.3 | 22.7 | 35.6 |
| 1-3 items | 54.5 | 43.3 | 42.8 | 36.1 |
| 4 + items | 23.9 | 32.3 | 34.5 | 28.3 |
| Used internet in last six months (%) | 2.3 | 7.0 | 19.4 | 11.7 |
| Went to nightclub in last six months (%) | 0.7 | 2.3 | 5.4 | 8.3 |
| Drank alcohol in last 4 weeks (%) | 5.6 | 3.3 | 7.7 | 1.7 |
| | | | | |
| I am fashionable (%) | | | | |
| Rarely/Never | 74.8 | 75.3 | 82.9 | 73.9 |
| Sometimes | 13.3 | 5.0 | 14.4 | 19.4 |
| For parties/Often/Always | 12.0 | 19.7 | 2.7 | 6.7 |
| Fashion is important(%): | | | | |
| Not at all | 27.9 | 59.3 | 55.5 | 55.0 |
| Somewhat | 55.8 | 38.0 | 32.1 | 39.4 |
| Important/Very Important | 16.3 | 2.7 | 12.4 | 5.6 |
Association between consumption and sexual behaviour for young men and women (ages 15–24), Antananarivo and Antsiranana, Madagascar, 2009
| | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | |||||||||
| | |||||||||
| | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
| I am fashionable | | | | | | | | | |
| Rarely/Never | 79.2 | | 85.3 | 51.5 | | 75.8 | 53.3 | | 75.3 |
| Sometimes | 12.3 | + | 7.8 | *** | 13.1 | 23.3 | + | 14.1 | |
| For Parties/Often/Always | 8.4 | | 6.9 | + | 11.2 | ** | 10.7 | ||
| Fashion is important: | | | | | | | | | |
| Not at all | 37.1 | | 45.0 | 27.3 | | 48.7 | 33.3 | | 49.1 |
| Somewhat | 48.7 | | 47.6 | ** | 41.8 | 56.7 | + | 41.5 | |
| Important/Very Important | ** | 7.5 | 12.1 | | 9.5 | 10.0 | | 9.4 | |
| Cell phone use yesterday | ** | 23.3 | *** | 22.8 | 36.7 | + | 21.6 | ||
| Drank alcohol in last 4 weeks | *** | 35.7 | *** | 5.5 | 10.0 | | 6.5 | ||
| Fashionable items obtained in last six months: | | | | | | | | | |
| 0 | 19.5 | | 29.4 | 24.3 | | 29.5 | 40.0 | | 29.2 |
| 1 to 3 items | 39.6 | | 40.6 | 24.3 | | 41.1 | ** | 40.9 | |
| More than 4 items | *** | 30.0 | 51.5 | | 29.5 | 40.0 | | 30.0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Used the internet | ** | 13.8 | *** | 6.7 | 13.3 | | 7.6 | ||
| Went to a nightclub | *** | 12.4 | *** | 4.3 | *** | 4.6 | |||
| Got to know a foreigner | 1.3 | 0.3 | *** | 1.9 | *** | 2.1 | |||
*Indicates statistical significance for those categories or variables that predict sexual behaviour outcomes in bivariate logistic regression models.
+p < .1 **p < .05 ***p < .01.
Sexual behaviour by ethnic origin and current residence among young men and women (ages 15–24) in Antananarivo and Antsiranana, Madagascar, 2009
| | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| | | ||
| 28.5 | 2.0 | 1.8 | |
| | (n = 347) | (n = 303) | (n = 335) |
| Other origin | 35.7 | 17.9 | 14.0 |
| | (n = 154) | (n = 151) | (n = 172) |
| 30.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| | (n = 126) | (n = 80) | (n = 88) |
| Other origin | 41.9 | 20.7 | 2.7 |
| | (n = 31) | (n = 29) | (n = 37) |
| 20.6 | 2.8 | 5.0 | |
| | (n = 97) | (n = 109) | (n = 119) |
| Other origin | 35% | 10.5 | 4.4 |
| | (n = 20) | (n = 19) | (n = 23) |
| 33.0 | 1.9 | 0.0 | |
| | (n = 112) | (n = 108) | (n = 122) |
| Other origin | 35.0 | 19.6 | 21.0 |
| (n = 100) | (n = 97) | (n = 97) | |
Note: “n” reflects denominator.
Multivariate logistic regression models examining the odds of reporting having had multiple partners in the last 12 months or having ever engaged in transactional sex for young men and women (ages 15–24) in Antananarivo and Antsiranana, Madagascar (2009)
| | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | ||||||
| | | | | | | |
| Peri-Urban | (0.297 – 0.904) | 1.014 | (0.245 – 4.197) | – | | |
| Rural | 1.036 | (0.544 – 1.970) | 2.179 | (0.303 – 15.68) | – | |
| Region of origin (Ref = | – | | (2.109 – 24.66) | (3.735 – 37.74) | ||
| | | | | | | |
| Sometimes | – | | 2.665 | (0.678 – 10.48) | (1.559 – 26.90) | |
| For parties/Often/Always | – | | 1.295 | (0.308 – 5.449) | 2.436 | (0.572 – 10.37) |
| | | | | | | |
| Somewhat | 1.176 | (0.754 – 1.833) | 1.761 | (0.556 – 5.582) | 1.894 | (0.578 – 6.209) |
| Important/Very Important | 1.670 | (0.822 – 3.393) | 0.503 | (0.065 – 3.877) | 0.273 | (0.0306 – 2.432) |
| Used their cell phone yesterday | – | | 1.556 | (0.568 – 4.263) | 1.684 | (0.522 – 5.436) |
| Consumed alcohol in last 4 weeks | (0.969 – 2.273) | (1.282 – 21.59) | – | | ||
| | | | | | | |
| Used the Internet | – | | (1.095 – 22.01) | – | | |
| Frequented nightclub | (1.296 – 3.736) | (1.496 – 18.75) | (1.779 – 56.41) | |||
| Got to know a foreigner | – | | (1.235 – 24.07) | (1.955 – 108.0) | ||
| | | | | | | |
| 1–3 | – | | – | | (0.0883 – 1.197) | |
| 4 or more | – | | – | | 0.659 | (0.176 – 2.460) |
| Age | 1.022 | (0.928 – 1.126) | (0.624 – 0.957) | 0.983 | (0.804 – 1.202) | |
| Highest Education Attained | 0.968 | (0.896 – 1.046) | (0.663 – 0.934) | (0.629 – 0.919) | ||
| | | | | | | |
| Lives with spouse | (0.314 – 1.087) | 1.357 | (0.332 – 5.538) | 0.463 | (0.140 – 1.529) | |
| Lives with other family/non-family | 0.928 | (0.531 – 1.622) | 1.486 | (0.415 – 5.324) | 0.339 | (0.0853 – 1.345) |
| 1.329 | (0.740 – 2.386) | (1.392 – 35.06) | 1.652 | (0.507 – 5.383) | ||
| Receives pocket money from Parents | 0.933 | (0.524 – 1.661) | 0.478 | (0.140 – 1.631) | (0.000518 – 0.120) | |
| | | | | | | |
| 18,000–49,000 | (0.949 – 2.915) | – | | – | | |
| 50,000–99,000 | 1.324 | (0.716 – 2.446) | – | | – | |
| > = 100,000 | (1.489 – 6.475) | – | – | |||
*** p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05, + p < 0.1.