Literature DB >> 2350999

Transducer manometry and the effect of body position on anal canal pressures.

G P Johnson1, J H Pemberton, J Ness, M Samson, A R Zinsmeister.   

Abstract

Anal canal manometry is performed conventionally with balloons, sleeves, perfused or nonperfused open-tipped catheters, or with multiport probes. The authors constructed a new manometer with four transducers embedded in a probe (15 mm outside diameter) and oriented radially, 90 degrees apart. The transducer probe was validated in 27 healthy volunteers by comparing its performance to that of a standard four-port perfused manometer and then used to measure anal canal and rectal pressures in body positions more physiologic (standing, sitting) than that usually employed (left lateral) for such measurements. Both devices measured similar anal canal resting pressure in the left lateral position (mid canal, 58 +/- 3 mm Hg perfused vs. 62 +/- 4 mm Hg transducer; P greater than 0.05). The transducer probe, however, recorded higher squeeze pressures (mid canal, 100 +/- 6 mm Hg perfused vs. 143 +/- 14 mm Hg transducer; P less than 0.05). The transducer probe detected higher intrarectal and resting anal canal pressures when subjects were standing or sitting, compared with the left lateral position (rectum, 3 +/- 1 mm Hg left lateral; 17 +/- 2 mm Hg standing; 20 +/- 1 mm Hg sitting; P less than 0.05; mid anal canal, 57 +/- 3 mm Hg left lateral; 86 +/- 4 mm Hg standing; 81 +/- 5 mm Hg sitting, P less than 0.05). The rise in resting anal canal pressure was uniform circumferentially. Neither anal canal length nor squeeze pressure changed with change in position. The authors concluded that 1) transducer manometry recorded similar resting but higher squeeze pressures compared with perfused manometry; 2) transducer manometry recorded the same radial variation in anal canal resting and squeeze pressures as that recorded by the perfused manometer; and 3) standing and sitting caused a four-fold rise in intrarectal pressure, which was associated with a concomitant rise in resting anal canal pressure.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2350999     DOI: 10.1007/bf02052140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  6 in total

Review 1.  The usefulness of tests in anorectal disease.

Authors:  T G Parks
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  The trigger for rectal filling sensation.

Authors:  P M Broens; F M Penninckx; B Lestár; R P Kerremans
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Role of body position, gender, and age on pelvic floor location and mobility.

Authors:  F I Habib; E Corazziari; A Viscardi; D Badiali; A Torsoli
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Improving the utility of high-resolution manometry for the diagnosis of defecatory disorders in women with chronic constipation.

Authors:  Mayank Sharma; Anjani Muthyala; Kelly Feuerhak; Susrutha Puthanmadhom Narayanan; Kent R Bailey; Adil E Bharucha
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 5.  Review of the indications, methods, and clinical utility of anorectal manometry and the rectal balloon expulsion test.

Authors:  Adil E Bharucha; Guido Basilisco; Allison Malcolm; Tae Hee Lee; Matthew B Hoy; S Mark Scott; Satish S C Rao
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2022-02-27       Impact factor: 3.960

6.  The position of the patient does not adversely influence the results of the most clinically important measurements of anorectal function.

Authors:  K Yoshioka; M R Keighley
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.571

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.