| Literature DB >> 23509805 |
Salik Hussain1, Jeroen A J Vanoirbeek, Steven Haenen, Vincent Haufroid, Sonja Boland, Francelyne Marano, Benoit Nemery, Peter H M Hoet.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Gold- (Au-) based nanomaterials have shown promising potential in nanomedicine. The individual health status is an important determinant of the response to injury/exposure. It is, therefore, critical to evaluate exposure to Au-nanomaterials with varied preexisting health status.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23509805 PMCID: PMC3581283 DOI: 10.1155/2013/923475
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Experimental design. Animals (n = 4) were given 10 μL of LPS or its vehicle (HBSS) on day 1 by oropharyngeal route. On day 2, animals were administered 40 μL of NP suspension or vehicle for NPs (2.5 mM trisodium citrate) by the same route. Twenty four hours later, animals were weighed and sacrificed, organs were collected, wet organ weights were measured, and samples were processed for ICP-MS analysis.
Figure 2Characterization of Au NPs after suspension in 2.5 mm sodium citrate. (a) Transmission electron microscopic (TEM) image of 40 nm Au NPs. Inset shows a single particle at higher magnification (bar 20 nm). Box indicating ζ potential of these Au NP suspensions (in 2.5 mM sodium citrate) and particle number per mL. (b) Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) analysis of Au nanoparticle suspension showing single population of Au nanoparticles, having 40 nm hydrodynamic diameter.
Figure 3Body distribution of Au NPs with or without pretreatment with LPS. The concentration of Au NPs (μg·g−1 relative organ weight) in lungs (a) in different secondary organs (b) of animals with or without pretreatment with LPS. ∗ represents statistically different from respective (saline/LPS) control group without NPs and † represents statistically different from NP-treated group without LPS, P < 0.05 (two tailed). ***P < 0.01 and ††† P < 0.01.
Figure 4Schematic overview of the results presented in this study.