| Literature DB >> 23509743 |
Jennifer Nelson1, Kristen Barlow, D Olin Beck, Amanda Berbert, Nathan Eshenroder, Lyndee Francom, Mark Pruitt, Kina Thompson, Kyle Thompson, Brian Thurber, Celestine H-Y Yeung, Allan M Judd, John D Bell.
Abstract
Healthy cells typically resist hydrolysis catalyzed by snake venom secretory phospholipase A2. However, during various forms of programmed cell death, they become vulnerable to attack by the enzyme. This observation raises the question of whether the specificity of the enzyme for dying cells could be used as a strategy to eliminate tumor cells that have been intoxicated but not directly killed by chemotherapeutic agents. This idea was tested with S49 lymphoma cells and a broad range of antineoplastic drugs: methotrexate, daunorubicin, actinomycin D, and paclitaxel. In each case, a substantial population of treated cells was still alive yet vulnerable to attack by the enzyme. Induction of cell death by these agents also perturbed the biophysical properties of the membrane as detected by merocyanine 540 and trimethylammonium-diphenylhexatriene. These results suggest that exposure of lymphoma cells to these drugs universally causes changes to the cell membrane that render it susceptible to enzymatic attack. The data also argue that the snake venom enzyme is not only capable of clearing cell corpses but can aid in the demise of tumor cells that have initiated but not yet completed the death process.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23509743 PMCID: PMC3591165 DOI: 10.1155/2013/565287
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Evolution of “alive and susceptible” cell population during methotrexate-induced cell death. The percentage of the total cell population that was alive and susceptible to sPLA2 was assayed using propidium iodide at 1 h intervals during the apoptotic process (n = 3–5 for each methotrexate time point, n = 36 for control) as explained in Section 2.
Figure 2Comparison of maximum percentage of observed “alive and susceptible” population for cells treated with paclitaxel, actinomycin D, methotrexate, and daunorubicin. Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance followed by a Dunnett's posttest comparing methotrexate (n = 7), actinomycin D (n = 9), paclitaxel (n = 3), and daunorubicin (n = 4) to control (n = 21). The overall effect of treatment was significant (P < 0.0001) with all treatments differing individually from the control (P < 0.05).
Figure 3Effect of chemotherapeutic agents on MC540 fluorescence intensity. Cells were incubated with control vehicle or each agent and then harvested at the time when the alive and susceptible population reached a maximum. MC540 was added and assayed as described in Section 2. Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance followed by a Dunnett's post test comparing methotrexate (n = 3), actinomycin D (n = 6), paclitaxel (n = 3), and daunorubicin (n = 8) to control (n = 54). The overall effect of treatment was significant (P < 0.0001) with all treatments differing individually from the control (P < 0.05).
Figure 4Effect of chemotherapeutic agents on TMA-DPH anisotropy. Cells were incubated with control vehicle or each agent and then harvested at the time when alive and susceptible population reached a maximum. TMA-DPH was added and anisotropy was assayed as described in Section 2. Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance followed by a Dunnett's posttest comparing methotrexate (n = 3), actinomycin D (n = 6), paclitaxel (n = 3), and daunorubicin (n = 3) to control (n = 10). The overall effect of treatment was significant (P = 0.0006) with all treatments differing individually from the control (P < 0.05).