Literature DB >> 23509635

Case series of monoamniotic and pseudomonoamniotic twin gestations.

Shunji Suzuki1.   

Abstract

We retrospectively evaluated a series of 18 monoamniotic and 7 pseudomonoamniotic (secondary to rupture in the membrane dividing monochorionic diamniotic twins) twin gestations managed after 20 weeks' gestation. There were no significant differences in the incidence of neonatal death or umbilical cord entanglement between the monoamniotic and pseudomonoamniotic twin gestations (33 versus 21%, P = 0.94 and 72 versus 43%, P = 0.36). Therefore, the same serious management may be needed for pseudomonoamniotic twin gestations as for monoamniotic twin gestations.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23509635      PMCID: PMC3595717          DOI: 10.1155/2013/369419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ISRN Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 2090-4436


1. Introduction

Monoamniotic twinning is a rare complication, occurring in less than 1% of monozygosity and is associated with a significant mortality rate [1, 2]. The most common cause of perinatal mortality in monoamniotic twins has been reported to be cord entanglement [1, 2]. Cord entanglement has been reported in up to 70% of monoamniotic twins with 50% or more of deaths attributed to this complication [3]. Recently, some cases of disruption of the dividing membrane in monochorionic diamniotic twin gestation as pseudomonoamniotic twin gestation [4-13]. In some previous reports, pseudomonoamniotic twin gestation sometimes has been also observed to be complicated by umbilical cord entanglement. In addition, some cases of monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy complicated by spontaneous antepartum rupture of the intertwin-dividing membrane (and umbilical cord entanglement) without any perinatal episodes have been reported [12, 13]; however, there have been few investigations comparing the perinatal outcomes in pseudomonoamniotic twins with those in true monoamniotic twins. Therefore, in this study, we examined the perinatal outcomes of these pregnancies.

2. Methods

We retrospectively evaluated a series of 18 monoamniotic and 7 pseudomonoamniotic twin gestations managed after 20 weeks' gestation at our hospital (these contain the cases we reported previously [6–8, 14]). The diagnosis of monoamnionicity and pseudomonoamnionicity was determined on the basis of ultrasound features and it was confirmed by clinical presentations at delivery, such as the presence of disruption of the dividing membrane and histological examination of the placenta. The histology of the placenta and umbilical cord entanglement were examined at the time of delivery. Cases of congenital anomalies such as anencephaly and acardiac twins were excluded. In addition, the pregnancies were excluded, if fetal demise at least one twin at <20 weeks' gestation was diagnosed. The gestational age of the pregnancies was established by ultrasonographic examination of the fetal crown-rump length at 8–11 weeks' gestation. In our hospitals, elective cesarean at preterm for (true and pseudo-) monoamniotic twin gestations as previously reported [15, 16] was not performed without maternal request, if fetuses were well and the patient had no maternal complications. In monoamniotic twin gestations, twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) was diagnosed with the clinical presentations, such as cardiac dysfunction, discordance in bladder size, and/or polyhydramnios. Cases and controls were compared by the χ 2 or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Differences with P < 0.05 were considered significant.

3. Results

Table 1 shows the summary of perinatal findings in the 18 (true) monoamniotic twin gestations. The incidence of perinatal loss per total number of neonates was 33% (12/36). Four cases (22%) resulted in double death, while 4 (22%) cases resulted in single death. The incidence of cerebral injury per total number of lived neonates was 13% (3/24). The incidence of umbilical cord entanglement was 72% (13/18). There were no cases of severe congenital heart anomalies. Based on the clinical presentations, 2 cases (11%: cases 4 and 9) were suggested to be complicated by TTTS.
Table 1

Summary of perinatal findings in 18 monoamniotic twin gestations.

NumberGA at deliveryTwin ATwin BUC entanglementOther complications
120IUFDIUFDYes
222IUFDIUFDYes
328CPIUFDYes
428Neonatal deathIUFD (22 weeks)NoOligohydramnios following polyhydramnios
529CPHealthyYesHydrops
630IUFD (26 weeks)HealthyYes
731HealthyHealthyYes
832HealthyHealthyNo
932IUFD (28 weeks)PVLNoHydrops (IUFD), polyhydramnios
1033IUFDIUFDYes
1134HealthyHealthyYes
1235HealthyHealthyYes
1336HealthyHealthyYes
1436HealthyHealthyYes
1537HealthyHealthyYes
1637HealthyHealthyNo
1738HealthyHealthyYes
1839HealthyIUFD (20 weeks)No

GA: gestational age; UC: umbilical cord; IUFD: intrauterine fetal death; CP: cerebral palsy; PVL: periventricular leukomalacia.

Table 2 shows the summary of perinatal findings in the 7 pseudomonoamniotic twin gestations. In 3 cases of these (43%), the disruption of the dividing membrane was associated with the therapies (amniocentesis and fetoscopic laser photocoagulation) for TTTS. As our impression, at the deliveries the area of the perforated portions of dividing membranes seemed to be large enough to lead to umbilical cord entanglement. Of 4 cases with spontaneous membrane rupture, 2 mothers (cases 5 and 7) felt the amniotic fluid flow due to membrane rupture of the second twin before labor. The incidence of perinatal loss per total number of neonates was 21% (3/14). One case (14%) resulted in double death, while 1 (14%) case resulted in single death during the second trimester. The incidence of umbilical cord entanglement was 43% (3/7). There were no cases of cerebral injury or severe congenital heart anomalies.
Table 2

Summary of perinatal findings in 7 pseudomonoamniotic twin gestations.

NumberGA at deliveryTwin ATwin BUC entanglementCause of membrane rupture
127IUFDIUFDNoAmnioreduction due to TTTS
228HealthyIUFD (21 weeks)YesSingle IUFD
331HealthyHealthyNoFLP due to TTTS
433HealthyHealthyNoFLP due to TTTS
535HealthyHealthyNoUnknown
636HealthyHealthyYesUnknown
737HealthyHealthyYesUnknown

GA: gestational age; UC: umbilical cord; IUFD: intrauterine fetal death; TTTS: twin-twin transfusion syndrome; FLP: fetoscopic laser photocoagulation.

There were no significant differences in the incidence of neonatal death or umbilical cord entanglement between the monoamniotic and pseudomonoamniotic twin gestations (P = 0.94 and 0.36). Thirteen of 15 perinatal losses (87%) were occurred before 32 weeks of gestation.

4. Discussion

To date, some possible mechanisms leading to antepartum rupture of the intertwin-dividing membrane except artificial septostomy, such as amniocentesis and fetoscopic laser photocoagulation, have been proposed, such as infection (chorioamnionitis) [9], developmental disturbance [9], trauma or physical rupture by fetuses [10], and intrauterine sling formation [11]. In addition, some cases of spontaneous antepartum rupture, in which the exact cause of rupture of membrane cannot be well determined, have been reported. In our 7 cases of pseudomonoamniotic twin gestations, 3 cases were artificial and 4 cases were spontaneous. We know that the sample size of this study is very small; however, the current results may indicate that the perinatal outcomes of pseudomonoamniotic twin gestations do not differ from those of true monoamniotic twin gestations. Based on the results, the incidence of umbilical cord entanglement, which is the most critical concern in twin gestations, in monoamniotic twins seemed to be similar to that in pseudomonoamniotic twins. As our impression, the area of the perforated portions of dividing membranes seemed to be large enough to lead to umbilical cord entanglement. In addition, there was no significant difference in perinatal loss between the monoamniotic and pseudomonoamniotic twins. Therefore, the same serious management may be needed for pseudomonoamniotic twin gestations as for monoamniotic twin gestations. In this study, the total incidence of perinatal death in monoamniotic and pseudomonoamniotic twin gestations seemed to be high as previously reported [1, 2]; however, 87% of perinatal losses were occurred before 32 weeks of gestation, and there was no occurrence of new perinatal deaths after 34 weeks of gestation. In some literatures, the recommended timing of delivery range to prevent sudden intrauterine fetal death has been reported to be between 32 and 34 weeks [1, 15, 16]. However, the current result may support the other articles that the incidence of fetal death after 32 weeks is not high in monoamniotic twins [17, 18], which is suggesting that prophylactic preterm delivery may not be indicated in all monoamniotic twin gestations. Therefore, a further large study may be needed concerning the appropriate timing of delivery for monoamniotic and pseudomonoamniotic twins.

5. Conclusion

The same management is needed for monoamniotic and pseudomonoamniotic twin gestations.
  18 in total

1.  Incidence of intrauterine complications in monoamniotic twin gestation.

Authors:  S Suzuki; K Kaneko; S Shin; T Araki
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  Intrauterine sling with umbilical cord entanglement in diamniotic twins.

Authors:  J E De Lia; D Worthington
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 3.  Monoamniotic twins: diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Lin Lin Su
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 4.  Perinatal outcomes in monoamniotic gestations.

Authors:  H Roqué; J Gillen-Goldstein; E Funai; B K Young; C J Lockwood
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2003-06

5.  Monoamniotic twins: a retrospective controlled study.

Authors:  J A Tessen; F J Zlatnik
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Survival rates of monoamniotic twins do not decrease after 30 weeks' gestation.

Authors:  S R Carr; M P Aronson; D R Coustan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Monoamniotic and pseudomonoamniotic twins: sonographic diagnosis, detection of cord entanglement, and obstetric management.

Authors:  G A Aisenbrey; V A Catanzarite; T J Hurley; J H Spiegel; D B Schrimmer; A Mendoza
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Antepartum rupture of diamniotic membranes separating monozygotic twins. A case report.

Authors:  S E Chen; L Trupin; S Trupin
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 0.142

9.  Morbidity associated with prenatal disruption of the dividing membrane in twin gestations.

Authors:  W M Gilbert; S E Davis; C Kaplan; D Pretorius; T A Merritt; K Benirschke
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Monoamniotic twins: case series and proposal for antenatal management.

Authors:  E Beasley; G Megerian; A Gerson; N S Roberts
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  2 in total

1.  Perinatal mortality and morbidity, timing and route of delivery in monoamniotic twin pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yvon Chitrit; Diane Korb; Cecile Morin; Thomas Schmitz; Jean-François Oury; Olivier Sibony
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  Complex Twisted Knots of Umbilical Cord in a Monochorionic-Diamniotic Twin Gestation: A Case Report.

Authors:  Behnaz Razavi; Maryam Kasraeian; Atefe Hashemi; Shaghayegh Moradi Alamdarloo; Fateme Sadat Najib
Journal:  Galen Med J       Date:  2020-09-16
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.