Literature DB >> 23509061

Duration of ventilations during cardiopulmonary resuscitation by lay rescuers and first responders: relationship between delivering chest compressions and outcomes.

Stefanie G Beesems1, Lizzy Wijmans, Jan G P Tijssen, Rudolph W Koster.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The 2010 guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation allow 5 seconds to give 2 breaths to deliver sufficient chest compressions and to keep perfusion pressure high. This study aims to determine whether the recommended short interruption for ventilations by trained lay rescuers and first responders can be achieved and to evaluate its consequence for chest compressions and survival. METHODS AND
RESULTS: From a prospective data collection of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, we used automatic external defibrillator recordings of cardiopulmonary resuscitation by rescuers who had received a standard European Resuscitation Council basic life support and automatic external defibrillator course. Ventilation periods and total compressions delivered per minute during each 2 minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation cycle were measured, and the chest compression fraction was calculated. Neurological intact survival to discharge was studied in relation to these factors and covariates. We included 199 automatic external defibrillator recordings. The median interruption time for 2 ventilations was 7 seconds (25th-75th percentile, 6-9 seconds). Of all rescuers, 21% took <5 seconds and 83% took <10 seconds for a ventilation period; 97%, 88%, and 63% of rescuers were able to deliver >60, >70, and >80 chest compressions per minute, respectively. The median chest compression fraction was 65% (25th-75th percentile, 59%-71%). Survival was 25% (49 of 199), not associated with long or short ventilation pauses when controlled for covariates.
CONCLUSIONS: The great majority of rescuers can give 2 rescue breaths in <10 seconds and deliver at least 70 compressions in a minute. Longer pauses for ventilations are not associated with worse outcome. Guidelines may allow longer pauses for ventilations with no detriment to survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23509061     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  6 in total

1.  Letter to the Editor: Chest Compression Rate, Rescuer's Fatigue and Patient's Survival.

Authors:  Je Hyeok Oh
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.153

2.  Effects of Bag Mask Ventilation and Advanced Airway Management on Adherence to Ventilation Recommendations and Chest Compression Fraction: A Prospective Randomized Simulator-Based Trial.

Authors:  Lea Vogt; Timur Sellmann; Dietmar Wetzchewald; Heidrun Schwager; Sebastian Russo; Stephan Marsch
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  Implementation and Evaluation of Resuscitation Training for Childcare Workers.

Authors:  Jörg Michel; Tim Ilg; Felix Neunhoeffer; Michael Hofbeck; Ellen Heimberg
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.418

Review 4.  Rhythm analysis during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Sofia Ruiz de Gauna; Unai Irusta; Jesus Ruiz; Unai Ayala; Elisabete Aramendi; Trygve Eftestøl
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Part 2. Adult basic life support: 2015 Korean Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.

Authors:  Keun Jeong Song; Jae-Bum Kim; Jinhee Kim; Chanwoong Kim; Sun Young Park; Chang Hee Lee; Yong Soo Jang; Gyu Chong Cho; Youngsuk Cho; Sung Phil Chung; Sung Oh Hwang
Journal:  Clin Exp Emerg Med       Date:  2016-07-05

6.  Mild Hypothermia Protects Pigs' Gastric Mucosa After Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation via Inhibiting Interleukin 6 (IL-6) Production.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Jian Song; Yuhong Liu; Yaqiang Li; Zhengxin Liu
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-10-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.