OBJECTIVE: Pediatric studies for new biological agents are mandated by recent legislation, necessitating careful thought to evaluation of emerging multiple sclerosis (MS) therapies in children with MS. Challenges include a small patient population, the lack of prior randomized clinical trials, and ethical concerns. The goal of this meeting was to assess areas of consensus regarding clinical trial design and outcome measures among academic experts involved in pediatric MS care and research. METHODS: The Steering Committee of the International Pediatric MS Study Group identified key focus areas for discussion. A total of 69 meeting attendees were assembled, including 35 academic experts. Regulatory and pharmaceutical representatives also attended, and provided input, which informed academic expert consensus decisions. RESULTS: The academic experts agreed that clinical trials were necessary in pediatric MS to obtain pharmacokinetic, safety and efficacy data, and regulatory approval allowing for greater medication access. The academic experts agreed that relapse was an appropriate primary outcome measure for phase III pediatric trials. An international standardized cognitive battery was identified. The pros and cons of various trial designs were discussed. Guidelines surrounding MRI studies, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and registries were developed. The academic experts agreed that given the limited subject pool, a stepwise approach to the launch of clinical trials for the most promising medications is necessary in order to ensure study completion. Alternative approaches could result in unethical exposure of patients to trial conditions without gaining knowledge. CONCLUSION: Consensus points for conduct of clinical trials in the rare disease pediatric MS were identified amongst a panel of academic experts, informed by regulatory and industry stakeholders.
OBJECTIVE: Pediatric studies for new biological agents are mandated by recent legislation, necessitating careful thought to evaluation of emerging multiple sclerosis (MS) therapies in children with MS. Challenges include a small patient population, the lack of prior randomized clinical trials, and ethical concerns. The goal of this meeting was to assess areas of consensus regarding clinical trial design and outcome measures among academic experts involved in pediatric MS care and research. METHODS: The Steering Committee of the International Pediatric MS Study Group identified key focus areas for discussion. A total of 69 meeting attendees were assembled, including 35 academic experts. Regulatory and pharmaceutical representatives also attended, and provided input, which informed academic expert consensus decisions. RESULTS: The academic experts agreed that clinical trials were necessary in pediatric MS to obtain pharmacokinetic, safety and efficacy data, and regulatory approval allowing for greater medication access. The academic experts agreed that relapse was an appropriate primary outcome measure for phase III pediatric trials. An international standardized cognitive battery was identified. The pros and cons of various trial designs were discussed. Guidelines surrounding MRI studies, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and registries were developed. The academic experts agreed that given the limited subject pool, a stepwise approach to the launch of clinical trials for the most promising medications is necessary in order to ensure study completion. Alternative approaches could result in unethical exposure of patients to trial conditions without gaining knowledge. CONCLUSION: Consensus points for conduct of clinical trials in the rare disease pediatric MS were identified amongst a panel of academic experts, informed by regulatory and industry stakeholders.
Authors: C Till; R Ghassemi; B Aubert-Broche; A Kerbrat; D L Collins; S Narayanan; D L Arnold; M Desrocher; J G Sled; B L Banwell Journal: Neuropsychology Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: W S MacAllister; A L Belman; M Milazzo; D M Weisbrot; C Christodoulou; W F Scherl; T E Preston; C Cianciulli; L B Krupp Journal: Neurology Date: 2005-04-26 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Amy T Waldman; Girish Hiremath; Robert A Avery; Amy Conger; Stacy L Pineles; Michael J Loguidice; Lauren S Talman; Kristin M Galetta; Michael J Shumski; James Wilson; E'tona Ford; Amy M Lavery; Darrel Conger; Benjamin M Greenberg; Jonas H Ellenberg; Elliot M Frohman; Laura J Balcer; Peter A Calabresi Journal: Mult Scler Relat Disord Date: 2013-05-01 Impact factor: 4.339
Authors: Jonathan D Santoro; Michael Waltz; Greg Aaen; Anita Belman; Leslie Benson; Mark Gorman; Manu S Goyal; Jennifer S Graves; Yolanda Harris; Lauren Krupp; Timothy Lotze; Soe Mar; Manikum Moodley; Jayne Ness; Mary Rensel; Moses Rodriguez; Teri Schreiner; Jan-Mendelt Tillema; Emmanuelle Waubant; Bianca Weinstock-Guttman; Brigitte F Hurtubise; Shelly Roalstad; John Rose; T Charles Casper; Tanuja Chitnis Journal: Neurology Date: 2020-07-20 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: April V P Clyburne-Sherin; Pravheen Thurairajah; Mufiza Z Kapadia; Margaret Sampson; Winnie W Y Chan; Martin Offringa Journal: Trials Date: 2015-09-18 Impact factor: 2.279