Literature DB >> 23508534

Environmental assessment on a soil washing process of a Pb-contaminated shooting range site: a case study.

Do-Hyung Kim1, Bo-Ram Hwang, Deok-Hyun Moon, Yong-Seok Kim, Kitae Baek.   

Abstract

In this study, an environmental assessment on a soil washing process for the remediation of a Pb-contaminated shooting range site was conducted, using a green and sustainable remediation tool, i.e., SiteWise ver. 2, based on data relating specifically to the actual remediation project. The entire soil washing process was classified into four major stages, consisting of soil excavation (stage I), physical separation (stage II), acid-based (0.2 N HCl) chemical extraction (stage III), and wastewater treatment (stage IV). Environmental footprints, including greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, energy consumption, water consumption, and critical air pollutant productions such as PM10, NO x , and SO x , were calculated, and the relative contribution of each stage was analyzed in the environmental assessment. In stage I, the relative contribution of the PM10 emissions was 55.3 % because the soil excavation emitted the fine particles. In stage II, the relative contribution of NO x and SO x emissions was 42.5 and 52.5 %, respectively, which resulted from electricity consumption for the operation of the separator. Stage III was the main contributing factor to 63.1 % of the GHG emissions, 67.5 % of total energy used, and 37.4 % of water consumptions. The relatively high contribution of stage III comes from use of consumable chemicals such as HCl and water-based extraction processes. In stage IV, the relative contributions of GHG emissions, total energy used, and NO x and SO x emissions were 23.2, 19.4, 19.5, and 25.3 %, respectively, which were caused by chemical and electricity demands for system operation. In conclusion, consumable chemicals such as HCl and NaOH, electric energy consumption for system operation, and equipment use for soil excavation were determined to be the major sources of environmental pollution to occur during the soil washing process. Especially, the acid-based chemical extraction process should be avoided in order to improve the sustainability of soil washing processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23508534     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-013-1599-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  5 in total

1.  Life cycle assessment of active and passive groundwater remediation technologies.

Authors:  Peter Bayer; Michael Finkel
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2005-12-27       Impact factor: 3.188

2.  A comparison of the technical sustainability of in situ stabilisation/solidification with disposal to landfill.

Authors:  M J Harbottle; A Al-Tabbaa; C W Evans
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2006-06-03       Impact factor: 10.588

3.  Life-cycle case study comparison of permeable reactive barrier versus pump-and-treat remediation.

Authors:  Monica R Higgins; Terese M Olson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 4.  A perspective on LCA application in site remediation services: critical review of challenges.

Authors:  Sérgio Alberto Morais; Cristina Delerue-Matos
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 10.588

5.  Environmental life-cycle comparisons of two polychlorinated biphenyl remediation technologies: incineration and base catalyzed decomposition.

Authors:  Xintao Hu; Jianxin Zhu; Qiong Ding
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 10.588

  5 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  A market modeling review study on predicting Malaysian consumer behavior towards widespread adoption of PHEV/EV.

Authors:  Nadia Adnan; Shahrina Mohammad Nordin; Imran Rahman; Mohammad Hadi Amini
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Environmental assessment on electrokinetic remediation of multimetal-contaminated site: a case study.

Authors:  Do-Hyung Kim; Jong-Chan Yoo; Bo-Ram Hwang; Jung-Seok Yang; Kitae Baek
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Removal of Pb and Zn from contaminated soil by different washing methods: the influence of reagents and ultrasound.

Authors:  Jiaming Wang; Jianguo Jiang; Dean Li; Tianran Li; Kaimin Li; Sicong Tian
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 4.223

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.