| Literature DB >> 23508352 |
Eliete B Canterle1, David da Motta Marques, Lúcia R Rodrigues.
Abstract
Temporary wetlands are short-term alternative ecosystems formed by flooding for irrigation of areas used for rice farming. The goal of this study is to describe the development cycle of rice fields as temporary wetlands in southern Brazil, evaluating how this process affect the gas production (CH4 and CO2) in soil with difference % carbon and organic matter content. Two areas adjacent to Lake Mangueira in southern Brazil were used during a rice-farming cycle. One area had soil containing 1.1% carbon and 2.4% organic matter, and the second area had soil with 2.4% carbon and 4.4% organic matter. The mean rates of gas production were 0.04 ± 0.02 mg CH4 m(-2) d(-1) and 1.18 ± 0.30 mg CO2 m(-2) d(-1) in the soil area with the lower carbon content, and 0.02 ± 0.03 mg CH4 m(-2) d(-1) and 1.38 ± 0.41 mg CO2 m(-2) d(-1) in the soil area with higher carbon content. Our results showed that mean rates of CO2 production were higher than those of CH4 in both areas. No statistically significant difference was observed for production of CH4 considering different periods and sites. For carbon dioxide (CO2), however, a Two-Way ANOVA showed statistically significant difference (p = 0.05) considering sampling time, but no difference between areas. The results obtained suggest that the carbon and organic matter contents in the soil of irrigated rice cultivation areas may have been used in different ways by soil microorganisms, leading to variations in CH4 and CO2 production.Entities:
Keywords: % carbon; % organic matter; CH4; CO2; ecosystem development
Year: 2013 PMID: 23508352 PMCID: PMC3597979 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00056
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1Mangueira Lake, a large coastal lake in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Southern Brazil, and localization of rice fields sampled (•).
Results of chemical analyses of soil from the sampling sites.
| Organic matter (%) | 2.4 ± 0.2 | 4.4 ± 0.2 |
| Carbon (%) | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 2.4 ± 0.6 |
| Clay (%) | 12.3 ± 4.0 | 15.7 ± 3.1 |
| K (%) | 148.7 ± 60.4 | 150.5 ± 29.1 |
| P (%) | 25.3 ± 10.8 | 10.6 ± 2.1 |
| Ca/Mg | 3.1 ± 0.2 | 4.7 ± 2.0 |
| Ca/K | 6.6 ± 1.6 | 31 ± 13.2 |
| Mg/K | 2.1 ± 0.4 | 6.7 ± 1.5 |
| S (%) | 9.5 ± 2.7 | 9.8 ± 2.9 |
| Zn (%) | 2.3 ± 1.2 | 2.3 ± 0.5 |
| Cu (%) | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 0.7 ± 0.0 |
| B (%) | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.1 |
| Mn (%) | 50.7 ± 22.0 | 6.3 ± 0.6 |
| pH | 5.6 ± 0.2 | 6.2 ± 0.1 |
Results of analyses of water from the water/sediment interface samples.
| DIC (mg · L−1) | 19.66 ± 4.4 | 24.79 ± 4.5 | 21.82 ± 2.3 | 28.32 ± 3.5 | 25.47 ± 2.5 | 26.38 ± 1.1 | 27.74 ± 2.8 | 29.19 ± 3.2 |
| DOC (mg · L−1) | 15.11 ± 8.6 | 18.33 ± 10.6 | 12.52 ± 5.9 | 10.16 ± 2.7 | 7.12 ± 1.7 | 6.33 ± 0.8 | 8.30 ± 1.7 | 7.42 ± 1.9 |
| Total Solids (mg · L−1) | 310 ± 102 | 274 ± 96 | 238 ± 20 | 247 ± 12 | 221 ± 10 | 211 ± 11 | 201 ± 61 | 201 ± 17 |
| SRSi (mg · L−1) | 3.22 ± 0.77 | 3.47 ± 0.68 | 1.03 ± 0.90 | 1.56 ± 1.04 | 1.76 ± 0.84 | 2.14 ± 0.48 | 0.36 ± 0.33 | 0.27 ± 0.09 |
| DOM—UVDOC (254 nm) | 0.44 ± 0.26 | 0.30 ± 0.13 | 0.03 ± 0.03 | 0.05 ± 0.03 | 0.14 ± 0.03 | 0.18 ± 0.03 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.01 ± 0.01 |
| Chlorophyll | 29.33 ± 21.85 | 33.19 ± 22.80 | 39.47 ± 17.28 | 42.73 ± 21.35 | 2.51 ± 1.38 | 2.52 ± 0.64 | 2.25 ± 1.20 | 1.64 ± 0.66 |
| TP (μg · L−1) | 5.9 ± 4.5 | 3.2 ± 1.9 | 2.3 ± 1.5 | 2.8 ± 1.7 | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 1.5 ± 0.2 | 0.1 ± 0.0 | 0.1 ± 0.0 |
| SRP (μg · L−1) | 2.82 ± 2.31 | 1.21 ± 0.88 | 0.30 ± 0.38 | 2.25 ± 2.40 | 0.14 ± 0.03 | 0.18 ± 0.03 | 0.03 ± 0.02 | 0.02 ± 0.01 |
| TN (μg · L−1) | 100 ± 20 | 170 ± 70 | 40 ± 20 | 40 ± 10 | 30 ± 20 | 20 ± 10 | 20 ± 10 | 10 ± 5 |
| NO3-N (μg · L−1) | 50 ± 40 | 50 ± 20 | 20 ± 10 | 30 ± 20 | 10 ± 5 | 10 ± 5 | NQ | NQ |
| Dissolved oxygen (mg · L−1) | 7.6 | 5.9 | 10.6 | 6.8 | 9.9 | 7.7 | 5.9 | 5.5 |
| Water temperature (°C) | 22.1 | 21.2 | 27.2 | 26 | 23.8 | 22.8 | 26.3 | 28.4 |
| pH | 7.8 ± 0.2 | 7.4 ± 0.4 | 7.3 ± 0.3 | 7.2 ± 0.1 | 6.7 ± 0.4 | 6.9 ± 0.2 | 7.6 ± 0.4 | 7.3 ± 0.4 |
DOM, dissolved organic matter; DIC, dissolved inorganic carbon; DOC, dissolved organic carbon; SRSi, soluble reactive silicate; TP, total phosphorus; SRP, soluble reactive phosphorus; TN, total nitrogen; NO3, nitrate.
Figure 2Methane productions in the Area 1 and in the Area 2 throughout the rice crop cycle (.
Figure 3Carbon dioxide productions in the Area 1 and in the Area 2 throughout the rice crop cycle (.
Figure 4Bacterioplankton abundance rates obtained from the water/sediment interface in both areas during rice cultivation.
Rates of CH.
| Rice field 1/Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil | 0.04 ± 0.02 | 1.18 ± 0.3 | Measured by accumulation of gas in the head space | This study |
| Rice field 2/Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil | 0.02 ± 0.03 | 1.38 ± 0.41 | ||
| Rice field (bare soil)/Punjab, India | 1.68 to 49.44 | – | Measured by closed chamber technique | Khosa et al., |
| Rice field (transplanting of rice crop)/Punjab, India | 0.96 to 22.32 | – | ||
| Rice field 1/Gujarat, India | 2536 to 17295 | – | Measured by static chamber technique | Kumar and Viyol, |
| Rice field 2/Gujarat, India | 4838 to 10342 | – | ||
| Swamp/USA | 83 to 155 | – | Measured by chamber technique | Wilson et al., |
| Marsh/USA | 146 to 912 | – | Measured by chamber technique | Alford et al., |
| Permanently inundated wetland/USA | 153.71 | – | Measured by gas sampling chambers technique | Altor and Mitsch, |
| Freshwater wetlands/USA | Mitsch and Gosselink, | |||
| (a) Rice paddies | 90.83 | – | – | |
| (b) Michigan swamp | 146.93 | – | – | |
| (c) Dismal swamp/virgínia | 1.33 to 20.03 | – | – | |
| (d) Louisiana tidal freshwater marsh | 587.75 | – | – | |
| Lake dagow/Germany | 1.40 | – | Measured by accumulation of gas in the head space | Casper, |
| Lake fuchskuhle/Germany | 0.47 | – | ||
| Lake stechlin/Germany | 0.32 | – | ||