Literature DB >> 23508289

Evaluation of the Combined Effect of 2ME2 and (60)Co on the Inducement of DNA Damage by IUdR in a Spheroid Model of the U87MG Glioblastoma Cancer Cell Line Using Alkaline Comet Assay.

Samideh Khoei1, Sara Delfan, Ali Neshasteh-Riz, Seyed Rabi Mahdavi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we investigated the combined effect of 2-Methoxyestradiol (2ME2) and (60)Co on the cytogenetic damage of iododeoxyuridine (IUdR) in the spheroid model of U87MG glioblastoma cancer cell lines by alkaline comet assay.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: U87MG cells were cultured as spheroids with diameters of 350 µm. As control, the spheroids of one plate were not treated. Other cultures were pretreated with 2ME2 (250 µM) for one volume doubling time (1 VDT). After this time, the subsequent treatments were performed according to the following groups: Vehicle (this sample was not treated in the 2(nd) VDT) Treated with 2ME2 (250 µM) for 1 VDT Treated simultaneously with 2ME2 (250 µM) and IUdR (1 µM) for 1 VDT Treated with 2ME2 (250 µM) for 1 VDT then irradiated with (60)Co (2 Gy) Treated simultaneously with 2ME2 (250 µM) and IUdR (1 µM) for 1 VDT then irradiated with (60)Co (2 Gy) Then the DNA damage was evaluated using the alkaline comet assay method.
RESULTS: The results showed that 2ME2 in combination with gamma irradiation of (60)Co significantly (p<0.001) increased the DNA damage by IUdR as compared to the control group. Thus the combination of these two agents increased the cytogenetic effects of IUdR in the spheroid culture model of U87MG glioblastoma cell lines.
CONCLUSION: By inhibiting the HIF-1α protein and preventing the G0 phase arrest, 2ME2 causes an increased progression into S phase and increases the IUdR absorption. Then the DNA damage in the spheroid cells increases as the uptake of IUdR is increased. These results suggest that the combined use of 2ME2 and (60)Co can increase the radiosensitization effect of IUdR.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2-Methoxyestradiol; Comet; DNA Damage; HIF-1Alpha; Iododeoxyuridinre

Year:  2011        PMID: 23508289      PMCID: PMC3584462     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell J        ISSN: 2228-5806            Impact factor:   2.479


introduction

Gliomas are the most common central nervous system tumors and the glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common primary brain tumor in adults as well as one of the most aggressive cancers in man (1). In 2003, 18300 cases of malignant glioma and 13100 deaths due to this disease were reported in the USA. The malignant glioma is often treated via surgery followed by radiation (2-5). Unfortunately, the irradiation effective enough to control the tumors far exceeds the tolerance of normal brain tissues (6). Thus, to avoid such unfavorable outcomes; methods which sensitize the tumor cells to ionizing radiation (IR) are used. Iododeoxyuridine (IUdR) is a known radiosensitizer that selectively affects the cells. IUdR is a halogenated thymidine analogue, which incorporates into DNA instead of thymine during DNA replication and increases the radiosensitization of cells. The process of IUdR radiosensitization is totally unexplained; however it is wellknown that DNA damage caused by single and double strand breaks are increased in the presence of IUdR (7). IUdR is activated in the synthesis phase (7); therefore using IUdR when the tumor size is increased and the cells in the median layers suffer from hypoxia due to oxygen deficiency, means IUdR cannot incorporates into DNA. Hypoxia induces cell cycle arrest in the G0 phase (8). In this condition, the IUdR absorption is significantly reduced (9). An important component of the hypoxic response is the activation of the hypoxia inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) transcription factor. Enhancement of this protein level leads to cell cycle arrest (10). Under normoxic conditions, HIF-1α has a short half lifetime (t1∕2=0.5 minute) and degrades rapidly (11). Under hypoxia conditions, HIF-1α is transferred from cytoplasm to nucleus and by attaching to HIF-1β, forms the HIF-1 complex (12, 13). The activity of HIF-1 complex depends on the interaction between hypoxia response elements (HREs) and HIF-1α (14). This interaction activates more than 60 genes with different functions, leading to an increase in O2 delivery (15). These genes include erythropoietine (EPO), glucose transporters, glycolytic enzymes and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (16). Hypoxia increases the expression of EPO, which is required for the formation of red blood cells. An increase in the number of erythrocytes enhances the delivery of oxygen to tissues (17). Angiogenesis is the result of VEGF synthesis in the hypoxia condition, which itself leads into an increase in vascular density and consequently a reduction of the oxygen diffusion distance (18-20). Research shows that 2-Methoxystradiol (2ME2) inhibits activation of HIF-1α in the hypoxia condition (21). 2ME2 is an estrogen metabolite that inhibits the proliferation, migration and invasion of the endothelial cell (21, 22). Recent studies show that 2ME2 inhibits HIF-1α by depolymerizing the microtubule (23); however this process is still unexplained. The HIF-1α inhibition by 2ME2 is caused by a reduction in the HIF-1α protein levels. The decrease in the HIF-1α levels is accomplished by either reducing the synthesis or increasing the degradation of this protein or both (24). The advantage of 2ME2 over the other drugs that inhibit HIF-1α is that unlike other drugs, 2ME2 is not toxic and does not have the side effects of those drugs. The low toxicity of 2ME2 can be partially due to its fast reversibility (25). The radiosesitization of most of the glioma cells in the monolayer culture is a very weak reflection of tumor behavior (26). Cells in the spheroid model, similar to the real tumors, are generally more radioresistant than the monolayer model. Spheroids are a three-dimensional form of cell, which have been accepted as an in-vitro model of a solid tumor (27). The absorption of IUdR decreases with the increase in the diameter of the spheroid (28). Research shows that the monolayer SQ5 cells do not express the HIF-1 protein. In contrast, the spheroid and xenograft cells show higher expressions of HIF-1. This finding suggests that HIF-1 expression is enhanced during the growth of threedimensional cell structures (29). For more than two decades, the comet assay or single- cell gel electrophoresis (SCGE) has been one of the standard methods for the assessment DNA damage (30). This technique is based on the detection of DNA strand breaks in the single cells (31). Damage is quantified as comet tail moment, which represents the extent of DNA damage in individual cells (32). The comet assay is also a precise and appropriate method for evaluating cell death based on DNA damage in spheroid cultures (33). In the present study, we have investigated the combined effect of 2ME2 and 60Co on the level of induced DNA damage caused by IUdR in the spheroid model of the U87MG glioblastoma cell line. U87MG is an established cell line that can self-assemble into large, stable spheroids through a combination of intracellular communication and diffusion. In this study, we used spheroids with 350 µm diameters. This guarantees the existence of hypoxic cells.

Materials and Methods

Cell line

Human glioblastoma cell line U87MG was purchased from the Pasteur Institute of Iran. This cell line was cultured in Minimum Essential Medium (MEM) (Gibco) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Biosera), 100 U/ml of penicillin and 100 mg/ml of streptomycin (Biosera).

Monolayer cultureA

Cells were cultured as a monolayer at a density of 104 cells/cm2 in T-25 tissue culture flasks (NUNC). Cultures were maintained at 37℃ in a humidified atmosphere and 5% CO2. Cells were harvested by trypsinizing cultures with 0.25% trypsin and 0.03% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) (Sigma) in phosphate buffer saline (PBS).

Spheroid culture

Spheroids were cultured using the liquid overlay technique. 5 × 105 cells were seeded into 100 mm petridishes (Greiner) coated with a thin layer of 1% agar with 10 ml of MEM supplemented with 10% FBS. The plates were incubated at 37℃ in a humidified atmosphere and 5% CO2. Half of the culture medium was replaced with fresh culture medium every three days.

IGrowth curve

After three passages of monolayer culture, Cells were cultured at a density of 10000 per well in multiwell plates (24 wells/plate) (Greiner). The multiwell was incubated at 37℃ in a humidified atmosphere and 5% CO2. For nine days, at 24-hour intervals, the cells from triplicate wells were removed by 1mM EDTA/0.25% trypsin (w/v) treatment and counted in a hemocytometer. An average of nine counts was used to define each point (Mean ± SEM). Half of the culture medium was replaced with fresh medium twice per week. Then the growth curve was plotted. In the linear area or logarithmic phase of the curve, the cells follow this equation: N=N0 × ebt Here N0 is the initial number of the cells, N is the number of the cells after time t, and b shows the gradient of the logarithmic phase of the curve. Then, the population doubling time of the cells is determined according to the gradient of the logarithmic phase of the curve.

Drug treatment and Gamma radiation

U87MG cells were cultured as spheroids with 350 µm diameters. As control, the spheroids on one plate were not treated. Other cultures were pretreated with 2ME2 (250µM) for one 1 VDT. After this time, the subsequent treatments were performed according to the following groups: Then the DNA damage was evaluated using the alkaline comet assay method. Vehicle (this sample was not treated in the 2nd VDT) Treated with 2ME2 (250 µM) for 1 VDT Treated simultaneously with 2ME2 (250 µM) and IUdR (1 µM) for 1 VDT Treated with 2ME2 (250 µM) for 1 VDT then irradiated with 60Co (2 Gy) (34) Treated simultaneously with 2ME2 (250 µM) and IUdR (1 µM) for 1 VDT then irradiated with 60Co (2 Gy)

Trypan blue exclusion assay

A suspension of treated and control single cells from spheroid cultures were mixed with trypan blue at a ratio of 9:1. After a few minutes the mixture was examined under a light microscope (Leica, DMLS), and the blue cells were considered dead. The percentage of unstained cells out of the total number of cells was the viability of each cell category.

Comet assay

The induction of DNA damage due to 2ME2 alone or in combination with IUdR and 60Co was determined by alkaline comet assay in U87MG spheroid cells. The alkaline comet assay in this study was a modification of the method described by Singh et al. (35). Ordinary microscope slides were coated with 1% normal melting point agarose (Merck). The treated and control cells were counted in a hemocytometer (36) and approximately 10,000 cells in 10 µl PBS were suspended in 100 µL of 0.5% low melting point agarose (Merck). The cell suspension was rapidly pipetted onto the first agarose layer. The slides were allowed to solidify, then immersed in freshly prepared lysis buffer (2.5 M NaCl, 100 mM EDTA, 10 mM Tris-base with 1% Triton X-100, pH=10) and incubated for an hour. From that point on, all the steps were performed at 4℃. The slides were removed from the lysis buffer and placed in a horizontal gel electrophoresis tank (Cleaver Scientific Ltd, CSL-COM20) which was filled with fresh cold denaturation buffer (300 mM NaOH, 1mM EDTA, pH=13). The slides were left in the solution for 30 minutes. Electrophoresis was conducted in the same denaturation buffer for 30 minutes using 1V/cm voltage and a current of 300 mA. Following electrophoresis, the slides were washed in Tris buffer (0.4 M Tris-HCl, pH=7.5) to neutralize the excess alkali. Finally, the slides were stained with ethidium bromide (20 µg/mL). The individual cells or comets were viewed and photographed using a fluorescent microscope (Zeiss, Axioskop 2 plus) equipped with an ethidium bromide filter (excitation filter, 535 nm; emission filter, 610 nm) and a CCD camera (Hitachi, KP-D20BP). The photographs were analyzed using Comet Score® software. Figure 1 shows the capture of an image from the microscope camera using Comet Score software. Capture of an image from the microscope camera using Comet Score software

Evaluation of DNA damage

A total of 100 individual cells on each slide and three slides for each sample were scored visually as belonging to one of five predefined classes according to tail length, and given a value of 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 (from no tailing, 0, to maximally tailing, 4). The total score for comets could range from 0 (all no tailing) to 400 (all maximally tailing). DD (au) = (0n0 + 1n1+ 2n2+ 3n3 + 4n4) ∕ (Σn ∕100) Where DD (au) is the arbitrary unit DNA damage score, n0-n4 is the number of class 0-4 comets, and Σn is the total number of scored comets. Coefficients 0-4 are weighting factors for each class of comet (37, 38). One may suspect that the visual classification may be inferior to computerized analyses, such as tail moment analysis of images captured by CCD camera. DNA damage was quantified as an increase in tail moment, the product of the amount of DNA (fluorescence) in the tail, and the distance between the means of the head and tail fluorescence distributions.

Statistical analysis

Data were given as mean ± SEM, with 'n' denoting the number of experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's test as the posthoc analysis using SPSS version 12. The value of p<0.05 was considered to be significant.

Results

Cell characteristics

Monolayer culture

The U87MG glioblastoma cell line grows as a monolayer on tissue culture flasks. Figure 2 shows the phase contrast micrographs of the monolayer culture of the U87MG cell line. The growth curve of these cells in the monolayer culture is shown in figure 3. The population doubling time calculated from this curve was approximately 29.94 hours. Phase contrast micrograph of U87MG cells in the monolayer culture with ×10 magnification

Spheroid culture

The U87MG cells could form spheroids in liquid overlay cultures. Figure 4 shows the phase contrast micrograph of these spheroids with 350 µm diameters 24 days after culture initiation. At this time, spheroids had formed completely into well-rounded structures composed of numerous highly compact cells in which it was difficult to distinguish individual cells from each other (39). In general, the formation time of spheroids depends on the initial number of cells plated. For instance, when 5x105 cells were plated in the 100 mm petridishes on a thin layer of agar, the spheroids were formed within two to three days. The volume doubling time of these spheroids is approximately 67 hours (34), which was applied as the drug treatment time. The comet assay was used for the evaluation of DNA damage after the drug treatment and radiation. Growth curve of U87MG cell line in the monolayer cultures. An average of nine counts was used to define each point. Mean ± SEM of three experiments. Phase contrast micrograph of U87MG cell spheroid with 350 µm diameter on day 24 after culture initiation. Magnification is ×10

DNA damage

Alkaline comet assays were used for the evaluation of DNA damage. Figure 5 shows the intercellular distribution of DNA migration (number of cells in the five visual comet classes) among control and treated cells. We observed a significant increase in the number of comets scored in the visual class with the combination treatment of 2ME2 + IUdR + irradiation of 60Co. Exposure to 2ME2 + IUdR + irradiation of 60Co revealed that the majority of comets were progressively distributed to the next visual category of higher DNA damage. Figure 6 shows the images of single cell gel electrophoresis (comet assay) of U87MG cells of 350 µm spheroids after pretreatment for 67 hours (one volume doubling time) with 250 µM 2ME2 and treatment for the next volume doubling time with 2ME2, IUdR and 60C gamma radiation. Distribution of DNA migrations (stages 0 to 4) among U87MG cells of 350 µm spheroids after pretreatment for 67 hours (one volume doubling time) with 250 µM 2ME2 and treatment for the next volume doubling time with 2ME2, IUdR and 60Co gamma radiation. Data based on the analysis of 100 cells per slide, triplicate slides per samples. The average tail moments in each category of cells was used as an indication of DNA damage. Table 1A, B and figure 7A, B show quantitative measurements of DNA damage by the comet score program. They show respectively the induced DNA damage (DD0) and the net induced DNA damage (DD-DD0). As can be seen in both figures and tables, 2ME2 can significantly increase the DNA damage (p<0.001). The extent of damage in the 2ME2 group is significantly more than in the vehicle group (p<0.001). In other words, with the increase of incubation time from 1 VDT to 2 VDT in pretreated 2ME2 spheroids, DNA damage increases in the cells. Moreover, simultaneous treatment of cells with 2ME2 and IUdR can significantly increase the tail moment as compared to 2ME2 (p<0.001), as shown in the comparison of 2ME2 + 60Co with the 2ME2 group. Furthermore, the DNA damage significantly increased in the presence of 2ME2 + IUdR + irradiation of 60Co as compared to the two groups of 2ME2 + IUdR and 2ME2 + 60Co (p<0.001). Table 2 shows the increasing DNA damage percentage in 350 µm spheroids in the three groups of 2ME2/IUdR, 2ME2/60Co and 2ME2/IUdR/60Co in comparison with the group of 2ME2. As can be seen, the effect of combined treatment with 2ME2/ IUdR/60Co is greater than the sum of the effects of the two groups of IUdR/2ME2 and 60Co/2ME2. Images of single cell gel electrophoresis (comet assay) of U87MG cells of 350 µm spheroids after pretreatment for 67 hours (one volume doubling time) with 250 µM 2ME2 and treatment for the next volume doubling time with 2ME2, IUdR and 60Co gamma radiation. Samples as follows: A. control, samples B to F were pretreated with 250µM 2ME2 and then treated as follows: B. vehicle, C. 2ME2, D. 2ME2 + IUdR, E. 2ME2 + The effects of drugs and radiation on A) induced DNA strand breaks (DD and B) net induced DNA strand breaks (DD - DD of U87MG cells from spheroid cultures. Single cells were analyzed for DNA single strand breaks. Tail moment, an indication of DNA strand breakage, was measured using the alkaline comet assay. Means ± SEM of three experiments.

Discussion

IUdR is a halogenated thymidine analogue which incorporates into DNA instead of thymidine during DNA replication and increases the radiosensitization of the cells (7). When the tumor size is increased, the cells in the median layers suffer from hypoxia due to oxygen deficiency, and the cells respond to hypoxia through the G0 arrest (8). In this condition, IUdR absorption is significantly reduced (9). HIF-1α is the key regulatory element of the hypoxic response of cells. Enhancement of this protein level causes an increased progression into the G0 phase (10). The best-known molecular process, which is necessary for the G1/S phase transition, is retinoblastoma (RB) phosphorylation. Studies show that the arrest in the cell cycle by hypoxia in the G1 phase depends on the decrease in CDK activity. The CDK activity can be inhibited by cycline dependent kinase inhibitors (CDKIs) such as p21 and p27. These inhibitors cause RB hypophosphorylation and consequently promote a G1 arrest (40-42). 2-Methoxystradiol can inhibit HIF-1α expression and prevent this protein’s activity in hypoxia (21). 2ME2 is an estrogen metabolite that inhibits the proliferation, migration and endothelial cell invasion (21, 22). Although 2ME2 is an estrogen metabolite, it has low affinity to estrogen receptors and its antiproliferation activity is independent of the estrogen receptor interaction (43). Recent studies have shown that 2ME2 inhibits HIF-1α by depolymerizing microtubules (23). 2ME2 binds to the colchicine-binding site of tubulin (a site that is at the α/β tubulin interface near α tubulin) and disrupts lateral contacts between protofilaments, which leads to microtubule depolymerization (44). It has been suggested that some physiological differences may exist between cell growth in two-dimensional cultures (monolayer cultures) and multicellular tumor spheroids (44-46). A research conducted on the growth of human glioma cells in these two systems showed different degrees of sensitivity to radioionated IUdR (47). Several authors have reported a higher radioresistance of cells in spheroids compared with monolayer cultures. The radioresistance of spheroid cultures is attributed to the hypoxic cells in the median layer of the spheroid (48-51). In the present study, we have examined IUdR radiosensitization combined with 2ME2 in spheroid cultures of human glioblastoma cell line U87MG. This experiment was performed with 350µm diameter spheroids. This guarantees the existence of the hypoxic and G0 cells. Our previous studies showed that IUdR significantly increases cell damage compared to the control group and as a radiosensitizer it can increase radiationinduced DNA strand breaks (34). Our results reveal that 2ME2 pretreatment significantly increases the cell damage compared to the control group. The ability of 2ME2 to induce damage and prevent tumor growth correlates with its antitumor effects. The antitumor effects of 2ME2 on cancer cells involve the activation of apoptotic cascades. 2ME2 is able to initiate apoptosis by different pathways such as the activation of cell surface death receptors and the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway (21). The present study revealed that 2ME2 inhibits proliferation and promotes apoptosis of glioma cells. Moreover, increasing the incubation time from 1 VDT to 2 VDT in pretreated 2ME2 cells leads to the enhancement of cell damage. Due to an increase in the spheroid size, the hypoxic cells in the median layers of the spheroid, as well as the HIF- 1α protein expression, increase. Our hypothesis is that 2ME2 treatment in the second VDT prevents the new HIF-1α protein expression and suppresses the activity of previous HIF-1α proteins, consequently enhancing the DNA damage. In addition, the cell treatment with 2ME2 and IUdR simultaneously increases the cell damage before and after radiation. These results show that using 2ME2 in glioma cells can increase the cell damage induced by the IUdR radiosensitizer significantly. The reason for this is 2ME2 inhibiting the HIF-1α protein. By suppressing the activity and expression of HIF-1α, 2ME2 causes an increased progression into S phase and increases the IUdR absorption. Then the enhanced absorption of IUdR leads to increased damage of DNA. The inhibition of HIF-1α by 2ME2 is due to the decrease in HIF-1α protein levels, which is a result of either the protein synthesis reduction or the increase in protein degradation, or both. Furthermore, the DNA damage is greater in the presence of 2ME2 when the cells are irradiated by 60Co, compared to treatment with IUdR. This could be due to an increase in the extent of damage in irradiated cells. The types of damage include exchanging in organic bases and sugar components of DNA, as well as the inducement of DNA single and double strand breaks (52).

Conclusion

Combined treatment with 2ME2 and 60Co significantly increased the damage caused by IUdR. Our findings support the pretreatment of cells with 2ME2/IUdR before irradiation with 60Co to enhance tumor radiosensitization and possibly improve the therapeutic index for radiation. Our purpose for further studies is to make use of a carrier such as nanoparticles to increase delivery of IUdR into cells and its uptake into the DNA, and then evaluate the combined effects of these agents on the cells.
A

GroupTail moment ± SE
Pretreatment (1st VDT)Treatment (2nd VDT)
2ME2Control0.518 ± 0.047
Vhicle1.768 ± 0.057
2ME22.366 ± 0.065
2ME2+IUdR3.296 ± 0.072
2ME2+Co4.418 ± 0.124
2ME2+IUdR+Co5.907 ± 0.162

B

GroupTail moment ± SE
Pretreatment (1st VDT)Treatment (2nd VDT)
2ME2Control0 ± 0
Vhicle1.249 ± 0.018
2ME21.848 ± 0.016
2ME2+IUdR2.778 ± 0.025
2ME2+Co3.899 ± 0.107
2ME2+IUdR+Co5.389 ± 0.151

Table 2

Increases in DNA damage percentages in U87MG spheroids in three groups of 2ME2/IUdR, 2ME2/ and 2ME2/IUdR/ in comparison with the group of 2ME2


Increase in DNA damage percentage in group of 2ME2/ IUdR in comparison with 2ME2Increase in DNA damage percentage in group of 2ME2/60Co in comparison with 2ME2Increase in DNA damage percentage in group of 2ME2/ IUdR/60Co in comparison with 2ME2
37.5%83%145%

  49 in total

1.  A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells.

Authors:  N P Singh; M T McCoy; R R Tice; E L Schneider
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 3.905

2.  Heterogeneity in radiation-induced DNA damage and repair in tumor and normal cells measured using the "comet" assay.

Authors:  P L Olive; J P Banáth; R E Durand
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Increased thermoresistance developed during growth of small multicellular spheroids.

Authors:  J C Wigle; R M Sutherland
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 6.384

4.  In situ oxygen consumption rates of cells in V-79 multicellular spheroids during growth.

Authors:  J P Freyer; E Tustanoff; A J Franko; R M Sutherland
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 6.384

Review 5.  Therapeutic irradiation and brain injury.

Authors:  G E Sheline; W M Wara; V Smith
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Hypoxia-inducible nuclear factors bind to an enhancer element located 3' to the human erythropoietin gene.

Authors:  G L Semenza; M K Nejfelt; S M Chi; S E Antonarakis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-07-01       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Evaluation of BCNU and/or radiotherapy in the treatment of anaplastic gliomas. A cooperative clinical trial.

Authors:  M D Walker; E Alexander; W E Hunt; C S MacCarty; M S Mahaley; J Mealey; H A Norrell; G Owens; J Ransohoff; C B Wilson; E A Gehan; T A Strike
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 8.  Survival signalling and apoptosis resistance in glioblastomas: opportunities for targeted therapeutics.

Authors:  Camilla Krakstad; Martha Chekenya
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 27.401

9.  Comparisons of carmustine, procarbazine, and high-dose methylprednisolone as additions to surgery and radiotherapy for the treatment of malignant glioma.

Authors:  S B Green; D P Byar; M D Walker; D A Pistenmaa; E Alexander; U Batzdorf; W H Brooks; W E Hunt; J Mealey; G L Odom; P Paoletti; J Ransohoff; J T Robertson; R G Selker; W R Shapiro; K R Smith; C B Wilson; T A Strike
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1983-02

10.  Cell-cell contact affects cellular sensitivity to hyperthermia.

Authors:  J Dobrucki; N M Bleehen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  6 in total

1.  Neuronal Nitric Oxide Synthase-Mediated Genotoxicity of 2-Methoxyestradiol in Hippocampal HT22 Cell Line.

Authors:  Magdalena Gorska; Michal A Zmijewski; Alicja Kuban-Jankowska; Maciej Wnuk; Iwona Rzeszutek; Michal Wozniak
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 5.590

2.  Effects of resveratrol and methoxyamine on the radiosensitivity of iododeoxyuridine in U87MG glioblastoma cell line.

Authors:  Samideh Khoei; Mohsen Shoja; Ahmad Mostaar; Fariborz Faeghi
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2016-01-08

3.  Genotoxic Damage to Glioblastoma Cells Treated with 6 MV X-Radiation in The Presence or Absence of Methoxy Estradiol, IUDR or Topotecan.

Authors:  Nazila Eyvazzadeh; Ali Neshasteh-Riz; Seyed Rabee Mahdavi; Afshin Mohsenifar
Journal:  Cell J       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 2.479

4.  DNA strand breaks induced by nuclear hijacking of neuronal NOS as an anti-cancer effect of 2-methoxyestradiol.

Authors:  Magdalena Gorska; Alicja Kuban-Jankowska; Michal Zmijewski; Antonella Marino Gammazza; Francesco Cappello; Maciej Wnuk; Monika Gorzynik; Iwona Rzeszutek; Agnieszka Daca; Anna Lewinska; Michal Wozniak
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-06-20

5.  Bovine papillomavirus clastogenic effect analyzed in comet assay.

Authors:  R P Araldi; T C Melo; N Diniz; J Mazzuchelli-de-Souza; R F Carvalho; W Beçak; R C Stocco
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Enhancement of Radio-Thermo-Sensitivity of 5-Iodo-2-Deoxyuridine-Loaded Polymeric-Coated Magnetic Nanoparticles Triggers Apoptosis in U87MG Human Glioblastoma Cancer Cell Line.

Authors:  Samideh Khoei; Vahid Hosseini; Mehdi Hosseini; Sepideh Khoee; Sakine Shirvalilou; Seied Rabi Mahdavi; Jalil Pirayesh Islamian
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 3.337

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.