Samideh Khoei1, Sara Delfan, Ali Neshasteh-Riz, Seyed Rabi Mahdavi. 1. 1. Medical Physics Department, School of Medical Basic Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran ; 2. Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In this study, we investigated the combined effect of 2-Methoxyestradiol (2ME2) and (60)Co on the cytogenetic damage of iododeoxyuridine (IUdR) in the spheroid model of U87MG glioblastoma cancer cell lines by alkaline comet assay. MATERIALS AND METHODS: U87MG cells were cultured as spheroids with diameters of 350 µm. As control, the spheroids of one plate were not treated. Other cultures were pretreated with 2ME2 (250 µM) for one volume doubling time (1 VDT). After this time, the subsequent treatments were performed according to the following groups: Vehicle (this sample was not treated in the 2(nd) VDT) Treated with 2ME2 (250 µM) for 1 VDT Treated simultaneously with 2ME2 (250 µM) and IUdR (1 µM) for 1 VDT Treated with 2ME2 (250 µM) for 1 VDT then irradiated with (60)Co (2 Gy) Treated simultaneously with 2ME2 (250 µM) and IUdR (1 µM) for 1 VDT then irradiated with (60)Co (2 Gy) Then the DNA damage was evaluated using the alkaline comet assay method. RESULTS: The results showed that 2ME2 in combination with gamma irradiation of (60)Co significantly (p<0.001) increased the DNA damage by IUdR as compared to the control group. Thus the combination of these two agents increased the cytogenetic effects of IUdR in the spheroid culture model of U87MG glioblastoma cell lines. CONCLUSION: By inhibiting the HIF-1α protein and preventing the G0 phase arrest, 2ME2 causes an increased progression into S phase and increases the IUdR absorption. Then the DNA damage in the spheroid cells increases as the uptake of IUdR is increased. These results suggest that the combined use of 2ME2 and (60)Co can increase the radiosensitization effect of IUdR.
OBJECTIVE: In this study, we investigated the combined effect of 2-Methoxyestradiol (2ME2) and (60)Co on the cytogenetic damage of iododeoxyuridine (IUdR) in the spheroid model of U87MGglioblastoma cancer cell lines by alkaline comet assay. MATERIALS AND METHODS:U87MG cells were cultured as spheroids with diameters of 350 µm. As control, the spheroids of one plate were not treated. Other cultures were pretreated with 2ME2 (250 µM) for one volume doubling time (1 VDT). After this time, the subsequent treatments were performed according to the following groups: Vehicle (this sample was not treated in the 2(nd) VDT) Treated with 2ME2 (250 µM) for 1 VDT Treated simultaneously with 2ME2 (250 µM) and IUdR (1 µM) for 1 VDT Treated with 2ME2 (250 µM) for 1 VDT then irradiated with (60)Co (2 Gy) Treated simultaneously with 2ME2 (250 µM) and IUdR (1 µM) for 1 VDT then irradiated with (60)Co (2 Gy) Then the DNA damage was evaluated using the alkaline comet assay method. RESULTS: The results showed that 2ME2 in combination with gamma irradiation of (60)Co significantly (p<0.001) increased the DNA damage by IUdR as compared to the control group. Thus the combination of these two agents increased the cytogenetic effects of IUdR in the spheroid culture model of U87MGglioblastoma cell lines. CONCLUSION: By inhibiting the HIF-1α protein and preventing the G0 phase arrest, 2ME2 causes an increased progression into S phase and increases the IUdR absorption. Then the DNA damage in the spheroid cells increases as the uptake of IUdR is increased. These results suggest that the combined use of 2ME2 and (60)Co can increase the radiosensitization effect of IUdR.
Entities:
Keywords:
2-Methoxyestradiol; Comet; DNA Damage; HIF-1Alpha; Iododeoxyuridinre
Gliomas are the most common central nervous system
tumors and the glioblastoma multiforme (GBM)
is the most common primary brain tumor in adults
as well as one of the most aggressive cancers in man
(1). In 2003, 18300 cases of malignant glioma and
13100 deaths due to this disease were reported in the
USA. The malignant glioma is often treated via surgery
followed by radiation (2-5). Unfortunately, the
irradiation effective enough to control the tumors
far exceeds the tolerance of normal brain tissues (6).
Thus, to avoid such unfavorable outcomes; methods
which sensitize the tumor cells to ionizing radiation
(IR) are used. Iododeoxyuridine (IUdR) is a known
radiosensitizer that selectively affects the cells.IUdR is a halogenated thymidine analogue, which
incorporates into DNA instead of thymine during
DNA replication and increases the radiosensitization
of cells. The process of IUdR radiosensitization
is totally unexplained; however it is wellknown
that DNA damage caused by single and
double strand breaks are increased in the presence
of IUdR (7). IUdR is activated in the synthesis
phase (7); therefore using IUdR when the tumor
size is increased and the cells in the median layers
suffer from hypoxia due to oxygen deficiency,
means IUdR cannot incorporates into DNA.Hypoxia induces cell cycle arrest in the G0 phase
(8). In this condition, the IUdR absorption is significantly
reduced (9). An important component of
the hypoxic response is the activation of the hypoxia
inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) transcription factor. Enhancement
of this protein level leads to cell cycle
arrest (10). Under normoxic conditions, HIF-1α has
a short half lifetime (t1∕2=0.5 minute) and degrades
rapidly (11). Under hypoxia conditions, HIF-1α is
transferred from cytoplasm to nucleus and by attaching
to HIF-1β, forms the HIF-1 complex (12, 13).The activity of HIF-1 complex depends on the interaction
between hypoxia response elements (HREs)
and HIF-1α (14). This interaction activates more
than 60 genes with different functions, leading to
an increase in O2 delivery (15). These genes include
erythropoietine (EPO), glucose transporters, glycolytic
enzymes and vascular endothelial growth factor
(VEGF) (16). Hypoxia increases the expression
of EPO, which is required for the formation of red
blood cells. An increase in the number of erythrocytes
enhances the delivery of oxygen to tissues
(17). Angiogenesis is the result of VEGF synthesis
in the hypoxia condition, which itself leads into an
increase in vascular density and consequently a reduction
of the oxygen diffusion distance (18-20).Research shows that 2-Methoxystradiol (2ME2) inhibits
activation of HIF-1α in the hypoxia condition
(21). 2ME2 is an estrogen metabolite that inhibits the
proliferation, migration and invasion of the endothelial
cell (21, 22). Recent studies show that 2ME2
inhibits HIF-1α by depolymerizing the microtubule
(23); however this process is still unexplained. The
HIF-1α inhibition by 2ME2 is caused by a reduction
in the HIF-1α protein levels. The decrease in the
HIF-1α levels is accomplished by either reducing the
synthesis or increasing the degradation of this protein
or both (24). The advantage of 2ME2 over the
other drugs that inhibit HIF-1α is that unlike other
drugs, 2ME2 is not toxic and does not have the side
effects of those drugs. The low toxicity of 2ME2 can
be partially due to its fast reversibility (25).The radiosesitization of most of the glioma cells in
the monolayer culture is a very weak reflection of
tumor behavior (26). Cells in the spheroid model,
similar to the real tumors, are generally more radioresistant
than the monolayer model. Spheroids
are a three-dimensional form of cell, which have
been accepted as an in-vitro model of a solid tumor
(27). The absorption of IUdR decreases with
the increase in the diameter of the spheroid (28).
Research shows that the monolayer SQ5 cells do
not express the HIF-1 protein. In contrast, the
spheroid and xenograft cells show higher expressions
of HIF-1. This finding suggests that HIF-1
expression is enhanced during the growth of threedimensional
cell structures (29).For more than two decades, the comet assay or single-
cell gel electrophoresis (SCGE) has been one
of the standard methods for the assessment DNA
damage (30). This technique is based on the detection
of DNA strand breaks in the single cells (31).Damage is quantified as comet tail moment, which
represents the extent of DNA damage in individual
cells (32). The comet assay is also a precise and
appropriate method for evaluating cell death based
on DNA damage in spheroid cultures (33).In the present study, we have investigated the combined
effect of 2ME2 and 60Co on the level of induced
DNA damage caused by IUdR in the spheroid
model of the U87MGglioblastoma cell line. U87MG
is an established cell line that can self-assemble into
large, stable spheroids through a combination of
intracellular communication and diffusion. In this
study, we used spheroids with 350 µm diameters.
This guarantees the existence of hypoxic cells.
Materials and Methods
Cell line
Humanglioblastoma cell line U87MG was purchased
from the Pasteur Institute of Iran. This cell
line was cultured in Minimum Essential Medium
(MEM) (Gibco) containing 10% fetal bovine serum
(FBS) (Biosera), 100 U/ml of penicillin and
100 mg/ml of streptomycin (Biosera).
Monolayer cultureA
Cells were cultured as a monolayer at a density of
104 cells/cm2 in T-25 tissue culture flasks (NUNC).
Cultures were maintained at 37℃ in a humidified
atmosphere and 5% CO2. Cells were harvested
by trypsinizing cultures with 0.25% trypsin and
0.03% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)
(Sigma) in phosphate buffer saline (PBS).
Spheroid culture
Spheroids were cultured using the liquid overlay
technique. 5 × 105 cells were seeded into 100 mm
petridishes (Greiner) coated with a thin layer of
1% agar with 10 ml of MEM supplemented with
10% FBS. The plates were incubated at 37℃ in a
humidified atmosphere and 5% CO2. Half of the
culture medium was replaced with fresh culture
medium every three days.
IGrowth curve
After three passages of monolayer culture, Cells
were cultured at a density of 10000 per well in
multiwell plates (24 wells/plate) (Greiner). The
multiwell was incubated at 37℃ in a humidified
atmosphere and 5% CO2. For nine days, at 24-hour
intervals, the cells from triplicate wells were removed
by 1mM EDTA/0.25% trypsin (w/v) treatment
and counted in a hemocytometer. An average
of nine counts was used to define each point
(Mean ± SEM). Half of the culture medium was
replaced with fresh medium twice per week. Then
the growth curve was plotted. In the linear area or
logarithmic phase of the curve, the cells follow this
equation:
N=N0 × ebt
Here N0 is the initial number of the cells, N is the
number of the cells after time t, and b shows the
gradient of the logarithmic phase of the curve.
Then, the population doubling time of the cells is
determined according to the gradient of the logarithmic
phase of the curve.
Drug treatment and Gamma radiation
U87MG cells were cultured as spheroids with 350
µm diameters. As control, the spheroids on one plate
were not treated. Other cultures were pretreated with
2ME2 (250µM) for one 1 VDT. After this time, the
subsequent treatments were performed according to
the following groups:
Then the DNA damage was evaluated using the alkaline
comet assay method.Vehicle (this sample was not treated in the 2nd
VDT)Treated with 2ME2 (250 µM) for 1 VDTTreated simultaneously with 2ME2 (250 µM)
and IUdR (1 µM) for 1 VDTTreated with 2ME2 (250 µM) for 1 VDT then
irradiated with 60Co (2 Gy)
(34)Treated simultaneously with 2ME2 (250 µM)
and IUdR (1 µM) for 1 VDT then irradiated with
60Co (2 Gy)
Trypan blue exclusion assay
A suspension of treated and control single cells from
spheroid cultures were mixed with trypan blue at a
ratio of 9:1. After a few minutes the mixture was
examined under a light microscope (Leica, DMLS),
and the blue cells were considered dead. The percentage
of unstained cells out of the total number of
cells was the viability of each cell category.
Comet assay
The induction of DNA damage due to 2ME2 alone or
in combination with IUdR and 60Co was determined
by alkaline comet assay in U87MG spheroid cells.
The alkaline comet assay in this study was a modification
of the method described by Singh et al. (35).
Ordinary microscope slides were coated with 1%
normal melting point agarose (Merck). The treated
and control cells were counted in a hemocytometer
(36) and approximately 10,000 cells in 10 µl PBS
were suspended in 100 µL of 0.5% low melting
point agarose (Merck). The cell suspension was rapidly
pipetted onto the first agarose layer. The slides
were allowed to solidify, then immersed in freshly
prepared lysis buffer (2.5 M NaCl, 100 mM EDTA,
10 mM Tris-base with 1% Triton X-100, pH=10)
and incubated for an hour. From that point on, all
the steps were performed at 4℃. The slides were
removed from the lysis buffer and placed in a horizontal
gel electrophoresis tank (Cleaver Scientific
Ltd, CSL-COM20) which was filled with fresh cold
denaturation buffer (300 mM NaOH, 1mM EDTA,
pH=13). The slides were left in the solution for 30
minutes. Electrophoresis was conducted in the same
denaturation buffer for 30 minutes using 1V/cm
voltage and a current of 300 mA. Following electrophoresis,
the slides were washed in Tris buffer
(0.4 M Tris-HCl, pH=7.5) to neutralize the excess
alkali. Finally, the slides were stained with ethidium
bromide (20 µg/mL). The individual cells or comets
were viewed and photographed using a fluorescent
microscope (Zeiss, Axioskop 2 plus) equipped with
an ethidium bromide filter (excitation filter, 535 nm;
emission filter, 610 nm) and a CCD camera (Hitachi,
KP-D20BP). The photographs were analyzed
using Comet Score® software. Figure 1 shows the
capture of an image from the microscope camera using
Comet Score software.Capture of an image from the microscope camera
using Comet Score software
Evaluation of DNA damage
A total of 100 individual cells on each slide and
three slides for each sample were scored visually
as belonging to one of five predefined classes according
to tail length, and given a value of 0, 1, 2,
3, or 4 (from no tailing, 0, to maximally tailing, 4).The total score for comets could range from 0 (all
no tailing) to 400 (all maximally tailing).DD (au) = (0n0 + 1n1+ 2n2+ 3n3 + 4n4) ∕ (Σn ∕100)Where DD (au) is the arbitrary unit DNA damage
score, n0-n4 is the number of class 0-4 comets, and
Σn is the total number of scored comets. Coefficients
0-4 are weighting factors for each class of
comet (37, 38). One may suspect that the visual
classification may be inferior to computerized
analyses, such as tail moment analysis of images
captured by CCD camera. DNA damage was quantified
as an increase in tail moment, the product of
the amount of DNA (fluorescence) in the tail, and
the distance between the means of the head and tail
fluorescence distributions.
Statistical analysis
Data were given as mean ± SEM, with 'n' denoting
the number of experiments. Statistical analysis
was performed using one-way analysis of variance
(ANOVA) followed by Tukey's test as the posthoc
analysis using SPSS version 12. The value of
p<0.05 was considered to be significant.
Results
Cell characteristics
Monolayer culture
The U87MGglioblastoma cell line grows as a
monolayer on tissue culture flasks. Figure 2 shows
the phase contrast micrographs of the monolayer
culture of the U87MG cell line. The growth curve
of these cells in the monolayer culture is shown in
figure 3. The population doubling time calculated
from this curve was approximately 29.94 hours.Phase contrast micrograph of U87MG cells in the
monolayer culture with ×10 magnification
Spheroid culture
The U87MG cells could form spheroids in liquid
overlay cultures. Figure 4 shows the phase contrast
micrograph of these spheroids with 350 µm diameters
24 days after culture initiation. At this time,
spheroids had formed completely into well-rounded
structures composed of numerous highly compact
cells in which it was difficult to distinguish individual
cells from each other (39). In general, the
formation time of spheroids depends on the initial
number of cells plated. For instance, when 5x105
cells were plated in the 100 mm petridishes on a
thin layer of agar, the spheroids were formed within
two to three days. The volume doubling time
of these spheroids is approximately 67 hours (34),
which was applied as the drug treatment time. The
comet assay was used for the evaluation of DNA
damage after the drug treatment and radiation.Growth curve of U87MG cell line in the monolayer cultures.
An average of nine counts was used to define each point.
Mean ± SEM of three experiments.Phase contrast micrograph of U87MG cell spheroid
with 350 µm diameter on day 24 after culture initiation.
Magnification is ×10
DNA damage
Alkaline comet assays were used for the evaluation
of DNA damage. Figure 5 shows the intercellular
distribution of DNA migration (number
of cells in the five visual comet classes) among
control and treated cells. We observed a significant
increase in the number of comets scored in
the visual class with the combination treatment
of 2ME2 + IUdR + irradiation of 60Co. Exposure
to 2ME2 + IUdR + irradiation of 60Co revealed
that the majority of comets were progressively
distributed to the next visual category of higher
DNA damage. Figure 6 shows the images of
single cell gel electrophoresis (comet assay) of
U87MG cells of 350 µm spheroids after pretreatment
for 67 hours (one volume doubling time)
with 250 µM 2ME2 and treatment for the next
volume doubling time with 2ME2, IUdR and 60C
gamma radiation.Distribution of DNA migrations (stages 0 to 4) among
U87MG cells of 350 µm spheroids after pretreatment for 67
hours (one volume doubling time) with 250 µM 2ME2 and
treatment for the next volume doubling time with 2ME2,
IUdR and 60Co gamma radiation. Data based on the analysis
of 100 cells per slide, triplicate slides per samples.The average tail moments in each category of cells
was used as an indication of DNA damage. Table 1A,
B and figure 7A, B show quantitative measurements
of DNA damage by the comet score program. They
show respectively the induced DNA damage (DD0)
and the net induced DNA damage (DD-DD0). As
can be seen in both figures and tables, 2ME2 can significantly
increase the DNA damage (p<0.001). The
extent of damage in the 2ME2 group is significantly
more than in the vehicle group (p<0.001). In other
words, with the increase of incubation time from 1
VDT to 2 VDT in pretreated 2ME2 spheroids, DNA
damage increases in the cells. Moreover, simultaneous
treatment of cells with 2ME2 and IUdR can
significantly increase the tail moment as compared
to 2ME2 (p<0.001), as shown in the comparison of
2ME2 + 60Co with the 2ME2 group. Furthermore, the
DNA damage significantly increased in the presence
of 2ME2 + IUdR + irradiation of 60Co as compared to
the two groups of 2ME2 + IUdR and 2ME2 + 60Co
(p<0.001).Table 2 shows the increasing DNA damage percentage
in 350 µm spheroids in the three groups
of 2ME2/IUdR, 2ME2/60Co and 2ME2/IUdR/60Co
in comparison with the group of 2ME2. As can be
seen, the effect of combined treatment with 2ME2/
IUdR/60Co is greater than the sum of the effects of
the two groups of IUdR/2ME2 and 60Co/2ME2.Images of single cell gel electrophoresis (comet assay) of U87MG cells of
350 µm spheroids after pretreatment for 67 hours (one volume doubling time)
with 250 µM 2ME2 and treatment for the next volume doubling time with 2ME2,
IUdR and 60Co gamma radiation. Samples as follows: A. control, samples B to
F were pretreated with 250µM 2ME2 and then treated as follows: B. vehicle, C.
2ME2, D. 2ME2 + IUdR, E. 2ME2 +The effects of drugs and radiation on A) induced
DNA strand breaks (DD and B) net induced DNA strand
breaks (DD - DD of U87MG cells from spheroid cultures.
Single cells were analyzed for DNA single strand breaks.
Tail moment, an indication of DNA strand breakage, was
measured using the alkaline comet assay. Means ± SEM of
three experiments.
Discussion
IUdR is a halogenated thymidine analogue which
incorporates into DNA instead of thymidine during
DNA replication and increases the radiosensitization
of the cells (7). When the tumor size is increased, the
cells in the median layers suffer from hypoxia due to
oxygen deficiency, and the cells respond to hypoxia
through the G0 arrest (8). In this condition, IUdR absorption
is significantly reduced (9). HIF-1α is the
key regulatory element of the hypoxic response of
cells. Enhancement of this protein level causes an
increased progression into the G0 phase (10).The best-known molecular process, which is necessary
for the G1/S phase transition, is retinoblastoma
(RB) phosphorylation. Studies show that
the arrest in the cell cycle by hypoxia in the G1
phase depends on the decrease in CDK activity.
The CDK activity can be inhibited by cycline dependent
kinase inhibitors (CDKIs) such as p21 and
p27. These inhibitors cause RB hypophosphorylation
and consequently promote a G1 arrest (40-42).
2-Methoxystradiol can inhibit HIF-1α expression
and prevent this protein’s activity in hypoxia (21).
2ME2 is an estrogen metabolite that inhibits the
proliferation, migration and endothelial cell invasion
(21, 22). Although 2ME2 is an estrogen metabolite,
it has low affinity to estrogen receptors
and its antiproliferation activity is independent
of the estrogen receptor interaction (43). Recent
studies have shown that 2ME2 inhibits HIF-1α by
depolymerizing microtubules (23). 2ME2 binds to
the colchicine-binding site of tubulin (a site that
is at the α/β tubulin interface near α tubulin) and
disrupts lateral contacts between protofilaments,
which leads to microtubule depolymerization (44).
It has been suggested that some physiological differences
may exist between cell growth in two-dimensional
cultures (monolayer cultures) and multicellular
tumor spheroids (44-46). A research conducted
on the growth of humanglioma cells in these two
systems showed different degrees of sensitivity to
radioionated IUdR (47). Several authors have reported
a higher radioresistance of cells in spheroids
compared with monolayer cultures. The radioresistance
of spheroid cultures is attributed to the hypoxic
cells in the median layer of the spheroid (48-51).In the present study, we have examined IUdR radiosensitization
combined with 2ME2 in spheroid cultures
of humanglioblastoma cell line U87MG. This experiment
was performed with 350µm diameter spheroids.
This guarantees the existence of the hypoxic and G0
cells. Our previous studies showed that IUdR significantly
increases cell damage compared to the control
group and as a radiosensitizer it can increase radiationinduced
DNA strand breaks (34). Our results reveal
that 2ME2 pretreatment significantly increases the
cell damage compared to the control group.The ability of 2ME2 to induce damage and prevent
tumor growth correlates with its antitumor effects.
The antitumor effects of 2ME2 on cancer cells involve
the activation of apoptotic cascades. 2ME2
is able to initiate apoptosis by different pathways
such as the activation of cell surface death receptors
and the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway (21).
The present study revealed that 2ME2 inhibits proliferation
and promotes apoptosis of glioma cells.
Moreover, increasing the incubation time from
1 VDT to 2 VDT in pretreated 2ME2 cells leads
to the enhancement of cell damage. Due to an increase
in the spheroid size, the hypoxic cells in the
median layers of the spheroid, as well as the HIF-
1α protein expression, increase.Our hypothesis is that 2ME2 treatment in the second
VDT prevents the new HIF-1α protein expression
and suppresses the activity of previous HIF-1α
proteins, consequently enhancing the DNA damage.
In addition, the cell treatment with 2ME2 and IUdR
simultaneously increases the cell damage before
and after radiation. These results show that using
2ME2 in glioma cells can increase the cell damage
induced by the IUdR radiosensitizer significantly.
The reason for this is 2ME2 inhibiting the HIF-1α
protein. By suppressing the activity and expression
of HIF-1α, 2ME2 causes an increased progression
into S phase and increases the IUdR absorption.
Then the enhanced absorption of IUdR leads to increased
damage of DNA. The inhibition of HIF-1α
by 2ME2 is due to the decrease in HIF-1α protein
levels, which is a result of either the protein synthesis
reduction or the increase in protein degradation,
or both. Furthermore, the DNA damage is greater in
the presence of 2ME2 when the cells are irradiated
by 60Co, compared to treatment with IUdR. This
could be due to an increase in the extent of damage
in irradiated cells. The types of damage include
exchanging in organic bases and sugar components
of DNA, as well as the inducement of DNA single
and double strand breaks (52).
Conclusion
Combined treatment with 2ME2 and 60Co significantly
increased the damage caused by IUdR. Our
findings support the pretreatment of cells with
2ME2/IUdR before irradiation with 60Co to enhance
tumor radiosensitization and possibly improve the
therapeutic index for radiation. Our purpose for
further studies is to make use of a carrier such as
nanoparticles to increase delivery of IUdR into cells
and its uptake into the DNA, and then evaluate the
combined effects of these agents on the cells.
A
Group
Tail moment ± SE
Pretreatment (1st VDT)
Treatment (2nd VDT)
2ME2
Control
0.518 ± 0.047
Vhicle
1.768 ± 0.057
2ME2
2.366 ± 0.065
2ME2+IUdR
3.296 ± 0.072
2ME2+Co
4.418 ± 0.124
2ME2+IUdR+Co
5.907 ± 0.162
B
Group
Tail moment ± SE
Pretreatment (1st VDT)
Treatment (2nd VDT)
2ME2
Control
0 ± 0
Vhicle
1.249 ± 0.018
2ME2
1.848 ± 0.016
2ME2+IUdR
2.778 ± 0.025
2ME2+Co
3.899 ± 0.107
2ME2+IUdR+Co
5.389 ± 0.151
Table 2
Increases in DNA damage percentages in U87MG
spheroids in three groups of 2ME2/IUdR, 2ME2/ and
2ME2/IUdR/ in comparison with the group of 2ME2
Increase in DNA damage percentage in
group of 2ME2/ IUdR in comparison with 2ME2
Increase in DNA damage percentage in group of
2ME2/60Co in comparison with 2ME2
Increase in DNA damage percentage in group of 2ME2/
IUdR/60Co in comparison with 2ME2
Authors: M D Walker; E Alexander; W E Hunt; C S MacCarty; M S Mahaley; J Mealey; H A Norrell; G Owens; J Ransohoff; C B Wilson; E A Gehan; T A Strike Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 1978-09 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: S B Green; D P Byar; M D Walker; D A Pistenmaa; E Alexander; U Batzdorf; W H Brooks; W E Hunt; J Mealey; G L Odom; P Paoletti; J Ransohoff; J T Robertson; R G Selker; W R Shapiro; K R Smith; C B Wilson; T A Strike Journal: Cancer Treat Rep Date: 1983-02
Authors: R P Araldi; T C Melo; N Diniz; J Mazzuchelli-de-Souza; R F Carvalho; W Beçak; R C Stocco Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2013-07-15 Impact factor: 3.411