Literature DB >> 23508029

Effects of dietary soybean hulls and wheat middlings on body composition, nutrient and energy retention, and the net energy of diets and ingredients fed to growing and finishing pigs.

L L Stewart1, D Y Kil, F Ji, R B Hinson, A D Beaulieu, G L Allee, J F Patience, J E Pettigrew, H H Stein.   

Abstract

The objectives of this experiment were 1) to determine the effect of dietary soybean hulls (SBH) and wheat middlings (WM) on body composition, nutrient and energy retention, and the NE of diets and ingredients fed to growing or finishing pigs and 2) to determine if finishing pigs use the energy in SBH and WM more efficiently than growing pigs. Forty growing barrows (initial BW: 25.4 ± 0.7 kg) and 40 finishing barrows (initial BW: 84.8 ± 0.9 kg) were randomly allotted to 5 groups within each stage of growth. Two groups at each stage of growth served as the initial slaughter group. The remaining pigs were randomly assigned to 3 dietary treatments and harvested at the conclusion of the experiment. The basal diet was based on corn and soybean meal and was formulated to be adequate in all nutrients. Two additional diets were formulated by mixing 70% of the basal diet and 30% SBH or 30% WM. In the growing phase, ADG, G:F, and retention of lipids were greater (P < 0.05) for pigs fed the basal diet than for pigs fed the diets containing SBH or WM. Retention of energy was also greater (P < 0.05) for pigs fed the basal diet than for pigs fed the SBH. In the finishing phase, pigs fed the SBH diet tended (P = 0.10) to have a greater ADG than pigs fed the WM diet, and energy retention was greater (P < 0.05) for pigs fed the basal diet than for pigs fed the WM diet. The NE of the basal diet fed to growing pigs was greater (P < 0.01) than the NE of the diets containing SBH or WM, and there was a tendency for a greater (P = 0.05) NE of the basal diet than of the other diets when fed to finishing pigs. The NE of SBH did not differ from the NE of WM in either growing or finishing pigs, and there was no interaction between ingredients and stage of growth on the NE of diets or ingredients. The NE of diets for growing pigs (1,668 kcal/kg) was not different from the NE of diets for finishing pigs (1,823 kcal/kg), and the NE of the diets containing SBH (1,688 kcal/kg) was not different from the NE of the diets containing WM (1,803 kcal/kg). Likewise, the NE of SBH (603 kcal/kg) did not differ from the NE of WM (987 kcal/kg). In conclusion, inclusion of 30% SBH or WM decreases the performance and nutrient retention in growing pigs but has little impact on finishing pigs. The NE of the diets decreases with the inclusion of SBH and WM, but the NE of diets and ingredients is not affected by the BW of pigs. The NE of SBH is not different from the NE of WM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23508029     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2012-5147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  10 in total

1.  Degradation of dietary fiber in the stomach, small intestine, and large intestine of growing pigs fed corn- or wheat-based diets without or with microbial xylanase.

Authors:  Jerubella J Abelilla; Hans H Stein
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Effects of withdrawing high-fiber ingredients before marketing on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and intestinal weights.

Authors:  Kyle F Coble; Joel M DeRouchey; Mike D Tokach; Steve S Dritz; Robert D Goodband; Jason C Woodworth
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Greenhouse gases and performance of growing pigs fed wheat-based diets containing wheat millrun and a multi-carbohydrase enzyme.

Authors:  Agbee L Kpogo; Jismol Jose; Josiane C Panisson; Atta K Agyekum; Bernardo Z Predicala; Alvin C Alvarado; Joy M Agnew; Charley J Sprenger; A Denise Beaulieu
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.338

Review 4.  Feed energy evaluation for growing pigs.

Authors:  D Y Kil; B G Kim; H H Stein
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.509

5.  Characterization of dietary energy in Swine feed and feed ingredients: a review of recent research results.

Authors:  D E Velayudhan; I H Kim; C M Nyachoti
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.509

Review 6.  Methodologies on estimating the energy requirements for maintenance and determining the net energy contents of feed ingredients in swine: a review of recent work.

Authors:  Zhongchao Li; Hu Liu; Yakui Li; Zhiqian Lv; Ling Liu; Changhua Lai; Junjun Wang; Fenglai Wang; Defa Li; Shuai Zhang
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2018-05-16

Review 7.  The role of dietary fibre in pig production, with a particular emphasis on reproduction.

Authors:  Selene Jarrett; Cheryl J Ashworth
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2018-08-06

8.  Effects of short-term feeding with high fiber diets on growth, utilization of dietary fiber, and microbiota in pigs.

Authors:  Guang Pu; Liming Hou; Taoran Du; Binbin Wang; Hang Liu; Kaijun Li; Peipei Niu; Wuduo Zhou; Ruihua Huang; Pinghua Li
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 6.064

Review 9.  Physiological function and application of dietary fiber in pig nutrition: A review.

Authors:  Hao Li; Jie Yin; Bie Tan; Jiashun Chen; Haihan Zhang; Zhiqing Li; Xiaokang Ma
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2021-04-17

10.  The Implications of Nutritional Strategies that Modify Dietary Energy and Lysine for Growth Performance in Two Different Swine Production Systems.

Authors:  Pau Aymerich; Carme Soldevila; Jordi Bonet; Josep Gasa; Jaume Coma; David Solà-Oriol
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 2.752

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.