| Literature DB >> 23507925 |
Brian B Ratliff1, Michael S Goligorsky1.
Abstract
Adoptive transfer of stem cells has shown potential as an effective treatment for acute kidney injury (AKI). The current strategy for adoptive transfer of stem cells is by intravenous injection. However, this conventional method of stem cell delivery is riddled with problems causing reduced efficacy of the therapeutic potential of delivered stem cells. This review summarizes the recent advancements in an alternative method of stem cell delivery for treatment of AKI, embedding stem cells in hyaluronic acid (HA-) based hydrogels followed by their implantation. Furthermore, one stem cell type in particular, endothelial progenitor cells (EPC), have shown remarkable therapeutic benefits for treatment of AKI when delivered by HA-hydrogels. The review also summarizes the delivery of EPC by HA-hydrogels in the setting of AKI.Entities:
Keywords: Adriamycin-induced kidney injury; acute kidney injury; endothelial progenitor cells; endotoxemia; hyaluronic acid based hydrogels; sepsis; stem cell therapy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23507925 PMCID: PMC3732320 DOI: 10.4161/biom.23284
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomatter ISSN: 2159-2527

Figure 1. Schematic of the implantation of HA-hydrogels and subsequent release and mobilization of embedded EPC for treatment of AKI in a mouse model. 1) HA-hydrogels with embedded EPC are implanted either superficially into ears or subcapsularly into kidneys. 2) Induction of AKI (cyto-/endotoxins). 3a) Kidney implants are digested by endogenous release of hyaluronidase from the kidneys during AKI and embedded EPC are mobilized into the kidney, or 3b) ear implants are digested by direct injection of hydrogel-digesting enzymes and embedded EPC are mobilized into the circulation. 4) Released EPC generate therapeutic effects (see Tables 1 and 2).
Table 1. The improvement in various systemic and local parameters during sepsis- and Adriamycin-induced AKI after treatment by adoptive transfer of EPC by either conventional IV delivery or implantation of HA-hydrogels with embedded EPC
| Mean blood pressure | ++ | +++ |
| Hepatic enzymes (ALT and AST) | + | +++ |
| Bone marrow EPC colony forming ability | ++ | +++ |
| Serum creatinine | ++ | ++++ |
| Intrarenal microcirculation | ++ | ++++ |
| EPC engraftment | + | +++ |
| Cytokines/chemokines | ++ | +++ |
| Proteinuria | ++ | +++ |
| Long-term fibrosis | +++ | ++++ |
All parameters were measured 18–36 h after induction of AKI, except long-term proteinuria and fibrosis, which were measured 3 weeks and 2 mo, respectively, after AKI induction. + denotes improvement
Table 2. The summary of systemic and renal effects when EPC are delivered by HA-hydrogel embedding and transplantation as compared with conventional IV injection during AKI
| Systemic therapeutic effects | Renal therapeutic effects |
|---|---|
| Normalized mean blood pressure | Increased renal EPC engraftment |
| Reduced release of ALT/AST | Enhanced cortical and medullary |
| Improved competence of | Improved proteinuria |
| Reduced release of pro- | Improved serum creatinine |
| Enhanced release of anti- | Decreased fibrosis |
| Enhanced release of pro-angiogenic |

Figure 2.Schematic representation (left) and corresponding images (right) (40x magnification) of EPC treated with 10 ug/ml LPS for 24 h. During LPS treatment, EPC were plated on culture plates (A) (without HA-hydrogel embedding), embedded in HA-hydrogels (B), or embedded in HA-hydrogels along with MSC (C). Embedding EPC in HA-hydrogels improved EPC viability and resistance to endotoxins, an effect that was considerably enhanced when EPC were co-embedded with MSC. To determine cell viability, cells were subject to a LIVE/DEAD assay in which live cells were stained green with calcein and dead cells were stained red with ethidium homodimer.