OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the toxicity and tolerability of the intraperitoneal/intravenous regimen by comparing the modified regimen that is used at the Moffitt Cancer Center vs the published findings of the Gynecologic Oncology Group Study 172. STUDY DESIGN: Using the Moffitt database, we evaluated the outcomes of patients who underwent primary optimal cytoreduction for stage IIC-IV epithelial ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal carcinoma followed by the intent-to-treat with intraperitoneal/intravenous chemotherapy. National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3.0) was used to grade adverse events. RESULTS: We analyzed patient data from 2006-2011 and identified 69 patients who met our inclusion criteria. The most frequent grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (48%), gastrointestinal (9%), metabolic (9%), and infection (5%). Remaining toxicities occurred in <5% of patients. Patients received a greater number of cycles compared with the Gynecologic Oncology Group Study 172 (4.28 vs 3.66, respectively; P = .0088). CONCLUSION: With the use of supportive care and the preemptive management of established side-effects, the associated toxicities and tolerability of intraperitoneal chemotherapy can be improved.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the toxicity and tolerability of the intraperitoneal/intravenous regimen by comparing the modified regimen that is used at the Moffitt Cancer Center vs the published findings of the Gynecologic Oncology Group Study 172. STUDY DESIGN: Using the Moffitt database, we evaluated the outcomes of patients who underwent primary optimal cytoreduction for stage IIC-IV epithelial ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal carcinoma followed by the intent-to-treat with intraperitoneal/intravenous chemotherapy. National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3.0) was used to grade adverse events. RESULTS: We analyzed patient data from 2006-2011 and identified 69 patients who met our inclusion criteria. The most frequent grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (48%), gastrointestinal (9%), metabolic (9%), and infection (5%). Remaining toxicities occurred in <5% of patients. Patients received a greater number of cycles compared with the Gynecologic Oncology Group Study 172 (4.28 vs 3.66, respectively; P = .0088). CONCLUSION: With the use of supportive care and the preemptive management of established side-effects, the associated toxicities and tolerability of intraperitoneal chemotherapy can be improved.
Authors: Rudy S Suidan; Qin Zhou; Alexia Iasonos; Roisin E O'Cearbhaill; Dennis S Chi; Kara C Long Roche; Edward J Tanner; John Denesopolis; Richard R Barakat; Oliver Zivanovic Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: Giovanni Di Lorenzo; Giuseppe Ricci; Giovanni Maria Severini; Federico Romano; Stefania Biffi Journal: Theranostics Date: 2018-07-30 Impact factor: 11.556
Authors: Oystein Helland; Mihaela Popa; Olav K Vintermyr; Anders Molven; Bjørn Tore Gjertsen; Line Bjørge; Emmet McCormack Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-03-04 Impact factor: 3.240