OBJECTIVE: To determine whether cognitive behavior therapy (CBT), which we had shown in a previous study to restore ovarian function in women with functional hypothalamic amenorrhea (FHA), could also ameliorate hypercortisolemia and improve other neuroendocrine and metabolic concomitants of in FHA. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Clinical research center at an academic medical university. PATIENT(S): Seventeen women with FHA were randomized either to CBT or observation. INTERVENTION(S): CBT versus observation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Circulatory concentrations of cortisol, leptin, thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), total and free thyronine (T(3)), and total and free thyroxine (T(4)) before and immediately after completion of CBT or observation. (Each woman served as her own control.) RESULT(S): Cognitive behavior therapy but not observation reduced cortisol levels in women with FHA. There were no changes in cortisol, leptin, TSH, T(3), or T(4) levels in women randomized to observation. Women treated with CBT showed increased levels of leptin and TSH, but their levels of T(3) and T(4) remained unchanged. CONCLUSION(S): In women with FHA, CBT ameliorated hypercortisolism and improved the neuroendocrine and metabolic concomitants of FHA while observation did not. We conclude that a cognitive, nonpharmacologic approach aimed at alleviating problematic attitudes not only can restore ovarian activity but also improve neuroendocrine and metabolic function in women with FHA. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01674426.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether cognitive behavior therapy (CBT), which we had shown in a previous study to restore ovarian function in women with functional hypothalamic amenorrhea (FHA), could also ameliorate hypercortisolemia and improve other neuroendocrine and metabolic concomitants of in FHA. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Clinical research center at an academic medical university. PATIENT(S): Seventeen women with FHA were randomized either to CBT or observation. INTERVENTION(S): CBT versus observation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Circulatory concentrations of cortisol, leptin, thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), total and free thyronine (T(3)), and total and free thyroxine (T(4)) before and immediately after completion of CBT or observation. (Each woman served as her own control.) RESULT(S): Cognitive behavior therapy but not observation reduced cortisol levels in women with FHA. There were no changes in cortisol, leptin, TSH, T(3), or T(4) levels in women randomized to observation. Women treated with CBT showed increased levels of leptin and TSH, but their levels of T(3) and T(4) remained unchanged. CONCLUSION(S): In women with FHA, CBT ameliorated hypercortisolism and improved the neuroendocrine and metabolic concomitants of FHA while observation did not. We conclude that a cognitive, nonpharmacologic approach aimed at alleviating problematic attitudes not only can restore ovarian activity but also improve neuroendocrine and metabolic function in women with FHA. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01674426.
Authors: B Meczekalski; A Tonetti; P Monteleone; F Bernardi; S Luisi; M Stomati; M Luisi; F Petraglia; A R Genazzani Journal: Eur J Endocrinol Date: 2000-03 Impact factor: 6.664
Authors: D M Hurley; R Brian; K Outch; J Stockdale; A Fry; C Hackman; I Clarke; H G Burger Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1984-04-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Corrine K Welt; Jean L Chan; John Bullen; Robyn Murphy; Patricia Smith; Alex M DePaoli; Aspasia Karalis; Christos S Mantzoros Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-09-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Karl R Hansen; Amy Linnea W He; Aaron K Styer; Robert A Wild; Samantha Butts; Lawrence Engmann; Michael P Diamond; Richard S Legro; Christos Coutifaris; Ruben Alvero; Randal D Robinson; Peter Casson; Gregory M Christman; Hao Huang; Nanette Santoro; Esther Eisenberg; Heping Zhang Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2016-03-03 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Jerilynn C Prior; Chiaki Konishi; Christine L Hitchcock; Elaine Kingwell; Patti Janssen; Anthony P Cheung; Nichole Fairbrother; Azita Goshtasebi Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-05-18 Impact factor: 3.390