Literature DB >> 23507249

Wastewater management and Marcellus Shale gas development: trends, drivers, and planning implications.

Brian G Rahm1, Josephine T Bates, Lara R Bertoia, Amy E Galford, David A Yoxtheimer, Susan J Riha.   

Abstract

Extraction of natural gas from tight shale formations has been made possible by recent technological advances, including hydraulic fracturing with horizontal drilling. Global shale gas development is seen as a potential energy and geopolitical "game-changer." However, widespread concern exists with respect to possible environmental consequences of this development, particularly impacts on water resources. In the United States, where the most shale gas extraction has occurred, the Marcellus Shale is now the largest natural gas producing play. To date, over 6,000,000 m(3) of wastewater has been generated in the process of extracting natural gas from this shale in the state of Pennsylvania (PA) alone. Here we examine wastewater management practices and trends for this shale play through analysis of industry-reported, publicly available data collected from the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Oil and Gas Reporting Website. We also analyze the tracking and transport of shale gas liquid waste streams originating in PA using a combination of web-based and GIS approaches. From 2008 to 2011 wastewater reuse increased, POTW use decreased, and data tracking became more complete, while the average distance traveled by wastewater decreased by over 30%. Likely factors influencing these trends include state regulations and policies, along with low natural gas prices. Regional differences in wastewater management are influenced by industrial treatment capacity, as well as proximity to injection disposal capacity. Using lessons from the Marcellus Shale, we suggest that nations, states, and regulatory agencies facing new unconventional shale development recognize that pace and scale of well drilling leads to commensurate wastewater management challenges. We also suggest they implement wastewater reporting and tracking systems, articulate a policy for adapting management to evolving data and development patterns, assess local and regional wastewater treatment infrastructure in terms of capacity and capability, promote well-regulated on-site treatment technologies, and review and update wastewater management regulations and policies.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23507249     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.02.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  10 in total

1.  Estimating the Creation and Removal Date of Fracking Ponds Using Trend Analysis of Landsat Imagery.

Authors:  Rutherford V Platt; David Manthos; John Amos
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 2.  Managing produced water from coal seam gas projects: implications for an emerging industry in Australia.

Authors:  Peter J Davies; Damian B Gore; Stuart J Khan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  A web-based multicriteria evaluation of spatial trade-offs between environmental and economic implications from hydraulic fracturing in a shale gas region in Ohio.

Authors:  X Liu; P V Gorsevski; M M Yacobucci; C M Onasch
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 4.  Organic Pollutants in Shale Gas Flowback and Produced Waters: Identification, Potential Ecological Impact, and Implications for Treatment Strategies.

Authors:  Andrii Butkovskyi; Harry Bruning; Stefan A E Kools; Huub H M Rijnaarts; Annemarie P Van Wezel
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Detecting the effects of coal mining, acid rain, and natural gas extraction in Appalachian basin streams in Pennsylvania (USA) through analysis of barium and sulfate concentrations.

Authors:  Xianzeng Niu; Anna Wendt; Zhenhui Li; Amal Agarwal; Lingzhou Xue; Matthew Gonzales; Susan L Brantley
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 4.609

6.  Shale gas development and infant health: Evidence from Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Elaine L Hill
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  Impact of shale gas development on water resources: a case study in northern poland.

Authors:  Ine Vandecasteele; Inés Marí Rivero; Serenella Sala; Claudia Baranzelli; Ricardo Barranco; Okke Batelaan; Carlo Lavalle
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 8.  Hydraulic fracturing: paving the way for a sustainable future?

Authors:  Jiangang Chen; Mohammed H Al-Wadei; Rebekah C M Kennedy; Paul D Terry
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2014-03-25

9.  Cumulative environmental and employment impacts of the shale gas boom.

Authors:  Erin N Mayfield; Jared L Cohon; Nicholas Z Muller; Inês M L Azevedo; Allen L Robinson
Journal:  Nat Sustain       Date:  2019

10.  Response of Aquatic Bacterial Communities to Hydraulic Fracturing in Northwestern Pennsylvania: A Five-Year Study.

Authors:  Nikea Ulrich; Veronica Kirchner; Rebecca Drucker; Justin R Wright; Christopher J McLimans; Terry C Hazen; Maria F Campa; Christopher J Grant; Regina Lamendella
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.