Literature DB >> 23507133

Can anti-Müllerian hormone concentrations be used to determine gonadotrophin dose and treatment protocol for ovarian stimulation?

R Fleming1, F Broekmans, C Calhaz-Jorge, L Dracea, H Alexander, A Nyboe Andersen, C Blockeel, J Jenkins, B Lunenfeld, P Platteau, J Smitz, D de Ziegler.   

Abstract

The ability to predict the response potential of women to ovarian stimulation may allow the development of individualized ovarian stimulation protocols. This tailored approach to ovarian stimulation could reduce the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women predicted to have an excessive response to stimulation or could improve pregnancy outcomes in women classed as poor responders. Namely, variation of the type of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue or the form and dosage of gonadotrophin used for stimulation could be adjusted according to an individual's response potential. The serum concentration of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) is established as a reliable marker of ovarian reserve, with decreasing concentrations correlated with reduced response potential. This review examines the current evidence evaluating individualized ovarian stimulation protocols using AMH concentration as a predictive marker of ovarian response. The rationale behind why specific treatment protocols based on individual response potential may be more suitable is also discussed. Based on current evidence, it appears that the use of AMH serum concentrations to predict ovarian response and optimize treatment strategies is a promising approach for improving pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing ovarian stimulation. However, prospective randomized controlled trials evaluating this approach are needed before any firm conclusions can be drawn.
Copyright © 2013 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23507133     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.02.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  13 in total

1.  Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH Ile(49)Ser) and Anti-Müllerian hormone type II receptor (AMHRII -482 A>G) as genetic markers in assisted reproduction technology.

Authors:  Iro Karagiorga; George A Partsinevelos; Despina Mavrogianni; Elli Anagnostou; Ioannis Zervomanolakis; Konstantinos Kallianidis; Petros Drakakis; Dimitris Loutradis
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-12-27       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Baseline AMH Level Associated With Ovulation Following Ovulation Induction in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.

Authors:  Sunni L Mumford; Richard S Legro; Michael P Diamond; Christos Coutifaris; Anne Z Steiner; William D Schlaff; Ruben Alvero; Gregory M Christman; Peter R Casson; Hao Huang; Nanette Santoro; Esther Eisenberg; Heping Zhang; Marcelle I Cedars
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  CONTROLLED OVARIAN STIMULATION IN ENDOMETRIOSIS PATIENTS CAN BE INDIVIDUALIZED BY ANTI-MÜLLERIAN HORMONE LEVELS.

Authors:  E Hosseini; F Nikmard; B Aflatoonian; S Vesali; T Alenabi; A Aflatoonian; F Mehraein; R Aflatoonian
Journal:  Acta Endocrinol (Buchar)       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 0.877

4.  Successful implantation and live birth of a healthy boy after triple biopsy and double vitrification of oocyte-embryo-blastocyst.

Authors:  Ermanno Greco; Anil Biricik; Rocio P Cotarelo; Elisabetta Iammarone; Patrizia Rubino; Jan Tesarik; Francesco Fiorentino; Maria Giulia Minasi
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-01-14

Review 5.  The Bologna criteria for poor ovarian response: a contemporary critical appraisal.

Authors:  Johnny S Younis; Moshe Ben-Ami; Izhar Ben-Shlomo
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 4.234

6.  Age-specific serum anti-Müllerian hormone concentration in Japanese women and its usefulness as a predictor of the ovarian response.

Authors:  Yoshimasa Asada; Yoshiharu Morimoto; Yoshiharu Nakaoka; Takahiro Yamasaki; Yutaka Suehiro; Hikaru Sugimoto; Masayuki Yoshida; Minoru Irahara
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2017-09-18

7.  Comparative genomic hybridization selection of blastocysts for repeated implantation failure treatment: a pilot study.

Authors:  Ermanno Greco; Sara Bono; Alessandra Ruberti; Anna Maria Lobascio; Pierfrancesco Greco; Anil Biricik; Letizia Spizzichino; Alessia Greco; Jan Tesarik; Maria Giulia Minasi; Francesco Fiorentino
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-03-23       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 8.  How Much Does AMH Really Vary in Normal Women?

Authors:  Antonio La Marca; Valentina Grisendi; Georg Griesinger
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.257

9.  The rate of high ovarian response in women identified at risk by a high serum AMH level is influenced by the type of gonadotropin.

Authors:  Joan-Carles Arce; Bjarke M Klein; Antonio La Marca
Journal:  Gynecol Endocrinol       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 2.260

Review 10.  Anti-Mullerian Hormone: Above and Beyond Conventional Ovarian Reserve Markers.

Authors:  Zehra Jamil; Syeda Sadia Fatima; Khalid Ahmed; Rabia Malik
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.434

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.