BACKGROUND: Rapid-response extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (RR-ECMO) has been implemented at select centers to expedite cannulation for patients placed on ECMO during extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). In 2008, we established such a program and used it for all pediatric venoarterial ECMO initiations. This study was designed to compare outcomes before and after program implementation. METHODS: Between 2003 and 2011, 144 pediatric patients were placed on venoarterial ECMO. Records of patients placed on ECMO before (17 ECPR and 62 non-ECPR) or after (14 ECPR and 51 non-ECPR) RR-ECMO program implementation were retrospectively compared. RESULTS: The peak performance of the ECMO team was assessed by measuring ECMO initiation times for the ECPR patient subgroup (n = 31). There was a shift toward more ECPR initiations achieved in less than 40 minutes (24% pre-RR-ECMO versus 43% RR-ECMO; p = 0.25) and fewer requiring more than 60 minutes (47% pre-RR-ECMO versus 21% RR-ECMO; p = 0.14) after program implementation, although these changes did not reach statistical significance. After multivariable risk adjustment, RR-ECMO was associated with a 52% reduction in neurologic complications for all patients (adjusted odds ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.23 to 0.98; p = 0.04), but the risk of in-hospital death remained unchanged (adjusted odds ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.50 to 1.99; p = 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a pediatric RR-ECMO program for venoarterial ECMO initiation was associated with reduced neurologic complications but not improved survival during the first 3 years of program implementation. These data suggest that development of a coordinated system for rapid ECMO deployment may benefit both ECPR and non-ECPR patients, but further efforts are required to improve survival.
BACKGROUND: Rapid-response extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (RR-ECMO) has been implemented at select centers to expedite cannulation for patients placed on ECMO during extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). In 2008, we established such a program and used it for all pediatric venoarterial ECMO initiations. This study was designed to compare outcomes before and after program implementation. METHODS: Between 2003 and 2011, 144 pediatric patients were placed on venoarterial ECMO. Records of patients placed on ECMO before (17 ECPR and 62 non-ECPR) or after (14 ECPR and 51 non-ECPR) RR-ECMO program implementation were retrospectively compared. RESULTS: The peak performance of the ECMO team was assessed by measuring ECMO initiation times for the ECPR patient subgroup (n = 31). There was a shift toward more ECPR initiations achieved in less than 40 minutes (24% pre-RR-ECMO versus 43% RR-ECMO; p = 0.25) and fewer requiring more than 60 minutes (47% pre-RR-ECMO versus 21% RR-ECMO; p = 0.14) after program implementation, although these changes did not reach statistical significance. After multivariable risk adjustment, RR-ECMO was associated with a 52% reduction in neurologic complications for all patients (adjusted odds ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.23 to 0.98; p = 0.04), but the risk of in-hospital death remained unchanged (adjusted odds ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.50 to 1.99; p = 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a pediatric RR-ECMO program for venoarterial ECMO initiation was associated with reduced neurologic complications but not improved survival during the first 3 years of program implementation. These data suggest that development of a coordinated system for rapid ECMO deployment may benefit both ECPR and non-ECPR patients, but further efforts are required to improve survival.
Authors: Richard Walczak; D Scott Lawson; David Kaemmer; Craig McRobb; Patty McDermott; Greg Smigla; Ian Shearer; Andrew Lodge; James Jaggers Journal: Perfusion Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 1.972
Authors: Ravi R Thiagarajan; Peter C Laussen; Peter T Rycus; Robert H Bartlett; Susan L Bratton Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-09-24 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: B W Duncan; A E Ibrahim; V Hraska; P J del Nido; P C Laussen; D L Wessel; J E Mayer; L K Bower; R A Jonas Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 1998-08 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Kenneth A Michelson; Joel D Hudgins; Michael C Monuteaux; Richard G Bachur; Jonathan A Finkelstein Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Olivier Brissaud; Astrid Botte; Gilles Cambonie; Stéphane Dauger; Laure de Saint Blanquat; Philippe Durand; Véronique Gournay; Elodie Guillet; Daniela Laux; Francis Leclerc; Philippe Mauriat; Thierry Boulain; Khaldoun Kuteifan Journal: Ann Intensive Care Date: 2016-02-16 Impact factor: 6.925
Authors: Hanneke IJsselstijn; Maayke Hunfeld; Raisa M Schiller; Robert J Houmes; Aparna Hoskote; Dick Tibboel; Arno F J van Heijst Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2018-06-26 Impact factor: 3.418