Literature DB >> 23506385

Long-term outcomes of dental implants with a titanium plasma-sprayed surface: a 20-year prospective case series study in partially edentulous patients.

Vivianne Chappuis1, Ramona Buser, Urs Brägger, Michael M Bornstein, Giovanni E Salvi, Daniel Buser.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long-term studies of ≥10 years are important milestones to get a better understanding of potential factors causing implant failures or complications.
PURPOSE: The present study investigated the long-term outcomes of titanium dental implants with a rough, microporous surface (titanium plasma sprayed [TPS]) and the associated biologic and technical complications in partially edentulous patients with fixed dental prostheses over a 20-year follow-up period.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-seven patients, who received 95 implants in the 1980s, were examined with well-established clinical and radiographic parameters. Based on these findings, each implant was classified as either successful, surviving, or failed.
RESULTS: Ten implants in nine patients were lost during the observation period, resulting in an implant survival rate of 89.5%. Radiographically, 92% of the implants exhibited crestal bone loss below 1 mm between the 1- and 20-year follow-up examinations. Only 8% yielded peri-implant bone loss of >1 mm and none exhibited severe bone loss of more than 1.8 mm. During the observation period, 19 implants (20%) experienced a biologic complication with suppuration. Of these 19 implants, 13 implants (13.7%) had been treated and were successfully maintained over the 20-year follow-up period. Therefore, the 20-year implant success rate was 75.8 or 89.5% depending on the different success criteria. Technical complications were observed in 32%.
CONCLUSION: The present study is the first to report satisfactory success rates after 20 years of function of dental implants with a TPS surface in partially edentulous patients.
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biological complications; crestal bone loss; dental implant; implant success rate; implant survival rate; peri-implant bone loss; prospective follow-up study; technical complications; titanium plasma sprayed

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23506385     DOI: 10.1111/cid.12056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  34 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of long-term survival of implants and endodontically treated teeth.

Authors:  F C Setzer; S Kim
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  Peri-implant complications for posterior endosteal implants.

Authors:  Josephine Esquivel-Upshaw; Alex Mehler; Arthur Clark; Dan Neal; Luiz Gonzaga; Kenneth Anusavice
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 5.977

3.  Differentiation, apoptosis, and GM-CSF receptor expression of human gingival fibroblasts on a titanium surface treated by a dual acid-etched procedure.

Authors:  Luca Ramaglia; Gaetano Di Spigna; Gabriele Capece; Carolina Sbordone; Salvatore Salzano; Loredana Postiglione
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Primary bone augmentation leads to equally stable marginal tissue conditions comparing the use of xenograft blocks infused with BMP-2 and autogenous bone blocks: A 3D analysis after 3 years.

Authors:  Stefan P Bienz; Michael Payer; Jenni Hjerppe; Jürg Hüsler; Norbert Jakse; Patrick R Schmidlin; Christoph H F Hämmerle; Ronald E Jung; Daniel S Thoma
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 5.021

5.  What is the prevalence of peri-implantitis? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pedro Diaz; Esther Gonzalo; Luis J Gil Villagra; Barbara Miegimolle; Maria J Suarez
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 3.747

Review 6.  A review on the wettability of dental implant surfaces I: theoretical and experimental aspects.

Authors:  Frank Rupp; Rolando A Gittens; Lutz Scheideler; Abraham Marmur; Barbara D Boyan; Zvi Schwartz; Jürgen Geis-Gerstorfer
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 8.947

7.  Mesenchymal stem cells in maxillary sinus augmentation: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Francesco G Mangano; Marco Colombo; Giovanni Veronesi; Alberto Caprioglio; Carlo Mangano
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 5.326

8.  Assessment of the Tissue Response to Modification of the Surface of Dental Implants with Carboxyethylphosphonic Acid and Basic Fibroblastic Growth Factor Immobilization (Fgf-2): An Experimental Study on Minipigs.

Authors:  Javier Aragoneses; Ana Suárez; Nansi López-Valverde; Francisco Martínez-Martínez; Juan Manuel Aragoneses
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-23

9.  CBCT analysis of the tissue thickness at immediate implant placement with contour augmentation in the maxillary anterior zone: a 1-year prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Yuya Fujita; Tamaki Nakano; Shinji Ono; Takuya Shimomoto; Keiichiro Mizuno; Hirofumi Yatani; Shoichi Ishigaki
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-07-06

10.  Accuracy of digital planning in zygomatic implants.

Authors:  B Xing Gao; O Iglesias-Velázquez; F G F Tresguerres; A Rodríguez González Cortes; I F Tresguerres; R Ortega Aranegui; R M López-Pintor; J López-Quiles; J Torres
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-07-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.