Literature DB >> 23506279

Effect of massage on the efficacy of the mental and incisive nerve block.

A Jaber1, J M Whitworth, I P Corbett, B Al-Baqshi, S Jauhar, J G Meechan.   

Abstract

The purpose of this trial was to assess the effect of soft tissue massage on the efficacy of the mental and incisive nerve block (MINB). Thirty-eight volunteers received MINB of 2.2 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1 : 80,000 epinephrine on 2 occasions. At one visit the soft tissue overlying the injection site was massaged for 60 seconds (active treatment). At the other visit the crowns of the mandibular premolar teeth were massaged (control treatment). Order of treatments was randomized. An electronic pulp tester was used to measure pulpal anesthesia in the ipsilateral mandibular first molar, a premolar, and lateral incisor teeth up to 45 minutes following the injection. The efficacy of pulp anesthesia was determined by 2 methods: (a) by quantifying the number of episodes with no response to maximal electronic pulp stimulation after each treatment, and (b) by quantifying the number of volunteers with no response to maximal pulp stimulation (80 reading) on 2 or more consecutive tests, termed anesthetic success. Data were analyzed by McNemar, Mann-Whitney, and paired-samples t tests. Anesthetic success was 52.6% for active and 42.1% for control treatment for lateral incisors, 89.5 and 86.8% respectively for premolars, and 50.0 and 42.1% respectively for first molars (P = .344, 1.0, and .508 respectively). There were no significant differences in the number of episodes of negative response to maximum pulp tester stimulation between active and control massage. A total of 131 episodes were recorded after both active and control massage in lateral incisors (McNemar test, P = 1.0), 329 (active) versus 316 (control) episodes in the premolars (McNemar test, P = .344), and 119 (active) versus 109 (control) episodes respectively for first molars (McNemar test, P = .444). Speed of anesthetic onset and discomfort did not differ between treatments. We concluded that soft tissue massage after MINB does not influence anesthetic efficacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23506279      PMCID: PMC3601725          DOI: 10.2344/12-00024.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Prog        ISSN: 0003-3006


  14 in total

1.  Anesthetic effectiveness of the supplemental intraligamentary injection, administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system, in patients with irreversible pulpitis.

Authors:  John Nusstein; Elizabeth Claffey; Al Reader; Mike Beck; Joel Weaver
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.171

2.  Anesthetic efficacy of buccal and lingual infiltrations of lidocaine following an inferior alveolar nerve block in mandibular posterior teeth.

Authors:  William Foster; Melissa Drum; Al Reader; Mike Beck
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2007

3.  Influence of injection speed on the effectiveness of incisive/mental nerve block: a randomized, controlled, double-blind study in adult volunteers.

Authors:  John Martin Whitworth; Mohammad Dib Kanaa; Ian Porter Corbett; John Gerald Meechan
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 4.171

4.  The possible role of the mylohyoid nerve in mandibular posterior tooth sensation.

Authors:  J Frommer; F A Mele; C W Monroe
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 3.634

5.  The intramandibular course of the inferior alveolar nerve.

Authors:  R B Carter; E N Keen
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Articaine for supplemental intraosseous anesthesia in patients with irreversible pulpitis.

Authors:  Jason Bigby; Al Reader; John Nusstein; Mike Beck; Joel Weaver
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 4.171

7.  The inferior alveolar and mylohyoid nerves: an anatomic study and relationship to local anesthesia of the anterior mandibular teeth.

Authors:  S Wilson; P Johns; P M Fuller
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 3.634

8.  Anesthetic efficacy of the mylohyoid nerve block and combination inferior alveolar nerve block/mylohyoid nerve block.

Authors:  S Clark; A Reader; M Beck; W J Meyers
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  1999-05

Review 9.  Sensory innervation of mandibular teeth by the nerve to the mylohyoid: implications in local anesthesia.

Authors:  Pamela Stein; Jennifer Brueckner; Matthew Milliner
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.414

10.  Articaine buccal infiltration enhances the effectiveness of lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block.

Authors:  M D Kanaa; J M Whitworth; I P Corbett; J G Meechan
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.264

View more
  3 in total

1.  Anesthetic efficacy of mental/incisive nerve block compared to inferior alveolar nerve block using 4% articaine in mandibular premolars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Sholeh Ghabraei; Ashraf Shubbar; Mohammad H Nekoofar; Ali Nosrat
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Various strategies for pain-free root canal treatment.

Authors:  Masoud Parirokh; Paul V Abbott
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2013-12-24

3.  Design and Massaging Force Analysis of Wearable Flexible Single Point Massager Imitating Traditional Chinese Medicine.

Authors:  Zhou Zhou; Yixuan Wang; Chenjun Zhang; Ao Meng; Bingshan Hu; Hongliu Yu
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 2.891

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.