Literature DB >> 23506278

Ventilation via cut nasotracheal tube during general anesthesia.

Yoshinao Asahi1, Shiro Omichi, Seita Adachi, Hajime Kagamiuchi, Junichiro Kotani.   

Abstract

Many patients with disabilities need recurrent dental treatment under general anesthesia because of high caries prevalence and the nature of dental treatment. We evaluated the use of a nasal device as a possible substitute for flexible laryngeal mask airway to reduce the risk of unexpected failure accompanying intubation; we succeeded in ventilating the lungs with a cut nasotracheal tube (CNT) with its tip placed in the pharynx. We hypothesized that this technique would be useful during dental treatment under general anesthesia and investigated its usefulness as part of a minimally invasive technique. A prospective study was designed using general anesthesia in 37 dental patients with disabilities such as intellectual impairment, autism, and cerebral palsy. CNT ventilation was compared with mask ventilation with the patient in 3 positions: the neck in flexion, horizontal position, and in extension. The effect of mouth gags was also recorded during CNT ventilation. The percentages of cases with effective ventilation were similar for the 2 techniques in the neck extension and horizontal positions (89.2-97.3%). However, CNT ventilation was significantly more effective than mask ventilation in the neck flexion position (94.6 vs 45.9%; P < .0001). Mouth gags slightly reduced the rate of effective ventilation in the neck flexion position. Most dental treatments involving minor oral surgeries were performed using mouth gags during CNT ventilation. CNT ventilation was shown to be superior to mask ventilation and is useful during dental treatment under general anesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23506278      PMCID: PMC3601724          DOI: 10.2344/11-00031.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Prog        ISSN: 0003-3006


  13 in total

Review 1.  [Management of the difficult airway].

Authors:  Masashi Kawamoto
Journal:  Masui       Date:  2010-09

2.  Optimal degree of mouth opening for laryngeal mask airway function during oral surgery.

Authors:  Takuro Sanuki; Shingo Sugioka; Motoko Hirokane; Hiroki Son; Rumiko Uda; Masafumi Akatsuka; Junichiro Kotani
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Airway management after failure to intubate by direct laryngoscopy: outcomes in a large teaching hospital.

Authors:  Christopher M Burkle; Michael T Walsh; Barry A Harrison; Timothy B Curry; Steven H Rose
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2005 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  Application of nasal flexible laryngeal mask airway in anesthesia for oral surgery.

Authors:  Hirofumi Arisaka; Masanao Matsumoto; Munetaka Furuya; Shigeki Sakuraba; Kazu-Ichi Yoshida
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Tube tip in pharynx (TTIP) ventilation: simple establishment of ventilation in case of failed mask ventilation.

Authors:  M S Kristensen
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.105

6.  A tube in the pharynx for emergency ventilation.

Authors:  M Bund; R Walz; W Lobbes; W Seitz
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.105

7.  [Dental injury associated with general anesthesia and the preventive measures].

Authors:  Nobuhiro Ueda; Tadaaki Kirita; Yuichiro Imai; Kotaro Inagake; Yumiko Matsusue; Satoki Inoue; Masahiko Kawaguchi; Hitoshi Furuya
Journal:  Masui       Date:  2010-05

8.  Gas leak and gastric insufflation during controlled ventilation: face mask versus laryngeal mask airway.

Authors:  L M Ho-Tai; J H Devitt; A G Noel; M P O'Donnell
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.063

9.  Cannot ventilate-cannot intubate an infant: surgical tracheotomy or transtracheal cannula?

Authors:  Karina Johansen; Rolf J Holm-Knudsen; Birgitte Charabi; Michael S Kristensen; Lars Simon Rasmussen
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 2.556

10.  A randomised comparison of the single use LMA Flexible with the reusable LMA Flexible in paediatric dental day-case patients.

Authors:  P Flynn; F B Ahmed; V Mitchell; A Patel; S Clarke
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 6.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.