RATIONALE: Patients with acute ischemic stroke and hyperglycemia have worse outcomes than those without hyperglycemia. Intensive glucose control during acute stroke is feasible and can be accomplished safely but has not been fully assessed for efficacy. AIMS: The Stroke Hyperglycemia Insulin Network Effort trial aims to determine the safety and efficacy of standard vs. intensive glucose control with insulin in hyperglycemic acute ischemic stroke patients. DESIGN: This is a randomized, blinded, multicenter, phase III trial of approximately 1400 hyperglycemic patients who receive eitherstandard sliding scale subcutaneous insulin (blood glucose range 80-179 mg/dL, 4·44-9·93 mmol/L) or continuous intravenous insulin (target blood glucose 80-130 mg/dL, 4·44-7·21 mmol/L) for up to 72 h, starting within 12 h of stroke symptom onset. The acute treatment phase is single blind (for the patients), but the final outcome assessment is double blind. The study is powered to detect a 7% absolute difference in favorable outcome at 90 days. STUDY OUTCOMES: The primary outcome is a baseline severity adjusted 90-day modified Rankin Scale score, defined as 0, 0-1, or 0-2, if the baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score is 3-7, 8-14, or 15-22, respectively. The primary safety outcome is the rate of severe hypoglycemia (<40 mg/dL, <2·22 mmol/L). DISCUSSION: This trial will provide important novel information about preferred management of acute ischemic stroke patients with hyperglycemia. It will determine the potential benefits and risks of intensive glucose control during acute stroke.
RCT Entities:
RATIONALE: Patients with acute ischemic stroke and hyperglycemia have worse outcomes than those without hyperglycemia. Intensive glucose control during acute stroke is feasible and can be accomplished safely but has not been fully assessed for efficacy. AIMS: The Stroke HyperglycemiaInsulin Network Effort trial aims to determine the safety and efficacy of standard vs. intensive glucose control with insulin in hyperglycemic acute ischemic strokepatients. DESIGN: This is a randomized, blinded, multicenter, phase III trial of approximately 1400 hyperglycemicpatients who receive either standard sliding scale subcutaneous insulin (blood glucose range 80-179 mg/dL, 4·44-9·93 mmol/L) or continuous intravenous insulin (target blood glucose 80-130 mg/dL, 4·44-7·21 mmol/L) for up to 72 h, starting within 12 h of stroke symptom onset. The acute treatment phase is single blind (for the patients), but the final outcome assessment is double blind. The study is powered to detect a 7% absolute difference in favorable outcome at 90 days. STUDY OUTCOMES: The primary outcome is a baseline severity adjusted 90-day modified Rankin Scale score, defined as 0, 0-1, or 0-2, if the baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score is 3-7, 8-14, or 15-22, respectively. The primary safety outcome is the rate of severe hypoglycemia (<40 mg/dL, <2·22 mmol/L). DISCUSSION: This trial will provide important novel information about preferred management of acute ischemic strokepatients with hyperglycemia. It will determine the potential benefits and risks of intensive glucose control during acute stroke.
Authors: Christopher S Gray; Anthony J Hildreth; Peter A Sandercock; Janice E O'Connell; Donna E Johnston; Niall E F Cartlidge; John M Bamford; Oliver F James; K George M M Alberti Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Harold P Adams; Gregory del Zoppo; Mark J Alberts; Deepak L Bhatt; Lawrence Brass; Anthony Furlan; Robert L Grubb; Randall T Higashida; Edward C Jauch; Chelsea Kidwell; Patrick D Lyden; Lewis B Morgenstern; Adnan I Qureshi; Robert H Rosenwasser; Phillip A Scott; Eelco F M Wijdicks Journal: Stroke Date: 2007-04-12 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: C Savopoulos; G Kaiafa; I Kanellos; A Fountouki; D Theofanidis; A I Hatzitolios Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2016-11-21 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Samkeliso C Mawocha; Michael D Fetters; Laurie J Legocki; Timothy C Guetterman; Shirley Frederiksen; William G Barsan; Roger J Lewis; Donald A Berry; William J Meurer Journal: Clin Trials Date: 2017-01-31 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Matthew B Bevers; Neil H Vaishnav; Ly Pham; Thomas Wk Battey; W Taylor Kimberly Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2016-01-01 Impact factor: 6.200