| Literature DB >> 23506213 |
Xiaolin Pan1, Yuqin Li, Jin Feng, Xiaoyong Wang, Bo Hao, Ruihua Shi, Guoxin Zhang.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Studies on the association between MDM2 SNP309 (T > G) and gastric cancer have reported conflicting results. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate whether MDM2 SNP309 is associated with susceptibility and prognosis of gastric carcinoma in Chinese patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23506213 PMCID: PMC3621260 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-126
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Demographic, clinical and pathological characteristics of study subjects
| Age (Mean ± SD, years) | 58.56 ± 12.09 | 58.29 ± 11.88 | 0.71 |
| Sex (Male/female) | 399/175 | 399/175 | 1.00 |
| Seropositive rate of | 71.1% | 67.9% | 0.25 |
| Location of gastric carcinoma | | | |
| Cardia | 181 | NA | |
| Noncadia | 393 | NA | |
| Vascular invasion | | | |
| Absent | 363 | NA | |
| Present | 211 | NA | |
| Lymph node metastasis | | | |
| Absent | 173 | NA | |
| Present | 401 | NA | |
| Liver metastasis | | NA | |
| Absent | 512 | NA | |
| Present | 62 | NA | |
| Peritoneal dissemination | | | |
| Absent | 503 | NA | |
| Present | 71 | NA | |
| TNM stage | | | |
| IA | 96 | NA | |
| IB | 79 | NA | |
| II | 107 | NA | |
| III | 173 | NA | |
| IV | 119 | NA | |
| Follow-up (months) | | NA | |
| Median (Range) | 36 (4–48) | NA |
Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; NA, not applicable.
The genotype distributions of SNP309 in the cases with gastric carcinoma and healthy controls
| Genotype | | | | | | |
| T/T | 34.7% | 30.1% | 1.00 | | | |
| T/G | 51.6% | 45.3% | 1.01 (0.78-1.32) | 0.94 | 1.01 (0.78-1.31) | 0.95 |
| G/G | 13.7% | 24.6% | 2.05 (1.46-2.89) | < 0.01 | 2.06 (1.46-2.90) | < 0.01 |
| Recessive model | | | | | | |
| T carriers | 86.3% | 75.4% | 1.00 | | | |
| G/G | 13.7% | 24.6% | 2.04 (1.51-2.77) | < 0.01 | 2.05 (1.51-2.78) | < 0.01 |
| Dominant model | | | | | | |
| T/T | 31.2% | 30.1% | 1.00 | | | |
| G carriers | 68.8% | 69.9% | 1.23 (0.96-1.58) | 0.10 | 1.23 (0.96-1.58) | 0.10 |
†Adjusted for age, sex, and H. pylori infection.
Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Association between SNP309 and gastric carcinoma in relation to infection
| T carriers | Negative | 1.00 | |
| T carriers | Positive | 1.14 (0.86-1.51) | 0.37 |
| GG | Negative | 1.94 (1.11-3.38) | 0.02 |
| GG | Positive | 2.44 (1.62-3.66) | < 0.01 |
†Adjusted for age and sex.
Association between SNP309 and gastric in relation to location, metastasis and TNM stage
| Location | | | | | |
| Cardia | 495/141 | 79/40 | 1.00 | 1.84 (1.20-2.83) | < 0.01 |
| Non-cardia | 495/292 | 79/101 | 1.00 | 2.18 (1.57-3.04) | < 0.01 |
| Vascular invasion | | | | | |
| Absent | 495/265 | 79/98 | 1.00 | 2.33 (1.67-3.26) | < 0.01 |
| Present | 495/168 | 79/43 | 1.00 | 1.60 (1.06-2.42) | 0.03 |
| Lymph node metastasis | | | 1.00 | | |
| Absent | 495/138 | 79/35 | 1.00 | 1.59 (1.02-2.47) | 0.04 |
| Present | 495/295 | 79/106 | 1.00 | 2.25 (1.63-3.12) | < 0.01 |
| Liver metastasis | | | 1.00 | | |
| Absent | 495/391 | 79/121 | 1.00 | 1.94 (1.42-2.65) | < 0.01 |
| Present | 495/42 | 79/20 | 1.00 | 3.34 (1.84-6.08) | < 0.01 |
| Peritoneal dissemination | | | | | |
| Absent | 495/380 | 79/123 | 1.00 | 2.04 (1.49-2.79) | < 0.01 |
| Present | 495/53 | 79/18 | 1.00 | 2.13 (1.18-3.84) | 0.01 |
| TNM stage | | | | | |
| IA | 495/75 | 79/21 | 1.00 | 1.75 (1.01-3.00) | 0.04 |
| IB | 495/60 | 79/19 | 1.00 | 2.01 (1.13-3.57) | 0.01 |
| II | 495/83 | 79/24 | 1.00 | 1.78 (1.06-2.98) | 0.03 |
| III | 495/127 | 79/46 | 1.00 | 2.30 (1.52-3.49) | < 0.01 |
| IV | 495/88 | 79/31 | 1.00 | 2.29 (1.42-3.69) | < 0.01 |
†Adjusted for age, sex, and H. pylori infection.
Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 1Association between MDM2 SNP309 and survival of patients with gastric carcinoma according to TNM classification. (A) Kaplan-Meier survival curves of 32 patients with TNM I stage according to MDM2 SNP309 genotypes (P = 0.50). (B) Kaplan-Meier survival curves of 101 patients with TNM II-IV stages according to MDM2 SNP309 genotypes (P < 0.01).
Figure 2Effect of MDM2 SNP309 in the transcriptional activity of MDM2 promoter. Data are expressed as mean and standard deviation of three independent experiments. WT309, cells transfected with allele 309 T; SNP309, cells transfected with allele 309 G; * P < 0.01, compared with WT309.
Figure 3Combined effect of transfection with MDM2 SNP309 (T > G) polymorphism and H. pylori lipopolysaccharide (LPS) on transcriptional activity of MDM2 in AGS cell. WT309, cells transfected with allele 309 T; SNP309, cells transfected with allele 309 G; * P < 0.01, compared with WT309 or SNP309, where appropriate.