Literature DB >> 23505222

Evaluating atmospheric CO2 inversions at multiple scales over a highly inventoried agricultural landscape.

Andrew E Schuh1, Thomas Lauvaux, Tristram O West, A Scott Denning, Kenneth J Davis, Natasha Miles, Scott Richardson, Marek Uliasz, Erandathie Lokupitiya, Daniel Cooley, Arlyn Andrews, Stephen Ogle.   

Abstract

An intensive regional research campaign was conducted by the North American Carbon Program (NACP) in 2007 to study the carbon cycle of the highly productive agricultural regions of the Midwestern United States. Forty-five different associated projects were conducted across five US agencies over the course of nearly a decade involving hundreds of researchers. One of the primary objectives of the intensive campaign was to investigate the ability of atmospheric inversion techniques to use highly calibrated CO2 mixing ratio data to estimate CO2 flux over the major croplands of the United States by comparing the results to an inventory of CO2 fluxes. Statistics from densely monitored crop production, consisting primarily of corn and soybeans, provided the backbone of a well studied bottom-up inventory flux estimate that was used to evaluate the atmospheric inversion results. Estimates were compared to the inventory from three different inversion systems, representing spatial scales varying from high resolution mesoscale (PSU), to continental (CSU) and global (CarbonTracker), coupled to different transport models and optimization techniques. The inversion-based mean CO2 -C sink estimates were generally slightly larger, 8-20% for PSU, 10-20% for CSU, and 21% for CarbonTracker, but statistically indistinguishable, from the inventory estimate of 135 TgC. While the comparisons show that the MCI region-wide C sink is robust across inversion system and spatial scale, only the continental and mesoscale inversions were able to reproduce the spatial patterns within the region. In general, the results demonstrate that inversions can recover CO2 fluxes at sub-regional scales with a relatively high density of CO2 observations and adequate information on atmospheric transport in the region.
© 2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23505222     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  4 in total

1.  Climate-smart soils.

Authors:  Keith Paustian; Johannes Lehmann; Stephen Ogle; David Reay; G Philip Robertson; Pete Smith
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  High-resolution atmospheric inversion of urban CO2 emissions during the dormant season of the Indianapolis Flux Experiment (INFLUX).

Authors:  Thomas Lauvaux; Natasha L Miles; Aijun Deng; Scott J Richardson; Maria O Cambaliza; Kenneth J Davis; Brian Gaudet; Kevin R Gurney; Jianhua Huang; Darragh O'Keefe; Yang Song; Anna Karion; Tomohiro Oda; Risa Patarasuk; Igor Razlivanov; Daniel Sarmiento; Paul Shepson; Colm Sweeney; Jocelyn Turnbull; Kai Wu
Journal:  J Geophys Res Atmos       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 4.261

3.  Intercomparison of atmospheric trace gas dispersion models: Barnett Shale case study.

Authors:  Anna Karion; Thomas Lauvaux; Israel Lopez Coto; Colm Sweeney; Kimberly Mueller; Sharon Gourdji; Wayne Angevine; Zachary Barkley; Aijun Deng; Arlyn Andrews; Ariel Stein; James Whetstone
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 6.133

4.  Emerging reporting and verification needs under the Paris Agreement: How can the research community effectively contribute?

Authors:  Lucia Perugini; Guido Pellis; Giacomo Grassi; Philippe Ciais; Han Dolman; Joanna I House; Glen P Peters; Pete Smith; Dirk Günther; Philippe Peylin
Journal:  Environ Sci Policy       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 5.581

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.