Literature DB >> 23504994

Sonographic predictors of ovarian malignancy.

Lisa Barroilhet1, Allison Vitonis, Thomas Shipp, Michael Muto, Beryl Benacerraf.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify a combination of sonographic features that best predicts ovarian malignancy.
METHODS: Subjects included 249 women who had a transvaginal sonogram for a pelvic mass at Brigham and Women's Hospital between December 2005 and February 2010. Subjects underwent surgery for removal of the mass and pathologic diagnosis was available. Images were reviewed retrospectively by one sonologist blinded to diagnosis and clinical information. Twelve sonographic features were scored for each mass. The dataset was divided into training (n = 149) and testing (n = 100) sets. Within the training set, a stepwise logistic regression was used to weigh each variable and combination of features to identify those associated with malignancies. Using the results from the logistic regression analyses, we created a three-level risk stratification that was applied to the sonograms of subjects in the testing set to assess its ability to distinguish benign lesions from invasive and borderline cancers.
RESULTS: High risk lesions included all masses with internal vascularity. In our testing set, this feature was present in 9 out of 12 (75%) invasive cancers, 1 out of 6 (16.7%) borderline lesions, and 9 out of 82 (11%) benign masses. The intermediate risk level included lesions with a thick wall or thick septa without internal blood flow. This combination of features identified one additional invasive cancer and 5 out of 6 (83.3%) borderline tumors. Masses with low risk features had a 2/49 (4.0%) incidence of malignancy.
CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of high or intermediate risk sonographic features, the risk of malignancy is low.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23504994     DOI: 10.1002/jcu.22014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound        ISSN: 0091-2751            Impact factor:   0.910


  6 in total

1.  Screening for ovarian cancer: imaging challenges and opportunities for improvement.

Authors:  K B Mathieu; D G Bedi; S L Thrower; A Qayyum; R C Bast
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 7.299

2.  Risk of Malignant Ovarian Cancer Based on Ultrasonography Findings in a Large Unselected Population.

Authors:  Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Liina Poder; Eric Johnson; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 21.873

3.  Accuracy of Pelvic Mass Score in Pre-operative Determination of Malignancy in Adnexal Masses.

Authors:  Lakshmi Mohan; Arun Rao; Sonali Ullal; Gowtham Krishna
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-11-01

Review 4.  Current and Emerging Methods for Ovarian Cancer Screening and Diagnostics: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Juliane M Liberto; Sheng-Yin Chen; Ie-Ming Shih; Tza-Huei Wang; Tian-Li Wang; Thomas R Pisanic
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 6.575

5.  The Comparison of Pelvic Mass Score and Risk of Malignancy Index-3 in Discrimination of Benign and Malignant Adnexal Masses.

Authors:  Aliya Isgandarova; Ayse Ender Yumru; Suat Karatas; Burcu Dincgez Cakmak; Betul Dundar; Ulku Ayse Turker
Journal:  Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul       Date:  2020-12-11

6.  Description of Genetic Variants in BRCA Genes in Mexican Patients with Ovarian Cancer: A First Step towards Implementing Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Jesus Rolando Delgado-Balderas; Maria Lourdes Garza-Rodriguez; Gabriela Sofia Gomez-Macias; Alvaro Barboza-Quintana; Oralia Barboza-Quintana; Ricardo M Cerda-Flores; Ivett Miranda-Maldonado; Hugo Mauricio Vazquez-Garcia; Lezmes Dionicio Valdez-Chapa; Mauro Antonio-Macedo; Michael Dean; Hugo A Barrera-Saldaña
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 4.096

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.