Literature DB >> 23504988

Bony pelvic canal size and shape in relation to body proportionality in humans.

Helen K Kurki1.   

Abstract

Obstetric selection acts on the female pelvic canal to accommodate the human neonate and contributes to pelvic sexual dimorphism. There is a complex relationship between selection for obstetric sufficiency and for overall body size in humans. The relationship between selective pressures may differ among populations of different body sizes and proportions, as pelvic canal dimensions vary among populations. Size and shape of the pelvic canal in relation to body size and shape were examined using nine skeletal samples (total female n = 57; male n = 84) from diverse geographical regions. Pelvic, vertebral, and lower limb bone measurements were collected. Principal component analyses demonstrate pelvic canal size and shape differences among the samples. Male multivariate variance in pelvic shape is greater than female variance for North and South Africans. High-latitude samples have larger and broader bodies, and pelvic canals of larger size and, among females, relatively broader medio-lateral dimensions relative to low-latitude samples, which tend to display relatively expanded inlet antero-posterior (A-P) and posterior canal dimensions. Differences in canal shape exist among samples that are not associated with latitude or body size, suggesting independence of some canal shape characteristics from body size and shape. The South Africans are distinctive with very narrow bodies and small pelvic inlets relative to an elongated lower canal in A-P and posterior lengths. Variation in pelvic canal geometry among populations is consistent with a high degree of evolvability in the human pelvis.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23504988     DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.22243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol        ISSN: 0002-9483            Impact factor:   2.868


  8 in total

1.  Covariation between human pelvis shape, stature, and head size alleviates the obstetric dilemma.

Authors:  Barbara Fischer; Philipp Mitteroecker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The evolution of the human pelvis: changing adaptations to bipedalism, obstetrics and thermoregulation.

Authors:  Laura Tobias Gruss; Daniel Schmitt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  A review of musculoskeletal modelling of human locomotion.

Authors:  Adam D Sylvester; Steven G Lautzenheiser; Patricia Ann Kramer
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 4.661

4.  Human variation in the shape of the birth canal is significant and geographically structured.

Authors:  Lia Betti; Andrea Manica
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The anthropometric definition of the rectum is highly variable.

Authors:  Molly A Wasserman; Michael F McGee; Irene B Helenowski; Amy L Halverson; Anne-Marie Boller; Steven J Stryker
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  Shaping birth: variation in the birth canal and the importance of inclusive obstetric care.

Authors:  Lia Betti
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 6.671

7.  Embodied niche construction in the hominin lineage: semiotic structure and sustained attention in human embodied cognition.

Authors:  Aaron J Stutz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-08-01

8.  Evaluation of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry compared to magnetic resonance imaging for collecting measurements of the human bony pelvis.

Authors:  Sarah-Louise Decrausaz; Meghan K Shirley; Jay T Stock; Jane E Williams; Mary S Fewtrell; Chris A Clark; Owen J Arthurs; Jonathan C K Wells
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 2.947

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.