| Literature DB >> 23504942 |
Morten S Dueholm1, Mads T Søndergaard, Martin Nilsson, Gunna Christiansen, Allan Stensballe, Michael T Overgaard, Michael Givskov, Tim Tolker-Nielsen, Daniel E Otzen, Per H Nielsen.
Abstract
The fap operon, encoding functional amyloids in Pseudomonas (Fap), is present in most pseudomonads, but so far the expression and importance for biofilm formation has only been investigated for P. fluorescens strain UK4. In this study, we demonstrate the capacity of P. aeruginosa PAO1, P. fluorescens Pf-5, and P. putida F1 to express Fap fibrils, and investigated the effect of Fap expression on aggregation and biofilm formation. The fap operon in all three Pseudomonas species conferred the ability to express Fap fibrils as shown using a recombinant approach. This Fap overexpression consistently resulted in highly aggregative phenotypes and in increased biofilm formation. Detailed biophysical investigations of purified fibrils confirmed FapC as the main fibril monomer and supported the role of FapB as a minor, nucleating constituent as also indicated by bioinformatic analysis. Bioinformatics analysis suggested FapF and FapD as a potential β-barrel membrane pore and protease, respectively. Manipulation of the fap operon showed that FapA affects monomer composition of the final amyloid fibril, and that FapB is an amyloid protein, probably a nucleator for FapC polymerization. Our study highlights the fap operon as a molecular machine for functional amyloid formation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23504942 PMCID: PMC3684753 DOI: 10.1002/mbo3.81
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiologyopen ISSN: 2045-8827 Impact factor: 3.139
Bacteria, plasmids, and primers used in this study. The underlined primer sequences included restriction enzyme cleavage sites
| Species and strain | Characteristics/Sequence | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Mach1 | Used for routine subcloning | Invitrogen |
| INV110 | Nonmethylating plasmid host | Invitrogen |
| S17-1 | Simon et al. ( | |
| DH5α | F−, φ80d | Invitrogen |
| HB101/pRK600 | Smr, | Klausen et al. ( |
| HB101/pUX-BF13 | Smr, | Klausen et al. ( |
| HB101/pBK-mini-Tn7(Smr)-gfp | Smr, | Klausen et al. ( |
| | Wild type | Dueholm et al. ( |
| | UK4 with pMMB190Tc-UK4fap | This study |
| | Wild type | Jacobs et al. ( |
| | PAO1 with pMMB190Tc-PAO1fap | This study |
| | PAO1 tagged with eGfp in a mini-Tn7 construct; Smr | This study |
| | This study | |
| | This study | |
| | PAO1 with pMM190Tc; tagged with eGfp in a mini-Tn7 construct; Smr | This study |
| | PAO1 with pMM190TcPAO1fap; tagged with eGfp in a mini-Tn7 construct; Smr | This study |
| | PW4417, transposon mutant of PAO1 with | Jacobs et al. ( |
| | Wild type | ATCC 700007 |
| | F1 with pMMB190Tc-F1fap | This study |
| | F1 with pMMB190Tc-F1fapΔA | This study |
| | Wild type | ATCC BAA-477 |
| | Pf-5 with pMMB190Tc-Pf5-fap | This study |
| Plasmids | ||
| pMMB190 | IncQ | Morales et al. ( |
| pEX18Tc | Source of | Hoang et al. ( |
| pMMB190Tc | pMMB190 Δ | This study |
| pMMB190Tc-UK4fap | pMMB190Tc with UK4 | This study |
| pMMB190Tc-PAO1fap | pMMB190Tc with PAO1 | This study |
| pMMB190Tc-F1fap | pMMB190Tc with F1 | This study |
| pMMB190Tc-F1fapΔA | pMMB190Tc with F1 | This study |
| pMMB190Tc-Pf-5fap | pMMB190Tc with Pf-5 | This study |
| pUX-BF13 | Bao et al. ( | |
| pBK-mini-Tn7(Smr)-gfp | Delivery plasmid for mini-Tn7-PA1/04/03-gfp; Ampr, Smr | Koch et al. ( |
| pRK600 | Kessler et al. ( | |
| pDONR221 | Gateway donor vector; Kmr | Invitrogen |
| pEX18ApGW | Gateway compatible gene replacement vector; Sucs, Ampr | Choi and Schweizer ( |
| pPS856 | 0.83 kb blunt-ended SacI fragment from pUCGM ligated into the EcoRV site of pPS854; Ampr, Gmr | Hoang et al. ( |
| pDONR221 | This study | |
| pEX18Ap | This study | |
| Primers | ||
| TetR-Fw | 5'-CCTCGTGATACGCCTATTT | This study |
| TetR-Rw | 5'-GCGGTGGTTTTTTTGTTTG | This study |
| EcoRI-UK4fapFw | 5'- | This study |
| HindIII-UK4fapRw | 5'- | This study |
| EcoRI-PAO1fapFw | 5'- | This study |
| HindIII-PAO1fapRw | 5'- | This study |
| EcoRI-F1fapFw | 5'- | This study |
| BamHI-F1fapRw | 5'- | This study |
| EcoRI-Pf-5fapFw | 5'- | This study |
| BamHI-Pf-5fapRw | 5'- | This study |
Figure 1The Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 fap operon is transcribed and transcription is affected by growth phase, temperature, and NaCl concentration. Promoter activity during growth was measured using the reporter strain PAO1 fapA::lacZ, which produced β-galactosidase under control of the fap promoter. β-galactosidase activity within samples was normalized according to OD600 nm. (A) Specific activity of the fap promoter during growth at 37°C in LB-medium containing 200 mM NaCl. Similar profiles were seen with other NaCl concentrations. β-galactosidase activity are marked by squares and OD600 nm by circles. (B) Specific activity of the fap promoter in cultures grown in LB-medium at various temperatures. (C) Specific activity of the fap promoter in cultures grown in LB-medium containing various concentrations of NaCl. For B and C, the data show samples collected at OD600 nm = 1.0–1.5.
Figure 2PAO1 wild type and derivatives cell aggregation and quantification of biofilm. (A) Confocal laser scanning micrographs of samples from GFP-tagged PAO1 shake flask cultures with images chosen to represent the average composition of samples. Bars, 50 μm. (B) Amount of biofilm formed in microtiter plates. The biofilm biomass was quantified by the use of a crystal violet staining assay. The mean and standard deviation of six replicates are shown.
Figure 3PAO1 biofilm formation in flow chambers. Confocal laser scanning micrographs of GFP-tagged PAO1 wild type and derivative cultures and biofilms formed in flow chambers. Images were captured after 1, 2, 3, and 4 days of cultivation. Each image contains top view (upper left) and two side view panes (bottom and right linings) with focus depth indicated (white markers). Bars, 50 μm.
Figure 4In situ imaging of Fap fibrils in recombinant cultures. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of PAO1 pFap, Pf-5 pFap, UK4 pFap, and F1 pFap shake flask cultures at different magnifications. No fibrils were found in the corresponding wild type cultures (no images). Bars 0.5 μm.
Figure 5Analysis of purified fibrils. (A) TEM images showing fibrils identical to those in culture. (B) FTIR spectra (top) and with the calculated 2nd derivative spectra (bottom) for peak and shape identification. (C) SDS-PAGE gel of preparations resuspended in water (÷) or FA (+) prior to lyophilization and reconstitution in loading buffer. Calculated Mw of FapC is 33.0, 34.0 and 25.1 kDa for Pf-5, PAO1, and Pf-5, respectively.
Figure 6Analysis of the F1 pFap(ΔfapA) culture and purified fibrils. (A) Photograph of culture flask (turned on the side) showing a biofilm rim at the air-medium interface. (B) TEM images showing fibrils identical to those in culture. (C) FTIR spectra (top) and with the calculated 2nd derivative spectra (bottom) for peak and shape identification. (D) SDS-PAGE gel of preparations resuspended in water (÷) or FA (+) prior to lyophilization and reconstitution in loading buffer. The calculated Mw of the Pseudomonas putida F1 FapB and FapC are 19.9 kDa and 49.2 kDa, respectively. The faint band at ∼40 kDa was identified as FapB, likely migrating as a dimer.
Figure 7Pseudomonas FapC phylogeny and Fap evolutionary divergence. (A) FapC-based phylogenetic tree of 18 Pseudomonas harboring the fap operon. Scale bar indicates amino acid substitutions per position. (B) Measure of evolutionary divergence of the individual Fap proteins. Each bar indicates cumulated evolutionary distances for a given Fap protein across the 18 strains. This measure is equivalent to the summed branch lengths from a phylogenetic tree as presented in A. (C) Measure of evolutionary divergence of the individual curli Csg proteins across the 88 bacteria. Selected bars are colored according to predicted protein function: main amyloid monomer (blue), nucleator (yellow), and membrane pore (red) – see discussion.
Figure 8fap operon and FapB-C schematic overview. (A) Overview of the fap operon and below the FapB and FapC region structure. Widths of elements reflect their amino acid lengths. S: signal peptide, N: N-terminal region, R: repeat region, L: linker region, C: C-terminal region. (B) Repeat region consensus sequences from alignment of the 18 FapC and FapB protein sequences, respectively. Consensus cutoff was set at 90% identity across sequences. Overlined residue indicates 100% conservation. Residue in bold indicates >90% conservation of chemical properties: apolar (black), polar (green), and charged (blue). No formatting for residues with property conservation <90%.
Figure 9Conceptual models of the Fap molecular mechanism and the FapB/FapC amyloid fibril. (Left) Proposed functions of the Fap proteins. All Fap proteins are secreted via Sec across the inner cell membrane (IM). FapB, FapC, and FapE are further secreted across the outer cell membrane (OM) via FapF, where FapB nucleates fibrillation of FapC and FapE associates with the final fibril. Fibrils free in culture suspension were observed as well as adjacent to cells. FapD and FapA may reside in the periplasm, where FapA in an unknown manner affects FapB and FapC incorporation into the final fibril, for example, via their secretion, while FapD is likely a protease involved in proteolysis of Fap proteins. (Right) Suggested alignment of FapB and FapC protein regions in the mature FuBA. The linker regions may form additional β-strands inside the amyloid core, thus the position of the linker regions may deviate from the presented model.