Literature DB >> 23504795

Environmental and physical controls on northern terrestrial methane emissions across permafrost zones.

David Olefeldt1, Merritt R Turetsky, Patrick M Crill, A David McGuire.   

Abstract

Methane (CH4 ) emissions from the northern high-latitude region represent potentially significant biogeochemical feedbacks to the climate system. We compiled a database of growing-season CH4 emissions from terrestrial ecosystems located across permafrost zones, including 303 sites described in 65 studies. Data on environmental and physical variables, including permafrost conditions, were used to assess controls on CH4 emissions. Water table position, soil temperature, and vegetation composition strongly influenced emissions and had interacting effects. Sites with a dense sedge cover had higher emissions than other sites at comparable water table positions, and this was an effect that was more pronounced at low soil temperatures. Sensitivity analysis suggested that CH4 emissions from ecosystems where the water table on average is at or above the soil surface (wet tundra, fen underlain by permafrost, and littoral ecosystems) are more sensitive to variability in soil temperature than drier ecosystems (palsa dry tundra, bog, and fen), whereas the latter ecosystems conversely are relatively more sensitive to changes of the water table position. Sites with near-surface permafrost had lower CH4 fluxes than sites without permafrost at comparable water table positions, a difference that was explained by lower soil temperatures. Neither the active layer depth nor the organic soil layer depth was related to CH4 emissions. Permafrost thaw in lowland regions is often associated with increased soil moisture, higher soil temperatures, and increased sedge cover. In our database, lowland thermokarst sites generally had higher emissions than adjacent sites with intact permafrost, but emissions from thermokarst sites were not statistically higher than emissions from permafrost-free sites with comparable environmental conditions. Overall, these results suggest that future changes to terrestrial high-latitude CH4 emissions will be more proximately related to changes in moisture, soil temperature, and vegetation composition than to increased availability of organic matter following permafrost thaw.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23504795     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  25 in total

Review 1.  Climate change and the permafrost carbon feedback.

Authors:  E A G Schuur; A D McGuire; C Schädel; G Grosse; J W Harden; D J Hayes; G Hugelius; C D Koven; P Kuhry; D M Lawrence; S M Natali; D Olefeldt; V E Romanovsky; K Schaefer; M R Turetsky; C C Treat; J E Vonk
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Methane dynamics regulated by microbial community response to permafrost thaw.

Authors:  Carmody K McCalley; Ben J Woodcroft; Suzanne B Hodgkins; Richard A Wehr; Eun-Hae Kim; Rhiannon Mondav; Patrick M Crill; Jeffrey P Chanton; Virginia I Rich; Gene W Tyson; Scott R Saleska
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Methane emissions from Alaska in 2012 from CARVE airborne observations.

Authors:  Rachel Y-W Chang; Charles E Miller; Steven J Dinardo; Anna Karion; Colm Sweeney; Bruce C Daube; John M Henderson; Marikate E Mountain; Janusz Eluszkiewicz; John B Miller; Lori M P Bruhwiler; Steven C Wofsy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Methane transport from the active layer to lakes in the Arctic using Toolik Lake, Alaska, as a case study.

Authors:  Adina Paytan; Alanna L Lecher; Natasha Dimova; Katy J Sparrow; Fenix Garcia-Tigreros Kodovska; Joseph Murray; Slawomir Tulaczyk; John D Kessler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Variations in Temperature Sensitivity (Q10) of CH4 Emission from a Subtropical Estuarine Marsh in Southeast China.

Authors:  Chun Wang; Derrick Y F Lai; Chuan Tong; Weiqi Wang; Jiafang Huang; Chongsheng Zeng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Environmental and vegetation controls on the spatial variability of CH4 emission from wet-sedge and tussock tundra ecosystems in the Arctic.

Authors:  Katherine Rose McEwing; James Paul Fisher; Donatella Zona
Journal:  Plant Soil       Date:  2015-01-11       Impact factor: 4.192

7.  A simplified, data-constrained approach to estimate the permafrost carbon-climate feedback.

Authors:  C D Koven; E A G Schuur; C Schädel; T J Bohn; E J Burke; G Chen; X Chen; P Ciais; G Grosse; J W Harden; D J Hayes; G Hugelius; E E Jafarov; G Krinner; P Kuhry; D M Lawrence; A H MacDougall; S S Marchenko; A D McGuire; S M Natali; D J Nicolsky; D Olefeldt; S Peng; V E Romanovsky; K M Schaefer; J Strauss; C C Treat; M Turetsky
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Quantifying landscape-level methane fluxes in subarctic Finland using a multiscale approach.

Authors:  Iain P Hartley; Timothy C Hill; Thomas J Wade; Robert J Clement; John B Moncrieff; Ana Prieto-Blanco; Mathias I Disney; Brian Huntley; Mathew Williams; Nicholas J K Howden; Philip A Wookey; Robert Baxter
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 10.863

9.  Metabolic and trophic interactions modulate methane production by Arctic peat microbiota in response to warming.

Authors:  Alexander Tøsdal Tveit; Tim Urich; Peter Frenzel; Mette Marianne Svenning
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Rising methane emissions from northern wetlands associated with sea ice decline.

Authors:  Frans-Jan W Parmentier; Wenxin Zhang; Yanjiao Mi; Xudong Zhu; Jacobus van Huissteden; Daniel J Hayes; Qianlai Zhuang; Torben R Christensen; A David McGuire
Journal:  Geophys Res Lett       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 4.720

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.