Literature DB >> 23504775

Does more mean less? The value of information for conservation planning under sea level rise.

Rebecca K Runting1, Kerrie A Wilson, Jonathan R Rhodes.   

Abstract

Many studies have explored the benefits of adopting more sophisticated modelling techniques or spatial data in terms of our ability to accurately predict ecosystem responses to global change. However, we currently know little about whether the improved predictions will actually lead to better conservation outcomes once the costs of gaining improved models or data are accounted for. This severely limits our ability to make strategic decisions for adaptation to global pressures, particularly in landscapes subject to dynamic change such as the coastal zone. In such landscapes, the global phenomenon of sea level rise is a critical consideration for preserving biodiversity. Here, we address this issue in the context of making decisions about where to locate a reserve system to preserve coastal biodiversity with a limited budget. Specifically, we determined the cost-effectiveness of investing in high-resolution elevation data and process-based models for predicting wetland shifts in a coastal region of South East Queensland, Australia. We evaluated the resulting priority areas for reserve selection to quantify the cost-effectiveness of investment in better quantifying biological and physical processes. We show that, in this case, it is considerably more cost effective to use a process-based model and high-resolution elevation data, even if this requires a substantial proportion of the project budget to be expended (up to 99% in one instance). The less accurate model and data set failed to identify areas of high conservation value, reducing the cost-effectiveness of the resultant conservation plan. This suggests that when developing conservation plans in areas where sea level rise threatens biodiversity, investing in high-resolution elevation data and process-based models to predict shifts in coastal ecosystems may be highly cost effective. A future research priority is to determine how this cost-effectiveness varies among different regions across the globe.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23504775     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  5 in total

1.  How to preserve coastal wetlands, threatened by climate change-driven rises in sea level.

Authors:  Danijel Ivajnšič; Mitja Kaligarič
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-02-02       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Integrating climate adaptation and biodiversity conservation in the global ocean.

Authors:  Derek P Tittensor; Maria Beger; Kristina Boerder; Daniel G Boyce; Rachel D Cavanagh; Aurelie Cosandey-Godin; Guillermo Ortuño Crespo; Daniel C Dunn; Wildan Ghiffary; Susie M Grant; Lee Hannah; Patrick N Halpin; Mike Harfoot; Susan G Heaslip; Nicholas W Jeffery; Naomi Kingston; Heike K Lotze; Jennifer McGowan; Elizabeth McLeod; Chris J McOwen; Bethan C O'Leary; Laurenne Schiller; Ryan R E Stanley; Maxine Westhead; Kristen L Wilson; Boris Worm
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 14.136

Review 3.  The trajectory of dispersal research in conservation biology. Systematic review.

Authors:  Don A Driscoll; Sam C Banks; Philip S Barton; Karen Ikin; Pia Lentini; David B Lindenmayer; Annabel L Smith; Laurence E Berry; Emma L Burns; Amanda Edworthy; Maldwyn J Evans; Rebecca Gibson; Rob Heinsohn; Brett Howland; Geoff Kay; Nicola Munro; Ben C Scheele; Ingrid Stirnemann; Dejan Stojanovic; Nici Sweaney; Nélida R Villaseñor; Martin J Westgate
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Impacts of climate-change-driven sea level rise on intertidal rocky reef habitats will be variable and site specific.

Authors:  Jaqueline Thorner; Lalit Kumar; Stephen D A Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The conservation value of elevation data accuracy and model sophistication in reserve design under sea-level rise.

Authors:  Mingjian Zhu; Tom Hoctor; Mike Volk; Kathryn Frank; Anna Linhoss
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 2.912

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.