Literature DB >> 23504717

Livestock greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation potential in Europe.

Jessica Bellarby1, Reyes Tirado, Adrian Leip, Franz Weiss, Jan Peter Lesschen, Pete Smith.   

Abstract

The livestock sector contributes considerably to global greenhouse gas emissions (GHG). Here, for the year 2007 we examined GHG emissions in the EU27 livestock sector and estimated GHG emissions from production and consumption of livestock products; including imports, exports and wastage. We also reviewed available mitigation options and estimated their potential. The focus of this review is on the beef and dairy sector since these contribute 60% of all livestock production emissions. Particular attention is paid to the role of land use and land use change (LULUC) and carbon sequestration in grasslands. GHG emissions of all livestock products amount to between 630 and 863 Mt CO2 e, or 12-17% of total EU27 GHG emissions in 2007. The highest emissions aside from production, originate from LULUC, followed by emissions from wasted food. The total GHG mitigation potential from the livestock sector in Europe is between 101 and 377 Mt CO2 e equivalent to between 12 and 61% of total EU27 livestock sector emissions in 2007. A reduction in food waste and consumption of livestock products linked with reduced production, are the most effective mitigation options, and if encouraged, would also deliver environmental and human health benefits. Production of beef and dairy on grassland, as opposed to intensive grain fed production, can be associated with a reduction in GHG emissions depending on actual LULUC emissions. This could be promoted on rough grazing land where appropriate.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23504717     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02786.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  18 in total

Review 1.  Nitrogen footprints: Regional realities and options to reduce nitrogen loss to the environment.

Authors:  Hideaki Shibata; James N Galloway; Allison M Leach; Lia R Cattaneo; Laura Cattell Noll; Jan Willem Erisman; Baojing Gu; Xia Liang; Kentaro Hayashi; Lin Ma; Tommy Dalgaard; Morten Graversgaard; Deli Chen; Keisuke Nansai; Junko Shindo; Kazuyo Matsubae; Azusa Oita; Ming-Chien Su; Shin-Ichiro Mishima; Albert Bleeker
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 5.129

2.  Portuguese agriculture and the evolution of greenhouse gas emissions-can vegetables control livestock emissions?

Authors:  Paulo Reis Mourao; Vítor Domingues Martinho
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  Agriculture, dairy and fishery farming practices and greenhouse gas emission footprint: a strategic appraisal for mitigation.

Authors:  Avijit Ghosh; Sukanya Misra; Ranjan Bhattacharyya; Abhijit Sarkar; Amit Kumar Singh; Vikas Chandra Tyagi; Ram Vinod Kumar; Vijay Singh Meena
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Environmental effectiveness of swine sewage management: a multicriteria AHP-based model for a reliable quick assessment.

Authors:  Marco Vizzari; Giuseppe Modica
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Trends and Projected Estimates of GHG Emissions from Indian Livestock in Comparisons with GHG Emissions from World and Developing Countries.

Authors:  Amlan Kumar Patra
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.509

6.  Milk Quality and Carbon Footprint Indicators of Dairy Sheep Farms Depend on Grazing Level and Identify the Different Management Systems.

Authors:  Javier Plaza; Isabel Revilla; Jaime Nieto; Cristina Hidalgo; Mario Sánchez-García; Carlos Palacios
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 7.  Carbon myopia: The urgent need for integrated social, economic and environmental action in the livestock sector.

Authors:  Matthew Tom Harrison; Brendan Richard Cullen; Dianne Elizabeth Mayberry; Annette Louise Cowie; Franco Bilotto; Warwick Brabazon Badgery; Ke Liu; Thomas Davison; Karen Michelle Christie; Albert Muleke; Richard John Eckard
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2021-08-29       Impact factor: 13.211

8.  Quantifying beetle-mediated effects on gas fluxes from dung pats.

Authors:  Atte Penttilä; Eleanor M Slade; Asko Simojoki; Terhi Riutta; Kari Minkkinen; Tomas Roslin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Impacts of feeding less food-competing feedstuffs to livestock on global food system sustainability.

Authors:  Christian Schader; Adrian Muller; Nadia El-Hage Scialabba; Judith Hecht; Anne Isensee; Karl-Heinz Erb; Pete Smith; Harinder P S Makkar; Peter Klocke; Florian Leiber; Patrizia Schwegler; Matthias Stolze; Urs Niggli
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-12-06       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Effects of Adaptation of In vitro Rumen Culture to Garlic Oil, Nitrate, and Saponin and Their Combinations on Methanogenesis, Fermentation, and Abundances and Diversity of Microbial Populations.

Authors:  Amlan K Patra; Zhongtang Yu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.