Literature DB >> 23504713

The importance of context information for the spatial specificity of gaze cueing.

Eva Wiese1, Jan Zwickel, Hermann Josef Müller.   

Abstract

In three experiments, we investigated the spatial allocation of attention in response to central gaze cues. In particular, we examined whether the allocation of attentional resources is influenced by context information-that is, the presence or absence of reference objects (i.e., placeholders) in the periphery. On each trial, gaze cues were followed by a target stimulus to which participants had to respond by keypress or by performing a target-directed saccade. Targets were presented either in an empty visual field (Exps. 1 and 2) or in previewed location placeholders (Exp. 3) and appeared at one of either 18 (Exp. 1) or six (Exps. 2 and 3) possible positions. The spatial distribution of attention was determined by comparing response times as a function of the distance between the cued and target positions. Gaze cueing was not specific to the exact cued position, but instead generalized equally to all positions in the cued hemifield, when no context information was provided. However, gaze direction induced a facilitation effect specific to the exact gazed-at position when reference objects were presented. We concluded that the presence of possible objects in the periphery to which gaze cues could refer is a prerequisite for attention shifts being specific to the gazed-at position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23504713     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-013-0444-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  7 in total

1.  Monkeys head-gaze following is fast, precise and not fully suppressible.

Authors:  Karolina Marciniak; Peter W Dicke; Peter Thier
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The affordance-matching hypothesis: how objects guide action understanding and prediction.

Authors:  Patric Bach; Toby Nicholson; Matthew Hudson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  On the role of eye contact in gaze cueing.

Authors:  Kyveli Kompatsiari; Francesca Ciardo; Vadim Tikhanoff; Giorgio Metta; Agnieszka Wykowska
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Space-based and object-centered gaze cuing of attention in right hemisphere-damaged patients.

Authors:  Mario Dalmaso; Luigi Castelli; Konstantinos Priftis; Marta Buccheri; Daniela Primon; Silvia Tronco; Giovanni Galfano
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-04

5.  What we observe is biased by what other people tell us: beliefs about the reliability of gaze behavior modulate attentional orienting to gaze cues.

Authors:  Eva Wiese; Agnieszka Wykowska; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Prior expectations about where other people are likely to direct their attention systematically influence gaze perception.

Authors:  Peter C Pantelis; Daniel P Kennedy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Can Monetary Reward Modulate Social Attention?

Authors:  Emanuele Lo Gerfo; Jacopo De Angelis; Alessandra Vergallito; Francesco Bossi; Leonor Josefina Romero Lauro; Paola Ricciardelli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-11-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.