Literature DB >> 23504120

Function-preserving gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.

Naoki Hiki1, Souya Nunobe, Takeshi Kubota, Xiaohua Jiang.   

Abstract

The number of early gastric cancer (EGC) cases has been increasing because of improved diagnostic procedures. Applications of function-preserving gastric cancer surgery may therefore also be increasing because of its low incidence of lymph node metastasis, excellent survival rates, and the possibility of less-invasive procedures such as laparoscopic gastrectomy being used in combination. Pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG) with radical lymph node dissection is one such function-preserving procedure that has been applied for EGC, with the indications, limitations, and survival benefits of PPG already reported in several retrospective studies. Laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy has also been applied for EGC of the upper third of the stomach, although this procedure can be associated with the 2 major problems of reflux esophagitis and carcinoma arising in the gastric stump. In the patient with EGC in the upper third of the stomach, laparoscopy-assisted subtotal gastrectomy with a preserved very small stomach may provide a better quality of life for the patients and fewer postoperative complications. Finally, the laparoscopy endoscopy cooperative surgery procedure combines endoscopic submucosal dissection with laparoscopic gastric wall resection, which prevents excessive resection and deformation of the stomach after surgery and was recently applied for EGC cases without possibility of lymph node metastasis. Function-preserving laparoscopic gastrectomy is recommended for the treatment of EGC if the indication followed by accurate diagnosis is strictly confirmed. Preservation of remnant stomach sometimes causes severe postoperative dysfunctions such as delayed gastric retention in PPG, esophageal reflux in PG, and gastric stump carcinoma in the remnant stomach. Moreover, these techniques present technical difficulties to the surgeon. Although many retrospective studies showed the functional benefit or oncological safety of function-preserving gastrectomy, further prospective studies using large case series are necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23504120     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-013-2931-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  43 in total

Review 1.  Reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach: a review of the literature published from 2000 to 2014.

Authors:  Masaki Nakamura; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Assessment of postoperative quality of life following pylorus-preserving gastrectomy and Billroth-I distal gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients: results of the nationwide postgastrectomy syndrome assessment study.

Authors:  Junya Fujita; Masazumi Takahashi; Takashi Urushihara; Kazuaki Tanabe; Yasuhiro Kodera; Takeyoshi Yumiba; Hideo Matsumoto; Akinori Takagane; Chikara Kunisaki; Koji Nakada
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 7.370

3.  Subtotal gastrectomy with limited lymph node dissection is a feasible treatment option for patients with early gastric stump cancer.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Irino; Naoki Hiki; Souya Nunobe; Manabu Ohashi; Shinya Tanimura; Takeshi Sano; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Current role of minimally invasive approaches in the treatment of early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Abraham El-Sedfy; Savtaj S Brar; Natalie G Coburn
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Function-preserving surgery for gastric cancer: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Souya Nunobe; Naoki Hiki
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-09-25

6.  Preservation of the celiac branch of the vagal nerve for pylorus-preserving gastrectomy: is it meaningful?

Authors:  Haruna Furukawa; Manabu Ohashi; Michitaka Honda; Koshi Kumagai; Souya Nunobe; Takeshi Sano; Naoki Hiki
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 7.370

7.  Size-dependent differences in the proximal remnant stomach: how much does a small remnant stomach after subtotal gastrectomy work?

Authors:  Itaru Yasufuku; Manabu Ohashi; Kojiro Eto; Satoshi Ida; Koshi Kumagai; Souya Nunobe; Takeshi Sano; Naoki Hiki
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Long-term quality-of-life comparison of total gastrectomy and proximal gastrectomy by postgastrectomy syndrome assessment scale (PGSAS-45): a nationwide multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Takiguchi; Masazumi Takahashi; Masami Ikeda; Satoshi Inagawa; Shugo Ueda; Takayuki Nobuoka; Manabu Ota; Yoshiaki Iwasaki; Nobuyuki Uchida; Yasuhiro Kodera; Koji Nakada
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 7.370

9.  Comparison Between Billroth-II with Braun and Roux-en-Y Reconstruction After Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Chang In Choi; Dong Hoon Baek; Si Hak Lee; Sun Hwi Hwang; Dae Hwan Kim; Kwang Ha Kim; Tae Yong Jeon; Dong Heon Kim
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Oncological outcomes of function-preserving gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: a multicenter propensity score matched cohort analysis comparing pylorus-preserving gastrectomy versus conventional distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Masaki Aizawa; Michitaka Honda; Naoki Hiki; Takahiro Kinoshita; Hiroshi Yabusaki; Souya Nunobe; Hidehito Shibasaki; Atsushi Matsuki; Masahiro Watanabe; Takayuki Abe
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 7.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.