| Literature DB >> 23503945 |
Yong-In Ju1, Teruki Sone, Kazuhiro Ohnaru, Hak-Jin Choi, Kyung-A Choi, Masao Fukunaga.
Abstract
Three-dimensional femoral trabecular architecture was investigated in tail-<span class="Chemical">suspended young growing rats and the effects of jump exercise during the period of tail-suspension were also examined. Eight-week-old male Wistar rats (n = 24) were randomly assigned to three body weight-matched groups: a tail suspended group (SUS, n = 8); a sedentary control group (CON, n = 8) and rats primed with jump exercise during the period of tail suspension (JUM, n = 8). The jump exercise protocol consisted of 30 jumps/day, five days/week with a 40 cm jump height. After 3 weeks of jump exercise, bone mineral density (BMD) of the entire right femur was measured using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Three-dimensional trabecular bone architecture at the distal femoral metaphysis was evaluated using microcomputed tomography (micro-CT). Tail suspension caused a decrease in femoral BMD (-5%, p < 0.001) and trabecular bone architectural deterioration. Deterioration in the trabecular network during hindlimb unloading was mostly attributed to the reduction of trabecular number (-32%, p < 0.001) in the distal femoral metaphysis. Jump exercise during the tail suspension period increased trabecular thickness (14%, p < 0.001) and the reduction of trabecular number was suppressed. The present data indicate that jump exercise applied during hindlimb unloading could be able to inhibit bone loss and trabecular bone architectural deterioration caused by tail suspension.Entities:
Keywords: Jump exercise; Microarchitecture; Microcomputed tomography; Tail suspension; Trabecular bone
Year: 2013 PMID: 23503945 PMCID: PMC3597269 DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-35
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Figure 1Volumes of interest in the femur (sagittal section of distal femoral metaphysis).
Body weight, hindlimb muscle weight, and femoral length in experimental rats
| CON | SUS | JUM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 8) | (n = 8) | (n = 8) | |
| Initial body weight (g) | 238.95 ± 7.55 | 242.11 ± 6.85 | 238.15 ± 19.44 |
| Final body weight (g) | 312.04 ± 15.50 | 274.61 ± 18.45** | 279.43 ± 19.44** |
| Hindlimb muscles weight | |||
| Soleus muscle (g) | 0.12 ± 0.01 | 0.06 ± 0.01*** | 0.07 ± 0.01*** |
| Gastrocnemius muscle (g) | 1.40 ± 0.10 | 1.14 ± 0.08*** | 1.22 ± 0.11*** |
| Total muscle mass (g) | 1.52 ± 0.11 | 1.21 ± 0.09*** | 1.29 ± 0.11*** |
| Femoral length (mm) | 36.37 ± 0.87 | 36.32 ± 0.32 | 36.17 ± 0.53 |
All values represent mean ± SD. n, number of rats in each group; SUS, tail-suspended group; CON, sedentary cage control group for SUS; JUM, jump exercised group during tail suspension. Significant difference vs. CON group: **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Figure 2Total femoral BMD measured by DXA. All values represent mean ± SD. SUS, tail-suspended group; CON, sedentary control group for SUS; JUM, jump exercised group during tail suspension. Significant difference vs. SUS group: ***p < 0.001. Significant difference vs. CON group: †††p < 0.001.
Figure 3Microstructural parameters in the distal femoral metaphysis measured by micro-CT. All values represent mean ± SD. SUS, tail-suspended group; CON, sedentary control group for SUS; JUM, jump exercised group during tail suspension; BV/TV, trabecular bone volume (A); Tb.Th, trabecular thickness (B); Tb.N, trabecular number (C); Tb.Sp, trabecular separation (D). Significant difference vs. SUS group: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. Significant difference vs. CON group: †††p < 0.001.
Figure 4Typical three-dimensional micro-computed tomography images of the distal femoral metaphysis: (A) CON; (B) SUS; and (C) JUM. Intact bone and isolated cancellous bone for calculating trabecular bone parameters are shown at the top and bottom, respectively. SUS, tail-suspended group; CON, sedentary control group for SUS; JUM, jump exercised group during tail suspension.